- Jan 16, 2019
- 22,274
- 18,871
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
And conversely many of the problems we don’t have are also the result of the involvement of scientists.
Scientific intervention in areas outside of food isn't the focus. Nor is it necessary to debate the merits of their usefulness in areas beyond the subject. We're aware of the problems with commercial farming and the solutions the majority prefer. But it isn't the priority of large producers nor will smaller farms become the norm.
They know how to grow food sustainably and practice crop rotation and increase the yields without harmful chemicals. It's part of the curriculum in agriculture school and the knowledge isn't difficult to come by. Money isn't the whole of the problem but its significant enough for them to do otherwise.
They're not going to lower the price to give consumers a better product. You'll never get organic food at conventional prices. The majority can't afford it and there's no incentive to change that. They can offer the masses the norm and sell specialty items for those who desire them. That's how the market works and you'll find the same replicated in other industries.
American products are banned in other countries for a reason or the ingredients are altered to satisfy their requirements. They're not incapable of doing better. But if the government doesn't require it why bother.
Such are the realities of living in a capitalistic society. You can't expect them to do the right thing or be altruistic when they've demonstrated otherwise. Making provisions for yourself and your household is the practical response.
~bella
Upvote
0