The laws of physics are always subservient to God, but that does not mean that God actively controls the laws of physics all the time.
Now let me ask you something. Is the movement that is going on in Asbury something that God has done?
Once again, why only go part way? Why not ask if the mangled distortions of humanity, or the rape of a child, is "something that God has done"?
Are you hoping for an answer like those who had hoped to trap Jesus, to whom Jesus replied,
"John’s baptism—where did it come from? Was it from heaven, or of human origin?” They discussed it among themselves and said, “If we say, ‘From heaven,’ he will ask, ‘Then why didn’t you believe him?’"? I'm not as clever as Jesus, so I can't say, "Neither do I answer your question."
Actually, I guess I could plead ignorance of the "movement that is going on in Asbury", but I can guess and I can look it up. But the answer will be the same: Whatever happens is by God's design, whether it is your next breath, or me making my coffee stronger than I had meant to, or even whether it is every detail of Hitler's atrocities. But if you take that to mean that I think God condones what is going on in Asbury, I don't mean that, nor do I mean that he does not condone it.
If, as I believe, everything but first cause (God) is an effect, though most effects are also causes —in other words, that the law of causation is absolutely pervasive— then, logically, first cause (God) has caused all things to come to pass.
And yes, that means down to the smallest part of the smallest particle of matter and energy, and what it does. "In him we live and move and have our being." But if you discard the law of causation as inapplicable in even one case, then you invoke the authority of chance, which is self-contradictory.