Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Thank you for sharing it.
According to you the law was done away with 2000 yrs ago.
You aren't that old....
Now, you accepted Christ....why?
To go from condemnation to grace, right? To go from hell (the 2nd death) to eternal life, right?
Well, what condemned you that you would flee to Christ?
Answer: The law!
Excuse my language, but you are an idiot! Read what I have stated. Have I endeavored to place you under law? No!!!!
Its still ok, since even Atheists pick up the Bible to mock it, to deride it, and yet when read, there is power in such words, yes even those living words, and they are converted by the Holy Spirit through them.The Pentecostal lady makes a habit of studying what she calls "cult literature"; she has quite a collection of JW and SDA books and some Mormon ones too.
I do not think she mocks the books she has, she just sees the teaching in them as heterodox.Its still ok, since even Atheists pick up the Bible to mock it, to deride it, and yet when read, there is power in such words, yes even those living words, and they are converted by the Holy Spirit through them.
Well Paul was raised as a Jew now wasn't he. All he knew was the law. Paul is speaking of his own experience.Well, Paul says different:
Romans 7:7 I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, "YOU SHALL NOT COVET."
Well Paul was raised as a Jew now wasn't he. All he knew was the law. Paul is speaking of his own experience.
*ahem*, madame [as all], may we kindly return to OP questions. There was a statement you had earlier made about certain thoughts towards the Book Great Controversy, what were they?, please be specific.Well ...
I started a thread some time ago about specific chapters in that book. I bet LLoJ could resurrect it if he wanted to... thoughts towards the Book Great Controversy, what were they?, please be specific.
I find them silly. i find one to be a plagerism of a book written by a man earlier that year.(a book I also find silly) The premise of a woman following the teachings of a false prophet becoming a prophet teaching much the same doesn't lend well to non fiction.*ahem*, madame [as all], may we kindly return to OP questions. There was a statement you had earlier made about certain thoughts towards the Book Great Controversy, what were they?, please be specific.
What then of the Desire of Ages? What think you of it?
Really? Which man, which pages, which references please? Specifics please, less generalities. Have you considered the thorough work of DJ Conklin about such 'charges'? Additionally, 'silly' in what way?I find them silly. i find one to be a plagerism of a book written by a man earlier that year.(a book I also find silly) The premise of a woman following the teachings of a false prophet becoming a prophet teaching much the same doesn't lend well to non fiction.
A good number of your readers in this thread know that they do not want to become SDAsReally? Which man, which pages, which references please? Specifics please, less generalities. Have you considered the thorough work of DJ Conklin about such 'charges'? Additionally, 'silly' in what way?
The law of Moses in not the moral law. The law of Moses is the first, five books of the OT. It includes many laws....
Try to keep your laws straight.....
I am speaking of the moral law! Understand?
I suggest you look up that word fulfill.
Yes, I've read The Great Controversy. It's just a history book--and not a very accurate one--with anti-Roman Catholic emphases. I have always wondered where Ellen G. White picked up her copy and what its author had entitled the book.
Before you present the law as a standard for Christians living under grace (see Romans 13:8-14), you must first show how Christ fulfilled it and by so doing saved us from under law to under grace.
The believer isn't under law! He has been delivered from under it. Why? Because no one is keeping the law has Christ did. Therefore if you present the law as a standard before you present Christ as a fulfillment of the law, then legalism tends to slip in.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?