Hi there,
So what I have worked out, is that the meme "Evolution" requires certain environmental conditions, in order to be sustainable. There has to be a stable culture, curiosity, repeatability and translateability. Without these things, Evolution is topical, but not relevant; interesting but not substantive; repeated, but not in an orderly fashion; translateable but not finally. In this sense, Evolution is attempting to become a lexicon, without validating the milieu in which it operates.
When Creationists say "God created the Heavens, and the Earth" they are agreeing with the Godly validation of the basis on which knowledge of these things (and more) are able to begin. It is a context, that establishes certain things will be found to reflect others, in as much as they can relate to others (specifically Heaven and Earth). Nowhere, does Creation say "all these things are true, as long as you keep one 'eye' closed". Connections are welcomed, because they further the understanding of what it is that God is able to use, to strengthen His Creation.
When Evolutionists say "populations evolve, not individuals" what they are saying is "look at Creation through only one 'eye'", in other words "we do not understand the culture in which Evolution develops, therefore we rule it out". But if Jesus returned and said "I don't believe in the individual" He would be laughed off Earth, for good! Everytime an Evolutionist says "'one' eye is enough" they are building up contempt that will one day be judged! The point is, that they should be studying the means by which Evolution is communicated, and how it is that by that communication a steady rate of cognition is achieved, in which one could be said to be in the Evolutionary "zone".
Not every "zone" is propitious to Evolution's propagation - not merely because of hostility to being objectified, in one way or another. A sloth for example, will relate to his Evolution at a much slower pace than other creatures. A giraffe may expect great groups of Evolution, to develop over time - so that there is a choice when it comes to trees, as to how tall they grow. This is the Evolutionary milieu that accommodates Evolution in certain ways, ways that in time give rise to a more coherent Evolutionary whole - welcoming species and their differences into a more and more unified expression of co-dependence.
From the point at which you work out: how it is you work things out - what is opened up to you is that creation is more dependent on itself, than any subset of inclusion can be on its own - this is the Nash Equilibrium for Nature. We are dependent on each other and can only reach beyond ourselves when part of the greater whole. This is not a context to be pitied, for what escapes it, but rather a possibility of reinclusion, where one Evolution out of the total possible would be exhausted and exhausted in principle because of refusal to integrate with the greater whole. You are in effect a greater target if you don't work together, even if what you are working with: is Evolution.
An Evolution that includes every possibility, is one that God can approve of (selah).