How many times do you need to be told that your myth predicts a population or genetic bottleneck worse than that of the cheetahs in not only Noah and company, but in all land life. The lack of that bottleneck is evidence that your myth is just a myth. Not only is it evidence for man's case, it is evidence in over 99.9% of all land life. It is a slam dunk that tells us that there was no flood.I'll ask a second time:
What genetic evidence?
You want genetic evidence of Adam, Seth, Enoch, Methuselah ... who?
The Nephilim?
Frankly, I don't understand what it is you're expecting to find; and I suspect you guys don't either.
Ummmmm . . . No. Try again. Oh and let's not forget the formal refutation:
How many times do you need to be told that your myth predicts a population or genetic bottleneck worse than that of the cheetahs in not only Noah and company, but in all land life.
If the Bible was correct, then all animals would display evidence of a genetic bottleneck caused by Noah's flood. There is no evidence of such a universal bottleneck. Therefore there was no flood and the Bible is wrong.
Done.
I didn't know that posting "smilies" was a formal refutation. If so, here's yours.
And here you go waving your hands again:False and UnScriptural. There were over a Million people on planet Earth when the Ark arrived. They were NOT Humans (descendants of Adam) until AFTER Noah's grandsons had children with them. Genesis 6:4 Does 8 plus a million constitute a bottleneck? Of course not but it does account for today's 7.7 Billion living Humans.
We've been through all this before, haven't we?
Then no one would have had time to pray the sinner's prayer.
QV please: My Sanitary Challenge
Do you think God left a scar behind when He took a rib from Adam?
Remove what genetic evidence?
God drowned everyone on Earth except for eight people.
Then He blessed those eight people and charged them to replenish the Earth.
Genesis 9:1 And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.
Without that blessing Earth would have never recovered from its population bottleneck.
Interesting that you see it as He trying to hide something.
Not so, since God is the Creator of both Humans and prehistoric people. The Ark arrived in the mountains of Ararat 11k years ago according to History. Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE Human civilization can be traced to the first farming (Adam farmed on his Earth with NO evolution) on our Earth.
Your ideas have just been proven wrong by HISTORY but don't feel bad since the SAME Historical Evidence also refutes the false ToE. Noah was the FIRST Human to take a step on planet Earth.
The Bible is correct as It stands, and anyone who says otherwise is wrong.
I can see why.If we have, you weren't able to provide any good answers then either.
I'll give you credit and say yours.Based on whose interpretation?
...then I'll say mine.If the Bible was correct, then all animals would display evidence of a genetic bottleneck caused by Noah's flood.
And you still do not understand what a conditional question is.I'll give you credit and say yours.
But if you disappoint me by agreeing with this remark:
...then I'll say mine.
But if you disappoint me by agreeing with this remark:
...then I'll say mine.
You can answer this challenge: My Sanitary ChallengeHow would you test your ideas?
And it shouts equally voluminous if you treat my posts with contempt.Subduction Zone said:A proper test has to have a possibility of failure. It shouts volumes if you have to cheat for your version of God.
And you believe in a restricted one, based on incomplete knowledge.I already know you believe in an inherently deceptive universe,
I am not going to one of your epic fail threads where you only demonstrate that you have no understanding. You have no valid test. Your test is a rather stupid waste of time and hypocritically you would not pay for it.We've been through this, haven't we?
You can answer this challenge: My Sanitary Challenge
And if you don't want to, then I already gave you a test you can perform here: Flood Physics.
And it shouts equally voluminous if you treat my posts with contempt.
You're just cheating yourself out of understanding.
Yes, reality is rather restrictive. Isn't that much better than positing a dishonest God.And you believe in a restricted one, based on incomplete knowledge.
And you believe in a restricted one, based on incomplete knowledge.
No, thank you.So in all that I posted, responding to each of your claims, this was the best you could do? A weak insult? I honestly expected more from you. Come on, you can do better. Care to try again, and actually RESPOND to my points this time?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?