• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How does Trent align to scripture?

Status
Not open for further replies.

TraderJack

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,093
259
✟5,455.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
That type of misinformation

Talking about misinformation, Rome has excelled at it:

1)Donation of Constantine---fraudulent forgery used to deceive million

2) Pseudo-Isidorian Decretals----fraudulent forgery used to deceive millions

3) The Thesaurus of Greek Fathers---fraudulent forgery used to deceive millions

And that is for starters. Rome is well known for it's deceptive forgeries and invented information used to deceive millions.

There are many more than those 3, which are the better known ones.
 
Upvote 0

TraderJack

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,093
259
✟5,455.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single


If you are referring to post #18(#19 has nothing to do with canon 23 at all), then you are badly mistaken and have misread as well.

Here is what post #18 that gives canon 23 from the OP and the Roman source provided:



There is no change from "saith" to "believeth" at all. It appears that once again we have some Romans seeing things that do not exist again/

Something is definately up.
<staff edit>


And am I correct in understanding that the scripture references in the OP were put there by a non-Catholic source?
The OP is clear that the Scriptures that follow the canons are in comparison to the canons of Trent.
 
Upvote 0

TraderJack

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,093
259
✟5,455.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single

That is not needed. I have already proven conclusively that the canons rendered by the OP are identical to those rendered from the Roman source CC provided.

They are IDENTICAL.


"What we have heah is failure to read properly"
 
Upvote 0

TraderJack

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,093
259
✟5,455.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Originally Posted by BigNorsk

Conclusion not in evidence, everything taken from that site on this thread has been shown to be accurate....




And I have shown that the post you cite is another example of a Roman Catholic seeing things that do not exist, and is a misrepresentation of the facts.

You may want to see what you see, but the reality is you are not seeing what truly is in existence.
 
Upvote 0

TraderJack

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,093
259
✟5,455.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Has been to defend the stance of Romes "Trent" vs. Scripture... they have pretty much been attacks on the credibility of me OR my OP.

Trent must be indefensible.

That is a tactic seen all over by those who cannot defend their position, attack the source to try to demonize and impune the source. When lacking in truth that is a very common tactic.

It is seen here a lot.

For instance, a Roman will cite Tertullian or Origen, by lifting cherrypicked snippets out of context to try to make it appear as if they were pro-Roman papal.

But then, when they are cited IN CONTEXT, with the entirety of the passage they conveniently cherrypicked a snippet from that proves conclusively that neither were pro-Roman papal, but were directly opposed to any Roman papal supremacy, what do they do?

They attack Tertullian and Origen, saying they were heretics and not reliable sources. LOL
 
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Another false allegation refuted:
"Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff. -Unam Sanctum

I Like your Catechism better. Like the Bible, it only requires subjection to God.
Have a nice forever!
 
Upvote 0

TraderJack

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,093
259
✟5,455.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single


Unam Sanctum is supposedly an "ex cathedra", thus "infallible" declaration of "Divinely revealed truth" and cannot be changed.

But Lumen Gentium as cited from the catechism does indeed change it.

Wots up widdat?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.