Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It is not "my" definition.
That's just what evolution amounts to. Change over generations."-
if this is your definition of evolution then also even if all creatures on earth was created by an intelligent designer evolution is still true. because according to this criteria any change is evolution.
so even if all creatures doesnt shared a commondescnet evolution is still true. so its a problemtaic definition.
but whale also doesnt have claspers, that are very similar to a vestigial legs:
combine it with this fact and we can say that sharks evolve from a land creature:
Sharks Have Genes for Fingers and Toes
again: it was about changes in general. heritable or not.
if small steps can evolve into a big step, we can conclude that even a regular car can change into something new, because we can see that the car is changing over time. same logic- same (wrong) conclusion.
so again: even if human was created by an intelligent designer and stay as human since then- evolution is still true. because he does get changes over generations (like changing skin color).
no it isnt. the ornithumimus have traits (like proto-wings) that more modern species ( like therizinosaurus) doesnt have.
but there is more problems:
Dinosaur Find Raises Questions about the Origin of Feathers
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v511/n7507/full/nature13467.html#affil-auth
"This indicates that the origin of flight in avialans was more complex than previously thought and might have involved several convergent achievements of aerial abilities."
as i said before- evolution doesnt predict nested hierarchy.
so if they was able to reproduce you will conclude that those cars evolved by a natural process?
2) he claimed that there is no difference between "evolving" and "changing". so it doesnt matter if car reproduce or not in this case. because even a regular cars changing over time.
so a regular car is changing over time: its color changing because of the sun, wheels get air loss and so on. does it mean that the car evolving?
so again: even if human was created by an intelligent designer and stay as human since then- evolution is still true. because he does get changes over generations (like changing skin color).
Sure, but the car analogy doesn't apply - as has been brought to your attention by pretty much everyone here already. Evolution is the change in allele frequencies in populations over timechange in a population always begin with a change in an individual. even so it doesnt matter because the claim was about any changes in general.
But the car is still the same car and it hasn't reproduced. I guess you could call it evolution of form (as in a change as per a layman's definition) but it certainly doesn't fall under the biological definition of the Theory of Evolution. The Theory of Evolution only applies to living things.again: it was about changes in general. heritable or not. if small steps can evolve into a big step, we can conclude that even a regular car can change into something new, because we can see that the car is changing over time. same logic- same (wrong) conclusion.
Sure, as long as heritable traits are being passed on, that's evolution. We know that we share common ancestors with pretty much all other life on this planet though, so an ID creating independent kinds from a single breeding pair has already been falsified...so again: even if human was created by an intelligent designer and stay as human since then- evolution is still true. because he does get changes over generations (like changing skin color).
Do these vestigial legs in sharks have a femur, tibia, fibula, tarsals, metatarsals, and phalanges? If not, they are not homologous.
lets focus in one claim each time.
so do you think that small steps will not evolve into a big step in this car?
Sure, but it still isn't evolution because your car doesn't have baby cars, therefore these traits can't be passed on.so do you think that small steps will not evolve into a big step in this car?
sure? so the car can change into an airplane for instance?
Let's do.
Do these vestigial legs in sharks have a femur, tibia, fibula, tarsals, metatarsals, and phalanges?
.
do whales have those legs-like structures?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?