- Feb 4, 2006
- 46,773
- 10,977
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
However, arguing that rarity should govern response is ridiculous. Actions taken to address preventable deaths are not often based on rarity. A child drowning in a pool is not common, but there are still laws in place to mitigate the common causes of children drowning (like requiring fences at a certain height). Will this stop all drownings? No. But it lessens drownings. Just like texting laws will not stop all distracted drivers, but it does lessen the number of accident. I often wonder what it's like to live in a world where you see something wrong, but don't wish to take any steps to improve it, I guess that's why I science research.
Huh?
Upvote
0