• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How I know there is no God

Skavau

Ode to the Forgotten Few
Sep 6, 2007
5,823
665
England
✟57,397.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
DoubtingThomas29 said:
I feel that if we know religion is man made, for instance we know Mohammed did not talk to an angle in a cave. Then we can conclude only one thing God is a man made idea here

This much is true. The concept of a God is very much man-made.

DoubtingThomas29 said:
If God created man then there would b e evidence of that, and all we have is an absence of evidence.
How do you know that if we were created by a God that there would be evidence of such? There is an absence of evidence, but it does not mean that there is no God. It just means there is no evidence of one.

As I said: God is beyond religious thought. Who is to say that a Deistic God did not create the universe?
 
Upvote 0

DoubtingThomas29

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2007
1,358
79
✟24,402.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I feel that a lot of people have a different idea of how to define God. Describing God is like describing Heaven, people just start fantasizing and make up whatever.

Forexample some people define God to be that which made the universe and all life on the Earth. If that is your definition of God then yes I believe in God because it was evolution that made the whole universe and the Earth and all life on the Earth. You had cosmological evolution and biological evolution that made everything out of less than two hundred different elements off of the periodic table. The periodic table is natures alphabet.

Just as our 26 letters make up every word in our language, the elements on the periodic table make up everything in the universe. It is so cool to know that.
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,160
3,179
Oregon
✟940,608.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
Forexample some people define God to be that which made the universe and all life on the Earth.
For me and where I experience my Beloved God I'd have to say that God IS the universe and all life on Earth. Saying that God "made" it all and than stepped back is not the right angle of the experience of God for me. But that's how I "experience" God. It IS NOT how I define God.

If I were to define my Beloved God I'd have to say things like: The mind of God is the total sum of all of the thoughts that have ever been thought, plus all of the thoughts being thought right now, plus all of the thoughts that will ever be thought of in the future.

.

.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Evolution is unrelated to the cosmology and abiogenesis. It only deals with self-replicating systems and the frequency of traits thereof.
It is Hovind and his ilk that tried to redefine Evolution to incorporate the formation of the universe, etc.
 
Upvote 0

Crujir

SCHWAN MAN HUNGRY!
Nov 12, 2005
22,404
852
37
Roseburg, Oregon
✟48,417.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A fly, is a fly, is a fly. You never see a fly be anything but a fly. Okay, the occasional horsefly. If we evolved from apes, why are apes still here?

The process of evolution and/or random creation simply does not make sense. I honestly believe that the Big Bang is probably true. But does not physics show us that there has to be energy behind everything? Where did that energy come from?

Also to consider that we were created by a series of systematically fortunate events, considering how complicated even one tiny strand of DNA is, is like saying you can shake a puzzle box and have it fall into place. What are the chances? Hmm...

www.doesgodexist.org

May you be blessed

Cru
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
A fly, is a fly, is a fly. You never see a fly be anything but a fly. Okay, the occasional horsefly. If we evolved from apes, why are apes still here?
If Americans came from Europeans, why do Europeans still exist?
Nothing about evolution implies that the old species should disappear.
And for the record, we are apes. We are also monkeys.

The process of evolution and/or random creation simply does not make sense. I honestly believe that the Big Bang is probably true. But does not physics show us that there has to be energy behind everything? Where did that energy come from?
Where did your God come from?
Whatever answer you give to that, can be applied to the 'Where did energy come from?' question.

Also to consider that we were created by a series of systematically fortunate events, considering how complicated even one tiny strand of DNA is, is like saying you can shake a puzzle box and have it fall into place. What are the chances?
Your analogy is flawed: evolution does not imply that everything just 'happened' to pop into place 'just so'. There is nothing accidental about it.

Hello again, Crujir
 
Upvote 0
N

NavyGuy7

Guest
((I'll have fun with this and go all Phoenix Wright style on you))

If Americans came from Europeans, why do Europeans still exist?
"Objection!"
But there's one big difference; that is a statement of CULTURE, not race. Humans are humans. Thus this is irrelevant to the discussion at hand.

Nothing about evolution implies that the old species should disappear.
And for the record, we are apes. We are also monkeys.

"Objection!"

But then, what you seem to be implying would not be Evolution with the big E, but evolution in regards to "adaptation". Of course, I'm talking about the "old species" thing, not the "we came from apes" thing. A white moth can adapt into a black one if it's environment changes and affects the moth's "camoflauge" by changing the white bark to black bark, making the moth easily spotted by predators. Thus in order to survive, adaptation becomes necessary. Humans and apes are different species. Though we are similar, there is no proof we came from this species, nor of Evolution itself. Give me some cold hard facts that we came from apes. And I mean what I say in that last statement. Cold....HARD..... FACTS!!!!!
* points finger as he says this last word*

LOL, that was fun.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
((I'll have fun with this and go all Phoenix Wright style on you))

"Objection!"
But there's one big difference; that is a statement of CULTURE, not race. Humans are humans. Thus this is irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
Agreed, but the analogy is pertinant: the plaintiff made an appeal to distinctions between species which, under the evolutionary worldview, are as relevant as the European/American distinction.

Humans are but one of many ape species, with each member as evolved as the other (generation gaps notwithstanding). Humans are not the latest edition of apes, but a group of apes that are as 'modern' as any other ape species.

The plaintiff asks why other apes remain. The real question is why the plaintiff expects no other apes to remain.
"Objection!"
But then, what you seem to be implying would not be Evolution with the big E, but evolution in regards to "adaptation".
Your honour, I fail to see the distinction.

Objection, unreasonably high standards of proof. The plaintiff's defense is also holding a double standard.

Nevertheless, this article gives a comprehensive list of hominid species (complete with their respective fossils) which trace the descent of humanity, as it were.


LOL, that was fun.
Overruled.
 
Upvote 0

Crujir

SCHWAN MAN HUNGRY!
Nov 12, 2005
22,404
852
37
Roseburg, Oregon
✟48,417.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Consider this; if God is the creator of all things; time, space, energy, matter, and science as we know it, how then can you ask how God was created? Hmm...

And hello to you, too
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Consider this; if God is the creator of all things; time, space, energy, matter, and science as we know it, how then can you ask how God was created? Hmm...
Preciesly my point: if he created all things, where did he come from himself?
The typical answer to this is "he's always been". Philosophical quandries aside, why can't this answer apply to the universe, or to energy/matter?
 
Upvote 0

Teufelhund

Senior Veteran
Jul 29, 2007
2,778
103
37
Camp Pendleton, Ca
✟26,075.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Preciesly my point: if he created all things, where did he come from himself?
The typical answer to this is "he's always been". Philosophical quandries aside, why can't this answer apply to the universe, or to energy/matter?
Who are you to define what applies to the universe? We don't even understand a small fraction of it, much less all of it. God has always been is a fallacy, because in religious theory God does not exist in time, his was, and is, and forever will be. As he is present at all moments in time simultaneously.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Who are you to define what applies to the universe?
I simply asked, 'Why not?'. The buden of proof is on those who say there must be a First Cause.

So why can't energy/matter exist in such a state? Who are you to define what applies to the universe?
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
we can say that just before the singularity exploded, there was no time
Actually, we can't: to ask 'What happened before...?' implies that there was a 'before'. It makes no sense to ask what happened before time began, just as it makes no sense to ask what's North of the North pole.
 
Upvote 0
N

NavyGuy7

Guest
Geez, Wiccan, you sure play a good Miles Edgeworth with that latest ripping apart of my "objections". and i say it was still fun.
Though I can't really say we are a group of apes. Mammals, sure, we are, but apes, no i don't think so. For one, we may be similar, but with all the species in the world, something was bound to be similar to us. But I don't think "evolution" had anything to do with it.
I believe humans are different in a few ways, not just the physical. Apes really don't have their own forum, do they? LOL, thus we are different due to our "consciousness". We know we exist, and we also know we have a far greater potential than just scratching our butts all day. (though some of us do that anyway, but out of boredom and laziness). I always wondered what our place in nature was, and I figured it out.
We are adapters. We use whatever is at our disposal and, through a little creative thinking and knowledge, can make extraordinary things. Humans have this distinct advantage in this area over any other animal in the world. I have yet to see an ape create the first non-human light bulb on his own. I have yet to see them realize they are naked and make some clothing, ON THEIR OWN. Thus, if the evolution theory says we came from apes, why haven't the other apes tried adapting as we have? You'd think if we came from the same group, the others would eventually follow suit. But I still hold that the theory of evolution is incorrect. It makes no real sense, when one truly thinks about it. Plus, there is no real evidence to support it. If we came from apes, one would think there would be a skeleton of some sort in the transitioning stages, and have it be the real deal, too. Not just some sort of hoax like someone tried to pull once. But I still see no "decisive evidence". Thus one must assume the whole "wrong before proven" verdict over this whole mess. Making it just a theory, not truth. That is, if you are the type to be real scientific and whatnot.
Yes, I realize the whole evidence thing can be used against me, as well. But my statement still stands.
I suggest there is probably more evidence that God exists than that Evolution, or even the "big bang" (which is even more ridiculous, in my opinion, as there is even LESS evidence) is true. These two theories of Evolution and Big Bang do not hold up under the heat. Though stubbornness has been known to be very, uh, stubborn. Just another part of our humanity, I suppose, part of our "adaptation" abilities.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 21, 2006
1,204
37
✟24,187.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
NavyGuy7 said:
I suggest there is probably more evidence that God exists than that Evolution, or even the "big bang" (which is even more ridiculous, in my opinion, as there is even LESS evidence) is true.

More evidence for God than the Big Bang.....

Dude, physics, we did the calculations in class which show that the Big Bang, is the most obvious theory, all of our scientific data in physics points right at it

The thing with astrophysics, is we can look back in time, and if we look at how the universe progressed and the expansion of spacetime, we get the big bang as the most obvious answer, I really do not know what you base the lack of evidence for the Big bang on.......
 
Upvote 0

Crujir

SCHWAN MAN HUNGRY!
Nov 12, 2005
22,404
852
37
Roseburg, Oregon
✟48,417.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Lord God, I pray right now, that it is not our pride and defensive nature that reigns, but your love and glory in all this debate, that the truth would be revealed unto all who seek it, and unto all who reject it, and let them choose. Lord God, we bind every spirit that rises itself up against the knowledge of you and speak all truth. Let us bear the truth through Your love, peace, kindness and gentleness and not our pride as to create a battle where one falls and one stands. Let us all stand in Your presence, and as to whether or not Your "existence" is proven, may You be glorified in testing the faith of those who love You, Lord. Let those who love You not be ashamed, and let those who do not love You keep coming so that we may continually speak the truth to them. For we know that You love them no matter what they do, Lord. In the name of our mighty Savior Jesus, I pray.

Amen and amen
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Why not? If you concede that we are related to mammals, why not apes?

Why do you expect them to?

I have yet to see them realize they are naked and make some clothing, ON THEIR OWN.
A point: clothing is a necessity for humans who move beyond our evolutionary niche of Africa. It's somewhat colder elsewhere, hence the need for clothing.

Thus, if the evolution theory says we came from apes, why haven't the other apes tried adapting as we have? You'd think if we came from the same group, the others would eventually follow suit.
Why? Evolution is not progressive in the sense that all organisms are evolving to one goal (to which humans are the closest, presumably). Gorillas are just as evolved as us, but their brains never evolved like our brains did; there is no selective pressure to.

But I still hold that the theory of evolution is incorrect. It makes no real sense, when one truly thinks about it.
It explains all modern biodiversity on Earth. The entire field of biology does not make sense without it.
That you cannot comprehend it does not mean other people cannot either, nor does it invalidate the theory.

Plus, there is no real evidence to support it.
To which I cite:
If we came from apes, one would think there would be a skeleton of some sort in the transitioning stages,
Why? It is incredibly rare for an organism to fossilise; the conditions required are rather precise. Not to mention the fact that bones turn to dust in the hundreds of thousands of years involved.

and have it be the real deal, too. Not just some sort of hoax like someone tried to pull once.

Could you be anyone vague? My word...

But I still see no "decisive evidence". Thus one must assume the whole "wrong before proven" verdict over this whole mess. Making it just a theory, not truth. That is, if you are the type to be real scientific and whatnot.
As a scientist, I should hope that I am scientific (and whatnot). But you are making textbook mistake after textbook mistake:
  • Common descent has never been stated to be anything other than theory.
    • 'Theory' is not a bad thing. Ever heard of Germ theory? Atomic theory? Quantum theory? Gravitational theory?
  • No theory is proven. Just as limits never actually reach their limiting factor, neither do theories reach 100% certainity: there is always something that could disprove it. Nevertheless, when something is 99.999% certain, it's safe to say it happened.
    • Common descent is just a theory. There is evidence for it from almost every field of scientific inquiry.
Both theories have tremendous amounts of evidence to support them. To justify such a claim, you're going to have to start by presenting some evidence for the existance of God (I wouldn't mind a definition of 'God' either; this is science, after all).

These two theories of Evolution and Big Bang do not hold up under the heat. Though stubbornness has been known to be very, uh, stubborn. Just another part of our humanity, I suppose, part of our "adaptation" abilities.
Funny, you could say the exact same thing about religion.
 
Upvote 0

monkeypsycho62

Senior Member
Jul 1, 2007
893
26
Near Rochester
✟16,190.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,189691,00.html
 
Upvote 0