Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, there's not an inconsistency.exactly because you don't know he cleaned it. You just know that theirs an inconsistency and thus you assert he cleaned it up in order to believe as you do that the flood happened.
Why not look at the documentation found in God's own creation directly?!? Or are you saying that God would deceive us through His own Creation?And documenting that He cleaned it up would change that --- would it?
Sheesh....the importance of the subject is far greater than spilt milk.If that was an inconsistency, then everyone who spills milk, cleans it up, then tells someone they spilled milk w/o telling them they cleaned it up is also being inconsistent.
I'm not qualified to do that --- and the ones that are report that it didn't happen; which tells me they either need to keep looking, or abandon the search and go on the Documentation alone.Why not look at the documentation found in God's own creation directly?!? Or are you saying that God would deceive us through His own Creation?
No, there's not an inconsistency.
If that was an inconsistency, then everyone who spills milk, cleans it up, then tells someone they spilled milk w/o telling them they cleaned it up is also being inconsistent.
I see. You prefer documentation that's totally faulty because it's coming from the myths of a very ancient middle-eastern tribe of nomadic desert dwellers. And you prefer those ancient myths over what Creation itself is telling us.I'm not qualified to do that --- and the ones that are report that it didn't happen; which tells me they either need to keep looking, or abandon the search and go on the Documentation alone.
I'm not qualified to do that --- and the ones that are report that it didn't happen; which tells me they either need to keep looking, or abandon the search and go on the Documentation alone.
Then, if you think that's such a big deal --- by all means --- keep looking.But the 'documentation" does not say God cleaned anything up after the Flood.
The Bible isn't "documentation." It's literature.
Is It now?The Bible isn't "documentation." It's literature.
You mean like when I answer a question with "basic doctrine"?Exactly.
It's funny given how often AV claims that "it's in the documentation" and yet has to resort to his own extrabiblical ideas all the time.
You mean like when I answer a question with "basic doctrine"?
You confuse me here. Doctrine is just a bunch of beliefs taught by the Church. It's man's attempt to understand God. You will accept those beliefs over what God Himself has documented with in His Own Creation. I don't understand why what God is showing us in His own Creation does not take precedence over all else.You mean like when I answer a question with "basic doctrine"?
No --- but then I neither claim it is in the Bible, nor call it "basic doctrine".You mean like when I answer a question with "basic doctrine"?is Neptune being the location for the flood water and also being a warning to rogue angels considered basic doctrine?
It's funny given how often AV claims that "it's in the documentation"...
It's much more than that.Doctrine is just a bunch of beliefs taught by the Church.
ie…Beliefs. Which you give more credence to than what God is showing us in His own Creation. And I'm not understanding that.Doctrine is beliefs in codified form.
Is It now?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?