Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The answer really depends on what we mean by God's plan. If that means God has planned everything out in my life then yeah I suppose there would be no free will. I don't see that as the case though as omniscience, specifically foreknowledge, does not entail direct causation and so the future God has foreseen is what we have chosen to do.
If God does not force human behavior as a result of knowing it we act of our own will and how we choose to act, hence free will. In that sense free will is balanced with omniscience (foreknowledge).
I think we are using the word plan differently. If I say God has a plan for me I mean that God knows what it is best for me to do. I don't mean that God caused me to be born. God is omniscient and so knows I would be born. So I agree that God didn't plan me to exist and then hope it worked out.
I would say, Chris, that you're attempting to define God with human limitations. There are many things about God that we are incapable of understanding, at least in our present state. For instance, we believe that God created the universe out of nothing. We can't understand it, but that doesn't make it untrue.
well I guess it's just beyond my understanding.
This is pretty simple and is discussed in detail at http://www.christianforums.com/t7573883/http://www.christianforums.com/t7573883/
If God is fully omniscient, then he knows on day 1 what your A/B choice will be on day 3. However, if you have not yet made your day 3 free A/B choice as of day 1, then you could still potentially choose A or B. So let's say God knows on day 1 that you will choose A on day 3. You then choose B per your ability to make a free choice. God's foreknowledge would thus be compromised. Very simple.
I don't guess; I know. I pray that the Lord reveals Himself to you, brother
Not a god, but the one and only God. I thought this forum was for believers.
Freewill can and does exist with the omniscience of God because we on our end experience Free Will. God on his end knows everything we do, and knows what we will do, before we do it...because he is God.
Humans cannot understand the mind of God because it is God who created your mind. We didn't create His. He knows the world and each of us future, past and present. But we can only see through the mirror darkly...we do not have access to all knowledge and understanding yet, and we cannot comprehend the greatness that is God. So while God knows us intimately inside and out, and has a plan that includes each of our decisions in it, and we cannot surprise him...at the same time, we are completely blind and must still weigh our choices carefully...and we do have the freedom to choose. God just already knows what choices we have made. He didn't make us make them, he lets us make them. But he knows what choices we make, and that's all a part of the whole ball of wax.
People who spend much time trying to figure out God and who doubt Him because they cannot fathom him are generally too arrogant to experience salvation. They are trapped in the belief that if it is beyond their understanding, it can't be.
Aside from your rambling example, I think the jest of what you may be trying to convey is that free will means the ability to change the future or the ability to do other than how we originally have done? Is that correct? If so I don't believe this 'loose' freedom exists at any rate.So you cant have this sort-of loose freedom of choice if there is any sort of plan involving you, because you wouldnt even exist were it not for a pretty much infinite number of decisions going just right up until the day you were born. Free will cannot co-exist with omniscience.
Again, if that were the case you cannot have free will in your decisions. see my post above. You cant have it both ways unless you just dont want to really think about.
Aside from your rambling example, I think the jest of what you may be trying to convey is that free will means the ability to change the future or the ability to do other than how we originally have done? Is that correct? If so I don't believe this 'loose' freedom exists at any rate.
All the factors that lead to my birth were going to happen no matter what.
My parents relationship came about because they wanted it to come about. It was of their own will that it did. Again, God's foreknowledge does not conflict with this sort of freedom as it does not coerce my parents into acting, and thus they act out of their own will as to how God foresaw they would act. This freedom is known as compatibilism and differentiates from the 'loose' freedom you described.
Your argument is short coming however as the 'loose' freedom is not even logically supported, otherwise meaning you have to connect the ability to do otherwise (known as PAP in the free will/determinism debate) to the concept of free will to indeed show that free will actually means what you're saying it means.
I don't think your post above deals with what I said at all. I agree that any number of tiny choices would resulted in me not being born. No where in the post does it explain why omniscience and free will can't co-exist.
It does explain why things wont always go exactly how God wants them to go if there is free will. I agree that that though.
If I say God has a plan I don't mean that things happen according to that plan. For example, I might plan on how to win a football match, but due to free will other people don't follow my plan and so lose the match. I still had a plan, its just that no one wanted to follow it.
You will get different answers to this from different Christians, depending upon what their views are regarding predestination.
Personally, I would say that our wills are only relatively free; in the sense that we are not conscious of them being constrained in any way, and being able to act in accordance of our inclinations.
But of course our wills ARE constrained, even on the assumption that there is no God. They are constrained by the circumstances we find ourselves in. If they were not so constrained our actions would be merely arbitrary, and not particularly deserving of the label "rational". But if our actions are not unconstrained by circumstances, still less are they unconstrained by the will of the God who preordained those circumstances and who also created us with our particular temperament and personality.
As the originator of both our personalities and our particular circumstances, an omniscient God can easily predict how we will behave at every moment of our lives; thereby ensuring that his will is done, and his plans are fulfilled.
And thus no free will, again if this is what you believe. If he knows what decision you will make at any branch point, then such a decision has already been pre-ordained and thus any "free will" you have to make such a decision is just an illusion.
Whether or not there is free will depends upon how you define free will, and it is not at all an easy thing to define.
Then obviously you have not heard many people's take on free will. The argument from fatalism that is the argument you are basically presenting defines free will in that sense. That view of free will is known as libertarianism and is even held by some evangelical Christians. I'm not saying that's what free will means I'm saying usually according to the argument presented that's how the advocate defines free will.That's not what "free will" means by anyone's definition that I've ever heard. Free will meaning ability to do other than what we have already done? I dont know where to begin with refuting that. Free will means the freedom to make your own choices.
I don't see how free will isn't involved as I've described to how I believe...And therefore no free will involved. Or at least, not according to what you apparently believe.
I'm not contradicting myself. First, if God has foresaw the future what He has foreseen has not actually happened yet, so a decision has not actually been made in reality but as been perceived of by God that it will be made. Moreover, the desicion God has foresaw is the free will decision that my parents, not anyone else, will make. The 'prediction' doesn't make the future happen it is simply that: a prediction of what will happen.No, actually what you are doing is contradicting yourself. You're saying they were free to make their own decisions but the god you believe in foresaw what decision they would make. Again, if someone can make either of two (or many choices) then no being can predict what decision will be made. If such a being can predict what decision will be made, then such a decision has already been decided and thus no free will.
So no, there is no logical contradiction just a misunderstanding on your behalf. No fallacy as you have not even began to show one. Free will as defined in the above post is consistent with omniscience as again it is my parents that made the choice that arouse from their own minds and doing and God's knowledge did not conflict with that choice or acting. My parents acted how they wanted to and thus of their own will.You see, just repeating a logical contradiction enough times doesnt eventually make it true. You might eventually train your brain not to ask the question anymore, and thus convince yourself it makes sense. But it still represents a logical fallacy.
Maybe, but what you say free will means is pretty dry. I have not come up with any new definitions but have asked you if your definition of free will was the one of libertarianism, of which I did not come up with. So if you think this is some battle and you are winning, I would tend to think you are the one training your brain to think so.Free will absolutely means what I say it does. You are the one coming up with new definitions for the concept about changing what we have already done. You're fighting a losing battle.
It's actually very easy to define. Nothing ambiguous about the term at all.
"Free" means not controlled by the obligation or the will of another. "Will" in this context means volition, the power of choosing or deciding. Put them together and you have free will, meaning voluntary choice or decision. It's not a nebulous term in the least bit.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?