Thanks for the entertaining video. It reminded of a fellow I knew of who attended a local RCC college in my home town. He was a sincere and devout member of the Church, as was his family. As a result, he decided to take a course in the Pauline epistles. As the course went along he realized that the priest who was giving the class was in significant contradiction to the text. After class one day he met with the priest to discuss these matters. The priest then asked him if he thought he could interpret the Bible on his own, to which he, innocently, said he could. Then the priest told him that, if so, he could not be a Catholic. After pondering that for a bit, he responded that well, if that were the case, he was not a Catholic. Subsequently, he left the RCC and joined a Protestant church.
The problem is not the Bible itself, but the arrogation of its interpretation to any church or body of theologians composed of fallible, human beings. By the way, in case you do not know, papal infallibility was not proclaimed a dogma until 1872. When extrablical material is elevated to the same level as that of inspired scripture, as is the case with certain sects, there is a significant problem. When the material comes into contradiction with the Bible itself, there is significant heresy.