How long will it be before Kamala does an in-depth interview or even a press conference where she takes questions

[Hammster]

Maybe you've not been watching Trumps current speeches.

I’ve never watched one of his speeches.

 

[Aldebaran]

This obsession with CNN continues to baffle me.

Is that your way of saying, "Nothing to see here! Move along!" when CNN uncharacteristically posts things against someone on your side? If they said something against a conservative, you'd use CNN as if it were the arbiter of truth.

 

[public hermit]

I’ve never watched one of his speeches.

Have you watched him do an interview? Just a friendly suggestion: do yourself a favor and watch this interview. When he begins to talk policy, it becomes clear he has no plan. He has talking points, but there is no substance supporting them. He's just making it up as he goes. Lol. It's pretty amazing, actually.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Have you watched him do an interview? Just a friendly suggestion: do yourself a favor and watch this interview. When he begins to talk policy, it becomes clear he has no plan. He has talking points, but there is no substance supporting them. He's just making it up as he goes. Lol. It's pretty amazing, actually.

As opposed to the 77 seconds from Kamala? You know - the subject of this thread?

 

[public hermit]

As opposed to the 77 seconds from Kamala? You know - the subject of this thread?

I feel confident we'll be seeing more of her. I'm not worried about it. Are you?

 

[Hans Blaster]

Is that your way of saying, "Nothing to see here! Move along!" when CNN uncharacteristically posts things against someone on your side? If they said something against a conservative, you'd use CNN as if it were the arbiter of truth.

No, that's not what I'm saying. I frankly don't pay attention to what CNN or its hosts say or post. I do not watch their channel or read their web page. I don't even know what "CNN is saying" most of the time unless someone posts about it here. I'm just not interested in them.

What I find odd is the number of people on the right that confuse CNN with the Democratic party, "the Left", or any other such thing.

As for Smerconish, this is from the opening paragraph of his Wikipedia page: "A self-described "lifelong Republican" and former GOP administration appointee, he left the Republican party during the Obama administration." Why would any Democrat, Harris supporter, Leftist, Liberal, or Progressive consider him to be speaking for them? The "she's lost CNN" notion has little meaning generally, and certainly not "oh, she's lost Smerconish!". I can't speak for all of them, but who cares what Smerconish thinks or says.

 

[Always in His Presence]

I feel confident we'll be seeing more of her. I'm not worried about it. Are you?

Not for ten microseconds, am I worried, in fear, obsessing, over her in any way shape or form.

Pointing out the obvious is none of that.

Sort of like when everyone, including Harris were saying Joe was not going anywhere, that he was as sharp as ever - right up until the day he was forced out by those same people. There were people pointing out the obvious and those on the left asked us what we were afraid of - it's obvious how healthy and cogent Joe Biden it - why would you ask that.

Different day - same type of interaction.

There is a reason she is avoiding the press. One 77 second spot in almost a month.

We are back to the emperor has new clothes

 

[Hammster]

Have you watched him do an interview? Just a friendly suggestion: do yourself a favor and watch this interview. When he begins to talk policy, it becomes clear he has no plan. He has talking points, but there is no substance supporting them. He's just making it up as he goes. Lol. It's pretty amazing, actually.

I have no desire.

 

[Aldebaran]

I feel confident we'll be seeing more of her. I'm not worried about it. Are you?

We're actually looking forward to it. The debate will be golden, assuming she has the courage to show up for it.

 

[Ana the Ist]

Let’s be real. They could write you a letter,

I bet the letter would need to be outsourced to the lowest bidder.

you’ll complain they used black ink and not blue. They could cure cancer

You think they could cure cancer?

and you’d complain it wasn’t heart disease. They could make gas $1.25 a gallon and you’d complain it wasn’t $1.

If they could make gas 1.25 a gallon you should be upset with them too....why haven't they made it 1.25 a gallon?

There is nothing they can do to make you happy

This is becoming very meta.

and, if they did, you would contort yourself into a narrative to invalidate it because you don’t want them to make you happy.

They could defund the police...and you'd say crime was down because no one shows up when you call 911 anymore. Can't count a crime that the police didn't take a report on.

 

[Ana the Ist]

I understood it. I’m just bored of the “why won’t she talk to the press?”

Really?

I think it’s hilarious. A part of me wants her to win....then it's 8 years of jokes about the left....and the near vegetables they elect.

and when her talking to the press goes viral, it’s “that’s not what I meant,

Price gauging.

I mean why isn’t she giving press conferences,” and when she gives that it’ll be “that’s not what I meant, I mean why isn’t she giving interviews,”

Generally just something where she has to answer a question...

I think her interview with Walz was hard hitting. They should have sipped hot coco in front of a fireplace. So cozy.

and then when she does it’ll be “that’s not an interview because she was talking on a blue couch and interviews are actually done on white couches.”

Sure....that's a real complaint someone once made.

It would be more genuine if people just admitted they don’t like her

I think she's great as long as she's not in any position of authority.

and if they don’t have a reason to,

She's dumb and incompetent would be my reasons. I've never heard her say anything approaching even kind of smart....and despite 4 years as the second most powerful person in the WH....0 accomplishments.

they’ll keep moving the goalposts or inventing nonsensical reasons to be upset.

That's been my reason since 2021. She's had 3.5 years to either...

1. Say something smart.
2. Achieve anything.

And I would have changed my view of her.

 

[Always in His Presence]

bump

 

[Always in His Presence]

MSN

Vice President Kamala Harris and 2024 running mate Gov. Tim Walz took heat on social media for sharing clips of a "scripted and fake" interview they did with each other online while they continue to evade interviews.

Despite Harris not having a formal press conference or sit-down interview 25 days into her presidential campaign, both her and Walz have shared excerpts of their interview they conducted to generate hype for the ticket. The clip was met with ridicule from conservative critics who said it encapsulates the fakeness of Harris’ entire campaign.

"So your response to accusations of hiding from interviews is to put out a scripted conversation?"

 

[KCfromNC]

Vice President Kamala Harris and 2024 running mate Gov. Tim Walz took heat on social media

I appreciate that a thread complaining about the candidates uses an article talking about complaining about the candidates as evidence the complaints are justified.

 

[Always in His Presence]

26 days and counting

 

[Always in His Presence]

CNN Commentator Torches DNC for Not Offering a ‘Concrete Idea’ of What Harris Would Do as President​

CNN conservative commentator Scott Jennings is taking the Democratic National Convention for not offering a clear vision of what Vice President Kamala Harris would hope to accomplish if she is elected.​

​

During a segment on Wednesday night, Jennings said, “Nobody tonight said a (expletive deleted), thing. They want you to vote for a ticket based on absolutely no concrete idea about what they would do once they get in office.”​

​

Please note: the expletive is in a direct quote from a CNN commentator.

 

[Always in His Presence]

CNN's Erin Burnett questions whether it's 'better' for Harris to continue to decline interview requests​

Harris has gone 32 days without holding a press conference or giving a formal interview

 

[Hammster]

CNN's Erin Burnett questions whether it's 'better' for Harris to continue to decline interview requests​

Harris has gone 32 days without holding a press conference or giving a formal interview

But look how well she is doing.

 

[Aldebaran]

But look how well she is doing.

Maybe people who want her to win are afraid that if she talks, she'll end up looking as bad as Biden, and then she'll be forced out (for the sake of democracy, of course).

 

[Hammster]

Maybe people who want her to win are afraid that if she talks, she'll end up looking as bad as Biden, and then she'll be forced out (for the sake of democracy, of course).

Her handlers are especially afraid.