• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

MJ Only How is Isaiah 9:6-7 interpreted?

EJ M

Active Member
Site Supporter
Apr 1, 2018
254
123
MT
✟126,009.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Isa 9:6-7
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given:
and the government shall be upon his shoulder:
and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God,
The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end,
upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom,
to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice
from henceforth even for ever.
The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this.
Could someone please post the Rabbinic explanation for these verses.
Does Rabbinical Judaism believe this is the coming Messiah?
I read the Rabbinic explanation for Isaiah 53 was applied to national Israel, but I haven't
found an explanation for Isaiah 9.
Also, how is the timeline of the 70 weeks of Dan 9 explained?
Thank you.
 

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others


Here is the correct translation.

Isaiah 9:6

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: And the government shall be upon his shoulders: And he shall be called Wonderful Counselor of the Mighty God and Everlasting Father; (שַׂר / minister-ing) in peace.


שַׂר minister
 
Reactions: tampasteve
Upvote 0

tampasteve

Not everyone who says, “Lord, Lord,” will be saved
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Site Supporter
May 15, 2017
27,359
7,925
Tampa
✟946,407.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Many interpret the passage as speaking of Hezekiah. Personally I agree with this interpretation. It could have a dual prophesy, but I do not see this passage as that.
 
Upvote 0

Shimshon

Well-Known Member
Oct 5, 2004
4,355
887
Zion
✟114,964.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
In rabbinical Judaism Isaiah 9:5-6 is said to be Israel, king Hezekiah, or a messiah from each or any generation.

Here are some rabbinical explanations being referred to in the Targums and Babylonian Talmud among others.
From HaDavar Ministries
 
Reactions: AbbaLove
Upvote 0

gadar perets

Messianic Hebrew
May 11, 2016
4,252
1,042
71
NC
Visit site
✟138,496.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
This is not a faithful translation since the words I put in bold are not in the Hebrew text. Neither is the KJV and other versions that add the article "the"; "The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace."

I believe a faithful and correct translation is as follows;

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called wonderful, counsellor, mighty warrior, father of eternity, prince of peace.
There are at least 27 names in the Bible with the same Hebrew construction as in this verse. Each one means the "father of (something)." For example, Abishua means "father of plenty." Instead of translating the phrase in Isaiah 9:6 as "father of eternity," the KJV reversed the sequence making the true meaning harder to discern. Several newer versions correct this mistake such as The Emphasized Bible, The Bible in Basic English, The New American Bible, The Holy Bible; A Translation From the Latin Vulgate in the Light of the Hebrew and Greek Originals, and The New English Bible, just to name a few. Yeshua is the Father of Eternity because eternal life comes to us through him. And so it is written in Hebrew 5:9, "And being made perfect, he became the author (or father) of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;"
 
Upvote 0

AbbaLove

Circumcism Of The Heart
May 16, 2015
2,770
787
✟166,088.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
In Relationship

How does Rabbinic Judaism rationally/intellectually interpret this verse as referring to king Hezekiah? You've got to wonder if [secretly] Rabbinic Judaism actually believes that Yeshua may have been Israel's Messiah. But are unwilling to accept the possibility that the ruling elite (e.g. Pharisees) actually perpetuated a lie as participants of one of the greatest (blatant) coverups in human history? Certainly they were aware of reports that Yeshua had been sited for as much as 40 days after First Fruits. ... And then what about the saints that came out of their tombs and were seen in Israel and other unexplained occurrences?
 
Upvote 0

Dkh587

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2014
3,049
1,770
Southeast
✟598,910.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Thank you.

Do you have any insight on the variance of the Septuagint?

Isaiah 9:6-7 LXX
 
Upvote 0

EJ M

Active Member
Site Supporter
Apr 1, 2018
254
123
MT
✟126,009.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Iv'e wondered the same thing myself and believe that they secretly wonder about Yeshua being the Messiah, but then look to the conduct of "Christians" and the horrors they endured for the last 2,000 years and decide, no.
Not based on what Yeshua said and did but what His "followers" said and did. Sad at the slaughter and persecution done in His name.
Interesting though that "heretics" were slaughtered in greater numbers than God's chosen people.
At homecomers.org/mirror, a 1660 publication, it is recorded many hundreds, possibly thousands of Jews discovered Yeshua was indeed the Messiah and came to be baptized.
The record is found on pages 214, 215.
 
Reactions: AbbaLove
Upvote 0

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

There is no place in scriptures where Yahshua says he is The Father. שַׂר minister is correct. Use Google translate to see: https://translate.google.com/
 
Upvote 0

visionary

Your God is my God... Ruth said, so say I.
Site Supporter
Mar 25, 2004
56,978
8,072
✟542,711.44
Gender
Female
Faith
Messianic
Given that the Talmud was written before Yeshua walked the earth, the interpretations recorded and carried forward to this day still apply to those who are not taught about Yeshua.
 
Upvote 0

gadar perets

Messianic Hebrew
May 11, 2016
4,252
1,042
71
NC
Visit site
✟138,496.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
There is no place in scriptures where Yahshua says he is The Father. שַׂר minister is correct. Use Google translate to see: https://translate.google.com/
There is a big difference between calling Yeshua "The Father" and calling him the father of eternity. Are you questioning that Yeshua is not a father in any sense? If so, explain Isaiah 53:10.

Also, google translate is prone to error. I have tried translating non-Biblical material and the translation makes no sense. All Hebrew lexicons show שַׂר to mean prince. I have yet to see a lexicon that uses "minister".
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

gadar perets

Messianic Hebrew
May 11, 2016
4,252
1,042
71
NC
Visit site
✟138,496.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Thank you.

Do you have any insight on the variance of the Septuagint?

Isaiah 9:6-7 LXX
Isaiah 9:6 For a child is born to us, and a son is given to us, whose government is upon his shoulder: and his name is called the Messenger of great counsel: for I will bring peace upon the princes, and health to him.
This is so radically different from the Masoretic text. One can only surmise that the LXX was either translating from a different Hebrew text or one of the texts is wrong.
 
Upvote 0

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I did not see anything in Isaiah 53 that suggest that Yahshua is a Father.

This study is done from the N.I.V Exhaustive Concordance.

The two words of this study are, (PRINCE-S) and LEAD-ER-S-ING).

The Hebrew word (NASIY). Ref # 5954 is used 39 times for the word (PRINCE-S).
And the Hebrew word (SAR). Ref # 8569 is used 51 times for the word (PRINCE-S).

As you can see NASIY and SAR are very different words.

The word SAR is used a total of 421 times; 78 times as officials, 110 times as commander-s and 32 times as officer-s. And 40 times as Lead-er-s-ing.

The correct translation for Daniel 12:1 is “minister.” And the correct translation for Isaiah 9:6 is "leading or ministering."

The other alternate Hebrew words for PRINCE are these.
5592. NAGIYD (PRINCE) 3 times. / 5618. NADIYB (PRINCE-S) 6 times. / 5687. NAZIYR (PRINCE-S) 3 times. / 5817. NASIYK (PRINCE-S). 3 times.

You should take notice that they all began with the letters " N A ".

In Daniel 11:22 the word PRINCE is #5592 NAGIYD.

In our different bible, interpretations are often given in place of translations.
It's something to think about.

Prince Minister Leader Sar


Brown-Driver-Briggs makes a very good argument for the word "sar" meaning royalty, in Assyrian. (King)


However, using another language to translate a word can be both helpful, and misleading. What they did not take into consideration is the fact that royalty also acted as ministers. (As in, ministering in peace.) Or (Minister of the faith.) The Hebrew word "Sar" is best translated as "Minister." The Hebrew word "Sar" should never be given a translation as having to do with royalty.



Brown-Driver-Briggs

שַׂר420 noun masculine chieftain, chief, ruler, official, captain, prince (Late Hebrew especially of angels; Assyrian šarru, king)
 
Upvote 0

gadar perets

Messianic Hebrew
May 11, 2016
4,252
1,042
71
NC
Visit site
✟138,496.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I did not see anything in Isaiah 53 that suggest that Yahshua is a Father.
How can Yeshua have "seed" unless he is a father in some sense?

This study is done from the N.I.V Exhaustive Concordance.
I have no problem with translating sar as "chieftain, chief, ruler, official, captain, prince". I have a problem with "minister". Unless you show me in a lexicon the meaning "minister", I must reject it. You can't just pull definitions out of a hat.

As for sar never having to do with royalty, is Yeshua the son of a King? Yes. Therefore he is a prince.
 
Upvote 0

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Have a nice day.
 
Upvote 0

gadar perets

Messianic Hebrew
May 11, 2016
4,252
1,042
71
NC
Visit site
✟138,496.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Have a nice day.
You are developing a bad habit of running away from questions you can't answer or issues where you are proven wrong. Why not just be honest and say, "I don't know the answers to your questions, but I'll look into it further"?
 
Upvote 0

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
You are developing a bad habit of running away from questions you can't answer or issues where you are proven wrong. Why not just be honest and say, "I don't know the answers to your questions, but I'll look into it further"?
Your questions are not logical or rational. I can not reason with a person who is not reasonable.
 
Upvote 0

gadar perets

Messianic Hebrew
May 11, 2016
4,252
1,042
71
NC
Visit site
✟138,496.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Your questions are not logical or rational. I can not reason with a person who is not reasonable.
"How can Yeshua have "seed" unless he is a father in some sense?" Is a perfectly logical and rational question. I will rephrase it for you. Isaiah 53:10 mentions Yeshua's "seed". What is that seed and how does it relate to Yeshua? He obviously does not have any literal seed as in fathering literal children since we have no record of that or of him being married. So it must be referring to figurative seed that he has fathered in a figurative sense. Explain to me how I am misunderstanding that verse.
 
Upvote 0

CherubRam

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2012
6,777
781
✟103,730.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oneness
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
His (seed) are the converts.
 
Upvote 0

gadar perets

Messianic Hebrew
May 11, 2016
4,252
1,042
71
NC
Visit site
✟138,496.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
His (seed) are the converts.
Exactly. So he is a "father" of the converts in the same sense that Paul says "I write not these things to shame you, but as my beloved sons I warn you. For though you have ten thousand instructors in Messiah, yet have you not many fathers: for in Messiah Yeshua I have begotten you through the gospel." (1 Corinthians 4:14-15). However, he is NOT our Heavenly Father.
 
Reactions: Dkh587
Upvote 0