Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, the odd belief that since water is a "universal solvent" that distilled water is dangerous. Water has very little flavor in most areas because even hard water has far less electrolytes and other solutes than does the food that we eat. Distilled water will not magically pull the calcium out of one's bones.If one is afraid of distilled water a reverse osmosis system is a good alternative. Also most of your electrolytes come from food, so no worries. Our tap water is very hard and tastes terrible, as is common all over. I've been drinking only distilled water for nearly 50 years, no problems yet.
Evolution has nothing to do with faith.I think the thing is, if you have believed in Evolution and you don't make a sustainable environment (out of your faith), you have basically wasted your time? You have not done anything constructive, with your substitute for "faith"?
It's not as if it is hard: you just take something you can do well and you communicate how to do it with more wisdom - that's it.
It helps if you can see this communication through with a defence of those not able to do it as easily as you: but the point is, if you have made it easier, you have already done as much as you can, at least spiritually.
I think the thing is, if you have believed in Evolution and you don't make a sustainable environment (out of your faith), you have basically wasted your time? You have not done anything constructive, with your substitute for "faith"?
It's not as if it is hard: you just take something you can do well and you communicate how to do it with more wisdom - that's it.
It helps if you can see this communication through with a defence of those not able to do it as easily as you: but the point is, if you have made it easier, you have already done as much as you can, at least spiritually.
I think Evolution may be the most applicable theory, as a question of urgency - but if that is to be more than a front, it will have to be thought out: what do we mean when we insist that Evolution is the most applicable response to this - a given example - of a sustainable environment.
If you close out competition, before weighing the load, you are not going to deliver the goods.
Evolution has nothing to do with faith.
What do you mean by "sustainable environment" and what does it have to do with faith?
People can accept evolution and have faith in things or not, however their personal belief systems work.
What does this have to do with evolution, faith or creating an environment for your self?
I don't understand what this has to do with evolution, faith or creating an environment for your self?
You're not making any sense. How does evolution work 'as a question of urgency'?
And evolution works best in an environment of competition. Hence the phrase 'survival of the fittest'.
That's the point: I am showing you how faith in God applies to your theory.
I don't know what you mean by 'Evolution', but it doesn't seem to be related to biological evolution or the theory of evolution. Biological evolution is a process that occurs in all populations of living organisms. It isn't something that can be 'introduced' to environments, it is characteristic of populations of living things.You are innocent of being called wilfully ignorant, I get that - but "faith" is something you have even when you have nothing else. It's not something that gets forgotten, if proof delivers you eggs instead of milk.
What I mean by "sustainable environment" is that when you first started to believe in Evolution, you did so in a particular environment. That environment was there, when you were busily populating your mind with ideas about how Evolution worked and what it worked for. Then you decided you "knew" what Evolution meant, and you stopped questioning it, and its relationship to that environment, which you felt had perhaps power, perhaps something else.
But there were other "environments" out there, to which Evolution could be introduced, with reference to the first understanding you had of Evolution, in a best case scenario. The point being, you were relying on Evolution being a sustainable concept, for the environment in which you found it and on the basis of that faith alone (the emphasis on faith) what you may not have realised, is that that same concept of Evolution, may be responsible to, or for or with, other environments - no selection pressure exists, without existing in a sustainable environment, for that "selection pressure".
That's what I mean when I say "sustainable environment".
You cannot exist as yourself, if you are dependent on an environment and that environment does not exist.
If there were no environment in which Evolution was true, Evolution would cease to exist (as a concept, in principle).
If you can stipulate where Evolution does and does not exist, you are able to create a working model of Evolution - not just a theory.
Birds create nests. Snakes develop venom.
What you do with what I say, is up to you?
I don't know what you mean by 'Evolution', but it doesn't seem to be related to biological evolution or the theory of evolution. Biological evolution is a process that occurs in all populations of living organisms. It isn't something that can be 'introduced' to environments, it is characteristic of populations of living things.
All populations have evolved and are evolving. Like it or not, mutations are a fact of life.For every population that you say is evolved, there is another population in the same environment, that is able to just live in that environment - without invoking Evolution, or a theory, or what ever you want.
No, it is rather clear that you do not understand the English language since your posts make no sense. When a person makes up their own meanings for terminology they have no grounds for complaint when no one else understands them.I know what this is.
It's a game.
You're trying to catch the walk, for the sake of the talk.
You're trying to say "I know how your feet work, so I'll do the talking with my mouth (not yours)".
You've forgot to make sure you know the reason, for your own faith!
I know what this is.
It's a game.
You're trying to catch the walk, for the sake of the talk.
You're trying to say "I know how your feet work, so I'll do the talking with my mouth (not yours)".
You've forgot to make sure you know the reason, for your own faith!
All populations have evolved and are evolving. Like it or not, mutations are a fact of life.
If everyone has faith, then how can there be a substitute for faith?You are innocent of being called wilfully ignorant, I get that - but "faith" is something you have even when you have nothing else. It's not something that gets forgotten, if proof delivers you eggs instead of milk.
I think you are using terms created to describe living things in the physical in to describe ideas and thoughts.What I mean by "sustainable environment" is that when you first started to believe in Evolution, you did so in a particular environment. That environment was there, when you were busily populating your mind with ideas about how Evolution worked and what it worked for. Then you decided you "knew" what Evolution meant, and you stopped questioning it, and its relationship to that environment, which you felt had perhaps power, perhaps something else.
But there were other "environments" out there, to which Evolution could be introduced, with reference to the first understanding you had of Evolution, in a best case scenario. The point being, you were relying on Evolution being a sustainable concept, for the environment in which you found it and on the basis of that faith alone (the emphasis on faith) what you may not have realised, is that that same concept of Evolution, may be responsible to, or for or with, other environments - no selection pressure exists, without existing in a sustainable environment, for that "selection pressure".
That's what I mean when I say "sustainable environment".
You cannot exist as yourself, if you are dependent on an environment and that environment does not exist.
If there were no environment in which Evolution was true, Evolution would cease to exist (as a concept, in principle).
If you can stipulate where Evolution does and does not exist, you are able to create a working model of Evolution - not just a theory.
I don't understand the relevance.Birds create nests. Snakes develop venom.
What you do with what I say, is up to you?
Yes, but even Darwin - Charles Darwin - said it mattered what environment they were in when they evolved.
Mutations in one environment, may be completely different in another.
You want me to bite? But I'm not biting - I'm just giving you straight up Evolution.
You are correct.Yes, but even Darwin - Charles Darwin - said it mattered what environment they were in when they evolved.
Mutations in one environment, may be completely different in another.
You want me to bite? But I'm not biting - I'm just giving you straight up Evolution.
What do you mean by "sustainable environment" and what does it have to do with faith?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?