• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How can you discern between the natural and the supernatural?

T

talquin

Guest
"God is so all real and absolute that no material sign of proof or no demonstration of so-called miracle may be offered in testimony of his reality. Always will we know him because we trust him, and our belief in him is wholly based on our personal participation in the divine manifestations of his infinite reality." UB 1955
At quick glance, that is far from sufficient evidence that a god or gods exist. But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and first ask what real thing is it you are calling "God"?

Can you provide any sufficient evidence that God does not exist?
Only if you posit a god which possesses contradictory attributes. See Problem of Evil for a good example. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmjFVP6qkiI
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,738
19,399
Colorado
✟541,674.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
If it's supernatural, and non-repeatable, how pray-tell will you, as a finite, limited human being, measure it, analyze it, or control for it in a comprehensive, scientific manner? Answer: you won't. This is why mainstream science leaves the supernatural out of the equation, and why we call this approach, "methodological materialism."

Phenomena that are super-natural are identified as "super" for the above reason; this is what "super" means. Thus, it is not a large problem to discern the difference between what we mean by nature and supernatural.
What phenomena?
 
Upvote 0

Cearbhall

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2013
15,118
5,744
United States
✟129,824.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
How can you discern between the natural and supernatural? Once a supernatural thing occurs within our physical world, it is no longer beyond the laws of the physical world and would therefore be part of the natural world.
Good point, but the supernatural doesn't exist, as far as I know, so I don't see this being a problem.
 
Upvote 0

AionPhanes

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2015
841
430
Michigan
✟25,674.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
My response here isn't critiquing anything you've said, rather I'm using the examples you raised, to explore ...

Good/ thought provoking exploration too. I've enjoyed reading it.

I'm aware of the concept of synchronicities, etc. At the most basic level, the Occam's Razor explanation is that they will always just be "coincidences", or instance of a person attempting to assign meaning to events and find patterns amongst the events. Since they may involve nothing more than a person's mind and reasoning, they are essentially and collectively easily dismissed by many as products of imagination...

Yes, especially if they are a rare occurrence. When they start happening left and right they are little harder to ignore however.

.....Thus: natural, but not in an extraordinary sense. This doesn't mean that there isn't something to them, just, at the most basic Occam's Razor explanation, they are typically not extraordinary. There would need to be signifficant enough events as to almost defy coincidence or chance.

The highlighted portion makes an important point imo. When one has a dream that merely appears to predict a single event it's rather easy to chalk it up to chance. When one has a dream that predicts multiple events in a very literal fashion it again becomes harder to ignore. I would talk about some of my dreams here specifically (as examples) but I think my priest / spiritual father would smack me if I did :D. I've always been told not to do things like that especially in public or online.

Prophetic or precognitive dreams are a bit more interesting, depending on factors. The more detailed they are, the more extraordinary they are, etc ... the more they may show *something* at work between how humans are able to make sense of events in the natural world extraordinary ways. But conversely, if they are riddled with too much symbolism and not enough detail, or are vague, then they are easily passed off as well as being nothing more than the imagination. However, the more extraordinary examples may show an interesting relationship between the way humans perceive information and events that unfold in the environment. Still natural, but if it's a legitimate phenomenon, the mechanism by which it works does not "stand out" apart from a human being as being the conduit, so to speak.

I'm in strong agreement with the first bolded statement above. The later bolded statement could be accurate as well imo. What reason would we have to call it "supernatural"? I'm not sure. It may simply be a natural human faculty that just isn't as well known as some of the others that we posses.

Physical healings are obviously more extraordinary, depending on context. But it's still taking place in the "natural", although the origin of the mechanism at work may point to something else, it's still reflected in the "natural". However if the healing isn't that remarkable (i.e. "My headache got better," or "My cancer got better over time,") ... then the Occam's Razor explanation would be more mundane causes behind the healing. If a limb were to grow back in the space of a minute (or perhaps even in the space of a couple of days) then that is obviously more extraordinary, but still ... it's taking place in the natural. Whatever the origin is, it's reflecting in the natural world.

No doubt. I've never seen a limb regrowing type thing before.


...Personally ... and I'm somewhat assuming a lot of things here about you (hopefully I'm not overstepping) ... but I'd bet that if you experienced more extraordinary phenomena that involved events that took place separate from your "mind" so to speak ... like stigmata (effects the body in a dramatic way), or meeting a person whom looked like a human being but was able to do things that defied physics as you knew it (i.e. translocate, or make cars appear and disappear in an instant, vanish, etc), then you *may* see a more direct link to the natural world and things ascribed to the "supernatural". The line between the two may lead one to conclude there is no line. Synchronicity, dreams ... still essentially deal with the mind. Which can lead one to conclude, "I'm either making this all up in my head, or I'm onto something," ... while things physically effecting your body, or happening to the environment around you apart from your mind ... are more extraordinary and may have a different effect on one's conclusions. Just a guess.

That's possible. One could say that all we experience directly in relation to "outside" phenomena** is our own mind (nervous system etc..) or our own phaneron. Even "external" things could be chalked up to "it's just my mind playing tricks on me " too if one wanted to be very skeptical. I've certainly had audio, visual, tactile, even olfactory experiences in certain altered states that I assume were "not really there" in a physical sense at least. Some people use that fact to simply reject anything out of the ordinary that happens to people if it doesn't leave a lasting observable effect. "You [or 'you people'], must have been hallucinating!" But, yes, the more dramatic outer experiences like something that appears to be a physical levitation, people glowing and emitting warmth, etc... would be more fantastic and might be harder to deny then say a common run of the mill prophetic dream.

** Not trying to rule anything out in terms of certain "mystic experiences" of noumena, gnosis, at one ment, the "thing in itself", or anything like that I'm just talking about normal experience of the "outside" phenomenal world.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
How can you discern between the natural and supernatural? Once a supernatural thing occurs within our physical world, it is no longer beyond the laws of the physical world and would therefore be part of the natural world.

You'd first have to provide a definition of the two terms in question. If you do this, I will answer the question.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,738
19,399
Colorado
✟541,674.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
You'd first have to provide a definition of the two terms in question. If you do this, I will answer the question.
How about......

Natural: any object and event of matter/energy.

Supernatural: anything else.
 
Upvote 0

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
Can you provide sufficient evidence that the supernatural or God exist?

Believers are evidence, their changed lives are evidence.

Do atheists love one another? A little? Do Satanists love one another? Perversely? Do Mormons love one another? At times? Do Amish love one another? Like family? Do Muslims love one another? Like brothers? Do Jews love one another? Like gods? Do Christians love one another? Like students? Do believers love one another? Like Christ?

All this is love, God is love.

Does that answer your question?
 
Upvote 0

variant

Happy Cat
Jun 14, 2005
23,790
6,591
✟315,332.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
If you had said, "Yes Jesus would be supernatural" I may have explored it further. You did essentially say that with "it kind of assumes an answer" ...

What kind of extensive objective information would suffice for you to determine if Jesus was "supernatural" or at least capable of supernatural abilities ? Lets forget Jesus for a moment, and say a man knocked on your door in the next 20 minutes and said, "I'm here to give you extensive objective information to make a determination of the supernatural, so go ahead and tell me what you need ..." what would suffice for you ?

I would probably need more than twenty minuets and more than a bit of equipment.

What would convince me would be clear enough objective and verifiable evidence that could rule out all possible natural explanations.

If Jesus was capable of super-naturalism in controlled environments then I am guessing it would be quite convincing though.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
How about......

Natural: any object and event of matter/energy.

Supernatural: anything else.

Thus, anything you can show me or anything a person can experience is natural.

Therefore the supernatural can never influence us.

Thus, we can conclude that a supernatural event is indistinguishable from an event that does not occur.

In other words, there's no difference between supernatural things and non-existent things.

In conclusion, the supernatural does not exist.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Believers are evidence, their changed lives are evidence.

Do atheists love one another? A little? Do Satanists love one another? Perversely? Do Mormons love one another? At times? Do Amish love one another? Like family? Do Muslims love one another? Like brothers? Do Jews love one another? Like gods? Do Christians love one another? Like students? Do believers love one another? Like Christ?

All this is love, God is love.

Does that answer your question?

Redefining things to claim they prove your point is intellectually dishonest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archaeopteryx
Upvote 0

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
Redefining things to claim they prove your point is intellectually dishonest.

I'm sorry but talquin asked for evidence, the evidence of the supernatural is the inexpressible and the evidence of the natural, a changed life. The diversity of the faith is inexpressible, the individual examples of it, changed lives. If you cannot see this as evidence, it is better that you stop looking.

Furthermore, to claim that love can make no point about evidence is disingenuous, we are all children of the love of our parents.
 
Upvote 0

TillICollapse

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2013
3,416
278
✟21,582.00
Gender
Male
Marital Status
Single
I would probably need more than twenty minuets and more than a bit of equipment.
No I meant that this individual would show up to your house 20 minutes from now, not that he would limit you to 20 minutes lol. Sorry if I didn't make that clear :)

What would convince me would be clear enough objective and verifiable evidence that could rule out all possible natural explanations.
Such as ?

If Jesus was capable of super-naturalism in controlled environments then I am guessing it would be quite convincing though.
This sounds like a supernatural Turing Test of sorts. Which brings us back to Clarke's 3rd law. If it can fool us, then it's supernatural.
 
Upvote 0

variant

Happy Cat
Jun 14, 2005
23,790
6,591
✟315,332.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
No I meant that this individual would show up to your house 20 minutes from now, not that he would limit you to 20 minutes lol. Sorry if I didn't make that clear :)

Well then no I don't have enough equipment to record document and measure an attempt at the supernatural.

So no, twenty minuets is probably not enough for me to document Jesus to be Supernatural regardless.

Such as ?
Lots of objective data. The same thing that convinces me of anything.

This sounds like a supernatural Turing Test of sorts. Which brings us back to Clarke's 3rd law. If it can fool us, then it's supernatural.
Completely and consistently convincing is the standard for all evidence, Turing just points out that we should hold to that standard.
 
Upvote 0

Davian

fallible
May 30, 2011
14,100
1,181
West Coast of Canada
✟46,103.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I'm sorry but talquin asked for evidence, the evidence of the supernatural is the inexpressible and the evidence of the natural, a changed life.

Evidence for natural things is not evidence for supernatural things.

The diversity of the faith is inexpressible, the individual examples of it, changed lives. If you cannot see this as evidence, it is better that you stop looking.

If this were true, all the evidence would be pointing towards the same truth. It does not. The countless different religions in the world show this.

Furthermore, to claim that love can make no point about evidence is disingenuous, we are all children of the love of our parents.

Rubbish. People can get pregnant without love. It happens all the time. Children are not evidence of love, they are evidence of sexual intercourse.
 
Upvote 0

TillICollapse

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2013
3,416
278
✟21,582.00
Gender
Male
Marital Status
Single
Good/ thought provoking exploration too. I've enjoyed reading it.
Awesome :) Glad you enjoyed it :)

Yes, especially if they are a rare occurrence. When they start happening left and right they are little harder to ignore however.
Yes ... they would be harder to ignore if they increased in frequency, etc and so forth. Of course the Occam's Razor explanation there is *expectation*. "I'm saw two eagles the other day, now I'm seeing eagles everywhere !" ... attributed to a person being alert and expecting to see them, etc and so forth. There may be something to them, there may not be.

Eventually it would beg the question ... *if* there is something to synchronicities and the like, how would one distinguish between a purposeful "sign", etc, from a coincidence ?

IMO, at a bare minimum, if one were to have a point of reference that had essentially been verified as having a "supernatural" element to it (although I'm not a fan of the term, obviously lol) to a compare events to, then that point of reference would give them a touchstone of sorts. With that point of reference, events wouldn't need to be extraordinary for such a person to recognize that element. They could conclude it's presence based on their method of detection.

More on this idea in a sec :) ...

The highlighted portion makes an important point imo. When one has a dream that merely appears to predict a single event it's rather easy to chalk it up to chance. When one has a dream that predicts multiple events in a very literal fashion it again becomes harder to ignore. I would talk about some of my dreams here specifically (as examples) but I think my priest / spiritual father would smack me if I did . I've always been told not to do things like that especially in public or online.
Aww ... I would have liked to hear some of them. I'm a fan of direct experience.

I'm in strong agreement with the first bolded statement above. The later bolded statement could be accurate as well imo. What reason would we have to call it "supernatural"? I'm not sure. It may simply be a natural human faculty that just isn't as well known as some of the others that we posses.
Indeed, a possibility.

No doubt. I've never seen a limb regrowing type thing before.
I haven't seen this yet either, although I have seen incredible things which are somewhat comparable. I've seen the weather commanded with a person speaking words before, instantly respond to the words, like a faucet turning off and on. I've seen translocation (a person in one place one moment, then in a completely different place the next). Etc etc.

That's possible. One could say that all we experience directly in relation to "outside" phenomena** is our own mind (nervous system etc..) or our own phaneron. Even "external" things could be chalked up to "it's just my mind playing tricks on me " too if one wanted to be very skeptical. I've certainly had audio, visual, tactile, even olfactory experiences in certain altered states that I assume were "not really there" in a physical sense at least. Some people use that fact to simply reject anything out of the ordinary that happens to people if it doesn't leave a lasting observable effect. "You [or 'you people'], must have been hallucinating!" But, yes, the more dramatic outer experiences like something that appears to be a physical levitation, people glowing and emitting warmth, etc... would be more fantastic and might be harder to deny then say a common run of the mill prophetic dream.
Here's an example that has various elements of the above ... hopefully you'll find this convo enjoyable as well :)

I'll try and keep this as short as possible for brevity, while still including some interesting details.

Back around 2000, my wife and I started exploring Christianity as a whole very seriously. Prior to that, I had my own experiences and focusses in life, but I was not religious in any sense, I did not have it shoved down my throat growing up, and so I was still very much unfamiliar with much of the different facets and denominations, branches, etc of Christianity. At the time, I had a best friend from high school who had surprised everyone by converting to Eastern Orthodoxy (at first it was Greek and then later he would go to Russian). It was out of the blue, and shocking to us all, because it was opposite from his personality and upbringing (essentially an agnostic upbringing). Anyways, when my wife (at the time) and I started to explore Christianity, we started with Eastern Orthodoxy. My friend gave a good argument for how the religion traced it's roots back to the Apostles directly, succession, etc and so forth. We wanted to "do it right", and we actually visited a monastery on an island near where we lived (Washington State). I began to read literature, etc and so forth, we talked about what it would take to become Orthodox, etc.

Anyways, one thing lead to another, and we ended up going in a completely different direction. To keep a very long story short (I mean, the story itself is fascinating I think … even speaking to the synchronicities concept and whatnot ….) we found ourselves involved with an interdenominational missionary organization group prayer meeting one day, that was wildly different from the Orthodoxy we were just learning. This was Pentecostal and Charismatic in nature. It was the first time I had been exposed to such a thing … the "babbling" praying in tongues, singing songs, throwing hands up in the air, praying so many things in the "Lord, we just come before you and ask __________" manner. Very emotional, lots of hype.

I was offended actually … it went against everything I was learning, every direction I was heading. I actually remember being angry at their behavior, upset … fists clinched. I was uncomfortable, everything seemed ridiculous to me. I felt out of place. BUT, I wanted to understand Christianity, find the branch that "had it right", etc. I was convinced within the first few minutes of being in that prayer meeting, that the people I was looking at were NOT the ones who "had it right".

That's when one of the people in the prayer meeting stopped doing the "tongues babble" talk, and looked at me (there was only about ten people in it, maybe less), and said to me, "I believe God wants you to ask Him something. Almost like He's daring you to ask Him something.

My first thought was, "I can't take anymore of this nonsense. What gives her the right to single me out ? How manipulative …"

BUT … something started to happen to me. I'll try and be detailed, because it brings me back to something I was saying up above and somewhat the thread in general …

I started to experience what seemed like a strong wind, warm, begin to blow around me and enter me. Like, if you could imagine a wind blowing on the outside of you, but then "enter" into you and begin to fill you up on the inside, this is what it felt like. I felt myself get hot and warm, and I couldn't stop it … I could feel my face getting flush, cheeks and ears red I was sure of it … and I don't know why, but I began to cry. Not sad or happy tears, more like, overwhelming. I felt suddenly overwhelmed, like I didn't know what was physically happening to me, and tears started to flow.

As this wind was happening, and I kept feeling warmer and warmer and filled by it, I began to feel also like something were on fire within me. As though something were being burned away, almost cauterized. It wasn't painful. It wasn't enjoyable, but it wasn't painful. As this burning effect continued, I began to experience a clarity as well. Not the type of clarity when you're "in the zone", focussed on something and able to focus on the task at hand with clarity, not like that … more like what people probably try to describe when they describe "enlightenment". I'm not saying I experienced enlightenment, only that the clarity seemed akin to it.

This wasn't a process I could stop. Whatever was happening to me, wasn't in my control. It was happening TO me.

Within that clarity, I began to "hear" something. Yes this story involves "voices", but hopefully it's still enjoyable and interesting to read :)

I began to hear a voice … not with my ears, and not in my mind, but in a place that is like, in between. I could still think to myself the entire time, in fact, I kept trying to reason in my mind what was happening. The voice said, "Go ahead, ask .. I dare you, ask me something."

It kept repeating it over and over … it wasn't my voice, not my internal voice, I didn't recognize the voice. But it sounded friendly. I know it sounds ridiculous, but it sounded friendly.

Like I said, I could still reason in my own mind, and I honestly began to think to myself and ask myself, "Am I imagining this ? Am I hallucinating ? Is this what a hallucination is like ? That can't possibly be a real voice, am I being influenced by these people somehow ?"

But the voice kept repeating, saying the same thing … "Go ahead, ask !" almost like a friend would talk to me.

I began to look around me, to see if anyone else was looking at me and seeing what I was going through … I was crying, I was sure my face was red and flush, and I didn't really expect others to hear the voice too … but at the same time, like I said it wasn't in my head. So I wondered if others could hear it. No one was really paying attention to me, they just left me alone, sitting there, they continued with their prayers and whatnot.

This went on for a couple of minutes … and I decided to "play along". I mean, it wasn't stopping, I was either hallucinating or I wasn't, so I may as well talk back, either it was a real or it wasn't.

So I sort of calmed my own mind down, and thought, "Okay … if this is God I'm hearing, and I can ask something, I would like proof you are real. Part the ocean I'm looking at right now." (where I was sitting, I could see the ocean at that time).

I mean, go big or go home … why not cut to the chase ? It's the question everyone wants answered, and they want to see dramatic proof of it. So parting the ocean would have been dramatic enough to me.

The voice responded, "Don't ask something that proves whether I'm real or not."

At that, I was CERTAIN I was making it all up. I was imagining it. It was bogus. I thought to myself, "I'm not going to waste another minute on this," … but the voice came back, "Ask something else. Go ahead, ask something else."

I gave it another minute or so … the experience wasn't ending, still with the wind, the warmth, the "fire", the clarity, the voice … I was thinking that if it was in fact bogus, my own ability to reason through it would eventually cause it to stop and get me out from the influence of whatever was happening to me. But it didn't, so after about a minute, I asked, "Okay if this is God, then my wife and I need money. We are running out," … kind of sad I would go there, but we were running out, and were afraid we would end up homeless.

The voice responded back with an impression, I had the impression I didn't need to ask for that, that it was already known and would always be taken care of.

At that, I thought it was even more bogus. I was told I could ask anything, yet my first question was denied. My second question was unnecessary. And everything I was now engaging in went against my own concepts and expectations of who "God" was. I mean, I was considering Orthodoxy, not this nonsense that seemed more like a genie.

Yet the experience wasn't ending, the voice was still saying, "Ask again, come on …" and so I thought to myself, "Okay. I'll try this one more time. It's not ending, I don't think I'm crazy just yet, so let me think. If I were to ask something "Christian"esque, I would ask something for someone else. Not myself. I would ask something for another."

So I thought about it.

There was a man (we'll say his name is Mark) that the group was praying for, a man who was dying from a disease (I'll try and keep some things private here). They were praying for him to be healed. I had no idea who this man was, I hadn't met him … he was a friend of theirs, to me I only knew him by his name because of them. So I thought to myself, "I wonder if it's okay to ask for Mark to be healed." So I asked the voice, "Can I pray for Mark to be healed of his disease ?" and the voice said, "Yes you may pray for that …"

And that's when I had a vision … it was the first time I had anything like that happen. It was something I could see in the same place I was "hearing" this voice. It wasn't with my natural eyes, so it wasn't taking place in front of me … and it wasn't in my mind's eye, where I would normally visualize things. It was "in-between" is how I would describe it. Anyways, I actually felt the voice "leave", as though it had a presence that left when it left … and this vision came into focus.

I saw a room … very detailed. There was a man in a bed, laying down, and I was there at the foot of the bed praying over him. I remember everything in the room … position of the dressers, chairs, color of the bed spread and sheets. There was a sliding glass door that had long pink curtains going down to the floor, and the sun was setting in a specific way through the window to one side where the curtains were parted. There was a specific pattern on the bed sheets, everything. And along with me in the vision, were two other people … a girl I knew only by face (I had seen her walking around with this group I was currently in the prayer meeting with), she was there like a ghost, and then disappeared. There was one other person, another member of the group. He was there more solid, less "ghost like", but he wasn't there fully. It was hard to describe.

I saw that vision, made note of every single element, and then it ended … the vision faded, the wind feeling stopped, I stopped feeling hot, the clarity left me for the most part, no more voice, no vision, I stopped crying, I "returned to normal" as it were.

cont ...
 
Upvote 0

TillICollapse

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2013
3,416
278
✟21,582.00
Gender
Male
Marital Status
Single
cont ...

I had no idea what had happened to me, and after it ended I still wasn't sure whether it was bogus or not … and when I went to find my wife (she actually wasn't there), I told her EVERYTHING. I wrote it down, every detail, etc. And I remember saying to her, "I don't know what happened, but I think I may have been filled with the Holy Spirit." and I have no idea where I got that phrase from. I had never heard that phrase used to my knowledge (although I may have and made note of it subconsciously), and I was unaware of what the "Holy Spirit" even was (I had only read a very small part of the Bible at that point, nothing concerning the Holy Spirit had stuck). Again, the Penteostal/Charismatic type stuff was new to me, foreign, I didn't even know what to call things that people were doing yet. It was like a foreign language to me. Yet I used that phrase with her, "I was filled with the Holy Spirit". It came out of my mouth, almost as though the words were put there.

I was determined at first to verify whether or not the entire experience was real, or bogus. And to me, there was only one way to do that. If the vision involved those people, and was actually a vision of me praying over this Mark person to be healed of his disease … there was only one way to find out if it was real: go find this Mark, go to house, and see for myself. Did I have a vision of this man's room in his house ? Even to the part of the sun being in the window in a specific way ? Or was it nonsense ?

So I wrote it all down, told a few people to get their input and opinion … and found out some disappointing news. Mark lived about 1500 miles away, and there was no way I was going to be able to go see him. I didn't have the funds to even consider getting there, even if I spent every dime I had.

Upon finding that out, I thought, "This is looking like wishful thinking now. It is perhaps bogus."

To try and wrap up this story … I told the two people who were also in the vision the details about it, etc. The girl … she would actually end up being kicked out of the missionary organization within like a week or so (her behavior). She disappeared, I never saw her again. She thought my vision seemed ridiculous (that was the impression I got) and she also said, "Why me ? I'm not special," etc and wanted to be left alone. The guy … after I told him the vision, he actually told me the reason he had joined that missionary organization in the first place:

He was working in his father's fields one night (they owned land in the area, he was very farmer/blue collar type of individual) when a storm came out of nowhere and it was raining hard. The storm actually made him nervous. I can't remember if he said he was hit directly by lightening, or if it struck near him … but something to do with the lightening, and that he heard a voice tell him in the storm, "You are going to be a healer" and when he looked at his hands, they were glowing green. He couldn't hardly believe what had happened to him, but after it happened, he went to the missionary organization which was in town in order to understand it, and he believed he should join it right away, because he believed he was "called to a healer" as of that night. He actually thought there was something to my own experience and vision, but interestingly, he wasn't like, "Yes yes ! I will be the guy who heals Mark of his disease ! That's why I'm in the vision !" I mean, I made that connection almost immediately, he didn't and never seemed to. So I was surprised at his own reaction.

Anyways … a couple of months went by, and I all but lost that initial interest in seeing if the vision was real or not, the experience was real or not. I got caught up in other things, other focusses, etc. However the day came, after a serious of events and random strangers coming seemingly out of the woodwork to hand me and my wife money (it was against my nature to take things like that from people, but these people were saying, "God wants us to give this to you," etc and so forth … so I was taking it at face value much of the time), or us finding money in odd ways … we actually had enough to fly out to where Mark was supposed to live, and I could see if the vision was real. By this time, though, I didn't even know if he was still alive. I had never contacted him or his family, none of it. He was still a stranger to me.

So I asked around, found out he was still alive but not doing that well, got his home number. I mean, it sounded crazy to me, what I was thinking and attempting to do … talk to a complete stranger, to see if I could come pray over them based on a vision ? If I was wrong, I was being selfish and trivializing a person's suffering to explore my own experiences ? Yet, I wasted to know for sure. I didn't want to live with a regret, "What if I had only went and done it, what if I had gone and seen for myself …"

So I got up the courage to call this complete stranger … ended up talking to his wife. I didn't tell her all the crazy details, I mainly told her that I knew friends of theirs who were always praying for her husband, and I wanted to come pray over him too. She agreed it was okay, and I even told her I would have to fly in … she was fine with it, etc.

My wife was adventurous like me, but at the same time, wasn't sure she wanted to spend all our resources on me finding out whether or not I had "heard God" or not. But she ended up supporting me, and we bought tickets … we talked to his wife one day, bought tickets the next day, flew out the next day. It was bam bam bam in timing.

Our flight to arrive was delayed by a couple of hours, pushing our arrival time into the evening. Once we got to the airport, we would have to rent a car and drive a couple of hours out to get to him. The delay of the flight, and our late arrival time greatly disheartened me. Because in my original vision (which I had wrote down, told others the details of months earlier, etc) … the position of the setting sun in one of the sliding glass door window panes was specific. And now, I wasn't even sure we would get there with any daylight at all. It would most suredly be nighttime. Plus, it was overcast. It wasn't clear. I couldn't see the sun even while it was still day. So I was certain my vision wasn't going to be verified.

Plus, I was nervous, full of fear, I felt awkward, stupid. I was an adventurous person, but still, I didn't want to treat people's lives and expectations like they were a game. Plus, I was hoping I hadn't just simply been manipulated somehow into thinking I had an experience when it was all in my imagination. I was willing to admit it if it were the case, however, I didn't want to do so at the expense of letting down a stranger's family, my own wife, using all our resources like that, etc. So I had a huge combination of feelings going on. Plus, I had not heard "God" since then again. No wind, no fire, no clarity. Some synchronicity types of things … but none of those original experiences.

We finally got there. The sky was overcast still, but there was still probably 20 mintues of so left of the sun in the sky. Didn't matter though, it was pretty dim out. We pulled up, my heart pounding in my chest, I was shaking a bit … went up to the door, the wife came, we introduced ourselves.

We went in, made some small talk. Mark was asleep in another room, but she said I could still go in there, it was okay, I probably wouldn't wake him.

So I got done with the small talk, told her I wanted to go pray over him now … and she pointed me to the room. I went over to the room, around the corner … the door was closed, so I opened it …

I know I'm building up this story, but it's how I experienced it :)

As I opened that door, it was like opening the door to another dimension. It's hard to explain how I was feeling … there in front of me, was every single thing in it's exact place, with every detail exactly as I had seen it. Every position of every piece of furniture, color of things, bed spread, patterns, everything.

And there were the sliding glass doors, with the long pink curtains … and there in the corner, just as I had seen, was the setting sun. The clouds hard parted in such a way, that I could see the full sun there at the last 10 minutes or so of the sunset suddenly. It was beautiful, lighting up the pink curtains exactly as I had seen them.

I mean … it was literally like stepping into another room, that belonged to another dimension or time. And this was all going through my head: what I had seen months earlier, was now here in front of me. A person I didn't know, a room I couldn't have known anything about, even down to the position of the setting sun in the glass, and the way it illuminated the curtains. And my plane had been late, by HOURS, not just minutes. I almost didn't even decided to come. It was last minute, and even then it was after complete strangers had given us random money … something that was against my nature to accept from people. I had no strong feelings anymore, no "voices" since. Yet here I was, experiencing something I had seen in detail, down to the very moment and time of day. I had seen in advance a place I was going to be not just geographically, but in time. And it was surreal. And I had written it all down, so that someone couldn't say, "You made it all up after the fact." I also realized, especially because I had experienced all of that in the context of "hearing a voice I thought was God" … that I was going to become one of those people, who when I told the story, there were going to be people who simply wouldn't believe me. They'd think I was making it up, or delusional, or any number of things. I was now going to be one of "those people". I actually realized that there in that room lol. If I hadn't heard a voice, it may have been easier to swallow. But the voice thing … was going to be a kicker. But it's what happened.

And while I was standing there, I began to experience the warmth again. Not the wind, but the "fire" warmth. And I had clarity again for about 10 seconds, and I heard the voice again … I'm not going to say what it said though lol. I'll save that. But I heard it, and then I kneeled down and said a simple prayer. I mean, like ten words. Simple as that.

I left that room, beside myself. Not sure if I was dreaming or in reality. I told them I needed to go outside … I watched the remainder of the setting sun.

Now I'll cut the story off, I've taken up enough typing time. What I want to point out, is that everything I described had natural effects: my body experienced a physical effect to the initial experience. The vision was detailed, exact. It had different elements. Arguably the people in it were symbolic, but the room itself and moment of time was exact. Precise. The voice … I could distinguish my own thoughts and audible sounds from it, along with the vision. And when things came to pass, reality itself reflected the vision. It seemingly verified it.

I've often wondered, if someone had been performing various types of medical scans on me during that experience, if it were possible, what would such things show ? Activity in which parts of my body, and of what nature ? I mean, blood pressure and pulse, etc … those wouldn't tell much. But a PET scan perhaps ? Before and after if possible ? I was experiencing something that I was arguably having a physical reaction to. And reality itself would later reflect the vision as well. Thus, even if it is "God" … it's in the natural. Natural effects. Responses by the human body. The environment reflecting what is seen "supernaturally". Which is why I'm not a fan of the term "supernatural". It's happening in the natural, and if it is legitimate … just because it's not easily understood doesn't mean it's "defying physics". It's just … not understood yet, the mechanism. But it's effects can be observed, seen, perhaps measured. Something that is in "the mind" only … more difficult. But when a person has a physical response, and their body has a physical response, etc … it's natural, and I don't see why it can't be measured. You just need to be able to know what to look for while a person is experiencing it.

Finally, this goes back to something I mentioned above … let's take my own experience as an example: if a person has this happen to them once, it's one thing. Something hard to explain could still be assumed with Occam's Razor logic. If it happens many times, however, then perhaps it's something more. And it also gives a point of reference, if every time something like that happens … and is almost exactly the same each time … if each time it is verified somehow. Then you have a touchstone which to measure other experiences by, even the more mundane and less extraordinary. For example … the wind, rise in body temperature, etc. If you experience that a dozen times, and each time something incredible happens which is verified … there ***may be something to that "wind", the body's response, etc***. Thus, if it continues to happen but only mundane things are the result … it could still be used as a reference point to identify an origin, a "cause", even without an extraordinary result.

Okay I've typed enough, I'm tired lol :) Hopefully that was enjoyable as well ? If not, I won't take offense :) I also got distracted typing at the end and haven't proof read, so hopefully I wasn't pumping out word salad ...
 
Upvote 0

TillICollapse

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2013
3,416
278
✟21,582.00
Gender
Male
Marital Status
Single
Well then no I don't have enough equipment to record document and measure an attempt at the supernatural.

So no, twenty minuets is probably not enough for me to document Jesus to be Supernatural regardless.

Lots of objective data. The same thing that convinces me of anything.

I think I'm still in disagreement with some of your statements ... I don't see how things that happen in the natural can not be subject to the laws of physics, and thus be literally "supernatural", when they are being observed and experienced and are happening in our universe. I still don't see how it's possible to prove something in our universe is not subject to the physics within it, even if we simply do not understand the principles at work. So I think we're at an impasse at this point in the side convo, as I'll just be asking you to "prove" things. Thanks for responding and being cool about things :)

Completely and consistently convincing is the standard for all evidence, Turing just points out that we should hold to that standard.
Hmm, I'd have to think about that.
 
Upvote 0