• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How Language Evolved from Climate and Terrain

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟356,992.00
Faith
Atheist
My point is, in a large plain area, the language tends to merge, rather than diverge. The distance can only slow down the process.
That makes no sense as it stands. If you start with one language and distribute the population speaking it into widely separated communities with limited communication, it can only diverge.
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,452
805
73
Chicago
✟138,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
That makes no sense as it stands. If you start with one language and distribute the population speaking it into widely separated communities with limited communication, it can only diverge.

But if they started with different languages, then the consequence is converge.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,286
7,502
31
Wales
✟431,564.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
But if they started with different languages, then the consequence is converge.

Not really. In Britain, Welsh (Cymraeg) is wholly distinct to Scots-Gaelic (Gaidhlig). In fact, Welsh is even more distinct to the Cornish language (Kernowek) even though they are separated by a distance of a couple of hundred miles at the most.
IN FACT, China disproves your point even further since China has 56 different and distinct languages.
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟356,992.00
Faith
Atheist
But if they started with different languages, then the consequence is converge.
That may be the case in the very long term, where there's a lot of intermixing of communities and/or one language becomes dominant, but it doesn't follow - for example, 'There are 1,250 to 2,100 and by some counts over 3,000 languages spoken natively in Africa..'. Africa is generally considered to be the birthplace of humanity, so has had the longest continuous human occupation, and is a single large area, so according to your idea there should have been language convergence...
 
Upvote 0

TagliatelliMonster

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2016
4,292
3,373
46
Brugge
✟81,672.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The language won't change so fast even by isolation. There must be other factors involved.

Just like in evolution, the amount of change will be proportional to the amount of time / generations that it is left to itself.

As others here have already told you, dialects can already be apparant between 2 villages only a few km's apart.

I live in a small community that is made up from 3 villages.
Total population of the community is about 10.000
To cross the entire community, passing through all 3 villages, takes 10 kms at most.

And even here, we can tell who is from which village, purely by the pronounciation of certain words.


Also.... do I take your post here as you not accepting that French, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish all derive from Latin? Do you deny that the ancestors of these people, spoke Latin? Is that what you are saying?
 
Upvote 0

TagliatelliMonster

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2016
4,292
3,373
46
Brugge
✟81,672.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
But if they started with different languages, then the consequence is converge.

Really?

You might not want to say that out loud in certain parts of Belgium.
The north speaks Dutch. The south speaks French. This has been a point of discussion and conflict all the way back to the 1200s, accumulating in a rather bloody war in 1302, known as "De Guldensporenslag" (don't know what the name is in english and to lazy to look it up). The franks against the dutch.

Since 1830, both the north and the south are united in the country called Belgium.
But french is still french and dutch is still dutch.

There has been some inter-mixing, sure. Certain french words have been adapted and included into belgian dutch dialects in communities near the "language border", but that's about it.

That hardly qualifies as "convergence".
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0