MrPolo
Woe those who call evil good + good evil. Is 5:20
Okay, now I see just a little better where you are coming from ...
The Scriptures + Catholic transmitted teachings = the Word.
Sorry, but I don't quite buy into your reasoning. There's the matter of 2 Timothy 3:16-17, 2 Peter 1:3, 1 Peter 4:11a, and James 1:21-25, for starters.
However, it does explain about the Mass and why I can't find anything about it in the New Testament. It's one of those Catholic transmitted teachings, right? Sometime after the first century, right? Outside of the written word of God, of course I'm referring to the "inspired" writings - the ones confirmed by the Lord and His apostles, right?
In essence, this discussion isn't really about the Mass per se, but about discerning the difference between the traditions of those who faithfully followed God versus those who followed the traditions of men as foretold in 1 Timothy 4:1-3, right?
Scripture and Tradition contain divine revelation, which is the Word, Jesus Christ Himself. No Tradition can contradict a teaching of Scripture, nor vice versa. If you recognize that we are to follow traditions from God, I do not understand why, de facto, you would then dismiss the mass )which you said you did not see in Scripture about breaking of the bread or the prophesies of the Old Testament I cited). Again, the Didache is a 1st century doc and includes forms of the mass. But even if a doctrine developed in the 2nd century or beyond, that assumes that doctrines cannot develop. But Jesus can show us part of a truth first and another part later (e.g. Mk 8:22-25).
If you wish to learn more, it indeed sounds like it is not the mass that is at issue but the scope of revelation. Is revelation in written form only? I'd find a book explaining Scripture & Tradition.
Upvote
0