When Atheists request evidence for God, they're referring to a visual and physical appearance of the Creator God recorded in the book of Genesis.
But the fact that no amount of chemical reactions can ever become self-aware is not only self-evident that a Creator exists, but it's also self-explanatory.
So the viewpoint in question here is the one claiming to have the "physical evidence" of chemical reactions becoming conscious.
And according to Atheism's definition of evidence, there are only 3 dimensions that make up our physical reality, which is based on the concepts of pure naturalism and materialism historically.
As well as scientific Atheism during the Bolshevik Communist revolution as a propaganda method to influence others towards Atheism and anti-theism.
But since then we now understand that molecular mechanisms are apart of a much larger apparatus called a "system", and the only way for a system to come into existence is by the action of creativity, because the functionality of a system is what's considered to be a natural process, but the inventing of a system requires an inventor.
So the only plausible explanation for the existence of biological systems is that they were designed, and there are no other examples that can demonstrate what the cause was for the existence of systems.
And what all of this means is that it does not matter how strong an Atheists faith in denial is, in regards to the supernatural, it will always be the only explanation because the origin of life was not a natural event according to the facts.
The proper definition of "evidence" is not only based on physical evidence, which is what's open to interpretation of course, but also according to demonstration.
Now if the proof that is required here is found during the procedure of demonstration then please, will someone demonstrate how natural selection can organise chemicals into a living cell?
Because not only is this a stupid notion as there is nothing for natural selection to select from, but also because accumulative mutations cannot improve an organism over time.
And a pedigree animal is a perfect example of how accumulative mutations cannot improve the survivability of any organism over time, especially when reintroduced back into the wild.
According to the principles of physics and systems theory, spacetime cannot cause matter to arrange a complex system from multiple mechanisms that are non-existent to begin with, because the instructions for each mechanism, and the overall system itself are missing from the process.
So the evidence of a Creator outside of this plane of existence is found not only from the physics and chemistry demonstration that I've mentioned, but also from the principles of linguistics.
Instructional information could not have originated from nature alone, but from the ability of a Creator God outside of this system, because instructional information does not come naturally from any of the 10 dimensions of reality, which means by way of demonstration that the origin of instructions was supernatural.
Resources:
What are the 7 dimensions of physics?
They are mass, length, time, temperature, electric current, luminous intensity and amount of substance. Physical quantities can be expressed in terms of these fundamental quantities. These seven quantities are the seven dimensions of the physical world.
Do 10 dimensions exist?
Superstring theory posits that the universe exists in 10 dimensions at once. Beyond these three visible dimensions, scientists believe that there may be many more. ... In fact, the theoretical framework of Superstring Theory posits that the universe exists in ten different dimensions.
But the fact that no amount of chemical reactions can ever become self-aware is not only self-evident that a Creator exists, but it's also self-explanatory.
So the viewpoint in question here is the one claiming to have the "physical evidence" of chemical reactions becoming conscious.
And according to Atheism's definition of evidence, there are only 3 dimensions that make up our physical reality, which is based on the concepts of pure naturalism and materialism historically.
As well as scientific Atheism during the Bolshevik Communist revolution as a propaganda method to influence others towards Atheism and anti-theism.
But since then we now understand that molecular mechanisms are apart of a much larger apparatus called a "system", and the only way for a system to come into existence is by the action of creativity, because the functionality of a system is what's considered to be a natural process, but the inventing of a system requires an inventor.
So the only plausible explanation for the existence of biological systems is that they were designed, and there are no other examples that can demonstrate what the cause was for the existence of systems.
And what all of this means is that it does not matter how strong an Atheists faith in denial is, in regards to the supernatural, it will always be the only explanation because the origin of life was not a natural event according to the facts.
The proper definition of "evidence" is not only based on physical evidence, which is what's open to interpretation of course, but also according to demonstration.
Now if the proof that is required here is found during the procedure of demonstration then please, will someone demonstrate how natural selection can organise chemicals into a living cell?
Because not only is this a stupid notion as there is nothing for natural selection to select from, but also because accumulative mutations cannot improve an organism over time.
And a pedigree animal is a perfect example of how accumulative mutations cannot improve the survivability of any organism over time, especially when reintroduced back into the wild.
According to the principles of physics and systems theory, spacetime cannot cause matter to arrange a complex system from multiple mechanisms that are non-existent to begin with, because the instructions for each mechanism, and the overall system itself are missing from the process.
So the evidence of a Creator outside of this plane of existence is found not only from the physics and chemistry demonstration that I've mentioned, but also from the principles of linguistics.
Instructional information could not have originated from nature alone, but from the ability of a Creator God outside of this system, because instructional information does not come naturally from any of the 10 dimensions of reality, which means by way of demonstration that the origin of instructions was supernatural.
Resources:
What are the 7 dimensions of physics?
They are mass, length, time, temperature, electric current, luminous intensity and amount of substance. Physical quantities can be expressed in terms of these fundamental quantities. These seven quantities are the seven dimensions of the physical world.
Do 10 dimensions exist?
Superstring theory posits that the universe exists in 10 dimensions at once. Beyond these three visible dimensions, scientists believe that there may be many more. ... In fact, the theoretical framework of Superstring Theory posits that the universe exists in ten different dimensions.
