• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How could we survive the horrors of heaven?

Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟102,547.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
In that case, can I ask you about the question in this thread?

How will you feel if whatever human you love most in the whole world goes to hell while you are in heaven? While you are spending eternity doing all these wonderful things, how will you feel to know that the person you love is roasting on a spit forever?
 
Upvote 0

Petros2015

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2016
5,205
4,426
53
undisclosed Bunker
✟318,751.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Honestly - yes. no support at all. I don't think you can make a case for the human soul being split into good and evil

Aye, but you have heard of similar concepts under different names such as purgatory or refinement - you've heard them applied and seen them historically misapplied to generate fear or profit or control or a gruesome indulgence of sadistic justice satisfaction fantasies. But the end result is a separation, a split if you will, of the impurities from something that was mixed and mingled.

All I've really done is to anthropomorphize the perspectives of both the purity and the impurity
I'm pretty sure there's at least ONE perspective present
But if there's 2, I expect one calls it Heaven and the other Hell
As Einstein once said, "it's all relative"

There are pictures of this here in the natural world, if one were to look for them.



Amusingly, the electrolysis process requires an electrolyte in the water. Such as Copper Sulphate.
But, Salt will do in a pinch.

Matthew 5:13

Also, apparently it requires a Sacrifice...

and have never heard any Christians say such a thing.

May I ask you a question? (and I waive site policy protection on this question for you and only you)
Do you consider me a Christian?
If not, what is your definition?
If so, please amend your statement in the future from "never heard any" to "once heard one"
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Par5

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2017
1,013
653
79
LONDONDERRY
✟69,175.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Sounds wonderful, but would I be able to play golf? Does heaven have golf courses? Would hate to think I had to spend eternity without getting at least a few rounds in. That wouldn't be heaven, that would be hell!
 
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,820
74
Las Vegas
✟263,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others


I do not believe the bibloe teaches an everlasting hell. There is a hell, all the wi9cked will go to it---and they burn "according to their works. So I'm sure that those that have the greeatesty sins, such as Hitler, will suffer longer, but they all will dioe berfore the easrth is remade. I have a brother that died doing drugs, I have my real mother that did some bad things. I have no doubt that during the 1000 years we will know what all have done and we will acknowledge that God's sentence is just---but I'm sure we will cry for them. After we die, our memories of them will beforgotten. Isa 65:17 For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.

But God remembers them for eternity and He will sorrow for them. But if He forgets our sins, when we ask, then I guess He can make Himself forget them. His sorrow for them is much greater than ours, for He knows what they could have been, and that they could have been with Him, also. He will wipe out the memories that would hurt us---but He alone can make Himself forget them, and He may sorrow for them for eternity.
 
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,820
74
Las Vegas
✟263,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Sounds wonderful, but would I be able to play golf? Does heaven have golf courses? Would hate to think I had to spend eternity without getting at least a few rounds in. That wouldn't be heaven, that would be hell!


LOL!! I don't see why there would not be golf! You can make your own golf cpourse in your own back yard.
 
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0

All Becomes New

Slave to Christ
Site Supporter
Oct 11, 2020
4,742
1,777
39
Twin Cities
Visit site
✟310,057.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Celibate

I would ask you how you know Isaiah isn't actually talking about the new heavens and new earth which are mentioned in Revelation.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,340
9,285
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,223,341.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Just exactly what is your meaning with this?
I am being called? Why?

I'll edit for clarity. That post was in response to the OP. I wanted to remind every person in the thread that we will forget this world because scripture says we will, contrary to the suggestion in the OP (post#1) that it is merely a "childish" hope. It's the opposite.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,340
9,285
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,223,341.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Full context and real listening is the only way to understand. Though I've read fully through Isaiah four times, I still humbly listen.

If you listen, you read sympathetically. It's the key to good reading.
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,194
6,997
71
USA
✟585,424.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

I would need more, but no matter, that hasn't happened and propably won't.

This from post 56 seems to say it all:

 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,340
9,285
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,223,341.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Do you love all your neighbors? Most people fall short.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟102,547.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I would ask you how you know Isaiah isn't actually talking about the new heavens and new earth which are mentioned in Revelation.
The thing is, Isaiah was not a Christian. He was an Israelite. He was not preparing the world for Christianity. He had no ideas Christianity was coming. All he was doing was giving an inspirational message about how things looked bad for Israel at the time that he was speaking, but God would make the nation of his believers great again.
If you read Isaiah in context, you see that he isn't talking about the fate of individual worshippers of Yahweh, much less Christians; he is talking about the fate of the country of Israel.
It is possible that he was speaking of a transformation of the earth and heavens, but more likely it was hyperbole, indicating how amazing the new Israel would become. Regardless, when he spoke of things being forgotten, he was not saying that individual people will forget things, especially not that they would forget about people who were in hell while they were in heaven. He was saying that Israel's sins and flaws would be forgotten.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟102,547.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Did I make a joke, @Halbhh ? I see you have rated my post as funny.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟102,547.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Full context and real listening is the only way to understand. Though I've read fully through Isaiah four times, I still humbly listen.

If you listen, you read sympathetically. It's the key to good reading.
I'm not sure that reading sympathetically is the right way to comprehend a difficult piece of text. I'd recommend reading critically, and considering context, as the keys to good reading.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟102,547.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I would need more, but no matter, that hasn't happened and propably won't.

This from post 56 seems to say it all:
I don't think that's what Isaiah was saying.
He was not a Christian, and he had no idea the Christians were coming. What he was talking about was how God would make Israel great again and how its sins would be forgiven and forgotten.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟102,547.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Do you love all your neighbors? Most people fall short.
No, I'm afraid I do not.
As I understand it, Christian teaching is that none of us are worthy to go to heaven because none of us are worthy; but we can go if God forgives us.
So, we see that loving is not enough to go to heaven, contrary to what you said earlier.
 
Upvote 0

All Becomes New

Slave to Christ
Site Supporter
Oct 11, 2020
4,742
1,777
39
Twin Cities
Visit site
✟310,057.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Celibate
Did I make a joke, @Halbhh ? I see you have rated my post as funny.

Your position is rather comical as much of Revelation is quoting books like Isaiah. Further, NONE of the Apostles were actually gentiles as such that they "invented" Christianity. Even Apostle Paul at length, uses OT scripture to demonstrate the Truth of the Gospel. They were Jewish and had a Jewish context of the OT. They used the OT to demonstrate certain Truths about Jesus. Revelation is a book of the Bible with a Jewish context in terms of it's relation to who is saved. And further, the idea that Paul "invented" Christianity is terribly misunderstood.

So the idea that Isaiah "wasn't a Christian" is just silly given what the Apostle John said about the new heavens and the new earth in Revelation, in which he quotes things from the book of Isaiah, Ezekiel, ect. It wasn't like the authors of the NT were actually trying to "invent" a new religion as much as how the authors of the NT understood things from their own Jewish perspective.

Now, you can argue that what Christians believe today doesn't reflect its Jewish roots, but that's an entirely different argument altogether.
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,194
6,997
71
USA
✟585,424.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I don't think that's what Isaiah was saying.
He was not a Christian, and he had no idea the Christians were coming. What he was talking about was how God would make Israel great again and how its sins would be forgiven and forgotten.

And it's so clear to me....oh well.
 
Upvote 0

Magnanimity

Active Member
Dec 13, 2020
124
94
Atlanta
✟32,238.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Hi all, I’m late to this discussion, since I’m new here. Only just got my 100 posts (go me!)

NB - this post is primarily directed to Christians who believe that a literal hell exists.

Interestingly, even though the essay that is the topic of discussion here mentions the “many Christian” thinkers who have pondered the nature of Hell, conspicuously absent are those who have argued for some limited, finite Hell. So, not denying that a Hell exists, just insisting that it must necessarily be finite in nature (with reasonable sentencing, possibility of parole, etc ) And this would comprise a great many thinkers throughout the church’s long history. (See DB Hart’s recent book on this issue.) The author mentions Tertullian, Augustine, jumps ahead to Aquinas and then onto Edwards. And that’s about right. If he were to trouble himself with the much more voluminous ancient Christian East, he’d have had a harder time locating defenders of eternal-Hell.

So where does that leave us? Christians themselves tell us that heaven is so hellish that to endure it, one’s memory of loved ones must be erased. Alternatively, one must be distracted, forever."

“Christians tell us...” In one sense, some Evangelicals, with their commitment to the Augustinian vision of Hell are, like Aquinas himself, in a bit of a quandary. And although Craig is a prominent Christian apologist, he is very far from speaking for “Christianity.” His memory wipe idea sounds very magical and hints at a peculiar naïveté regarding the psychology of human persons, it seems. Once we begin to explore the human person with some depth, I think we arrive at a view of humanity that is very much mutually entangled, intertwined and co-identified. As in, we contribute to the building up of each other.

Every mother has a bit of her child in her, and every child, some of her mother within. Their very selves are entangled such that it can some times be difficult to identify where the consciousness of one precisely ends and the other’s begins. So we have expressions like, “the apple hasn’t fallen far from the tree..” Something similar happens in various human relationships like spouses, siblings, best friends, etc. If this intermingled mutuality of personhood can be accepted, it becomes immediately evident that memory-wiping would be, quite literally, dehumanizing. To take away my memories of my child, which themselves form me at my very core, is to take away substantial portions of me. Keep up that process and you’ll have dwindled me down to nearly nothing, depending on how many close ones in my life didn’t make the cut.

But don’t imagine God would actually solve the problem and eliminate the injustice of perpetual conscious torment in hell

Hell only becomes unjust if we commit ourselves to the Augustinian notions of it being forever and inescapable. Thankfully, plenty of St Augustine’s peers didn’t accept his views and had rather hopeful eschatological views like a final reuniting of the entire human race back to God, in the end (eg, St Gregory of Nyssa). To say nothing of the very many other ancient, medieval and contemporary scholars who have held similar views to St Gregory and have rejected the Augustinian vision (without rejecting Hell, per se).

But as Hans Urs Von Balthasar noted in his hopeful book on this subject, the shadow of Augustine has loomed very large over the Western church. On this issue today, we are still having a hard time breaking free from the great saint’s bleak vision of the afterlife. But the author’s criticisms really only apply to the Augustinian view of Hell. There is nothing particularly odd or shocking about an immediate state in the afterlife which would be punitive and/or rehabilitative for folks who have committed horrendous evils here and gotten away with them, so long as that state has an end.
 
Upvote 0

Clizby WampusCat

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2019
3,657
893
56
Texas
✟124,923.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
In the end no one knows what he’ll is like. God has been irresponsibility vague on this issue, well on all issues. The proof is in the arguments and division between Christians on this and all issues.
 
Upvote 0

Magnanimity

Active Member
Dec 13, 2020
124
94
Atlanta
✟32,238.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
God has been irresponsibility vague on this issue, well on all issues.

I don’t know what to say about your personal judgment that being-vague on these issues of the afterlife is “irresponsible.” Plenty of folks have been ok with the very small amount of details provided, so long as it eventuates in a reality much better than this current one in important respects.

The proof is in the arguments and division between Christians on this and all issues.

There is an abundance that unites Christians, both in action and in beliefs. But I don’t see the problem with a lack of uniformity. Aren’t there goods that result from diversity? A tapestry of many colors, if you will. Or a symphonic harmony? There are many such analogies one could draw. It could be that uniformity is itself a less than ideal situation.
 
Upvote 0