• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Homosexuality from a christian point of veiw.

What do you think of homosexuality?

  • it is wrong, immoral and un-ethical i shall try to convert peolple.

  • i disagree with it but as long as it dosent interfere with me...

  • im indifferent/ undecided

  • its ok with me whatever you wanna do God loves you

  • im gay and proud

  • other... (please specify in the forum if your opinion dosent generall fall under these options)


Results are only viewable after voting.

outlaw

the frugal revolutionary
Aug 22, 2005
2,814
268
49
✟4,376.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
I see so many here twisting and turning scripture in order to justify their own personal prejudice and justify discrimination against gays and lesbians.
 
Upvote 0

Kgreg

Well-Known Member
Nov 1, 2005
1,135
87
55
New York NY
✟1,773.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
outlaw said:
I see so many here twisting and turning scripture in order to justify their own personal prejudice and justify discrimination against gays and lesbians.

Homosexual sex is outside of God's will for His people, as is all sex outside of marriage, and He's only provided for marriage between a man and a woman. I'm know that this can be rough to hear, but it's the truth. Living within God's will is much more rewarding than pleasure of hot gay sex.
 
Upvote 0

sethad

I'm not [senDing sublimInal messagEs!]
Jun 15, 2005
45,416
154
38
Visit site
✟69,022.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single

what about hot heterosexual sex? is God against that too?
 
Upvote 0

outlaw

the frugal revolutionary
Aug 22, 2005
2,814
268
49
✟4,376.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Kgreg said:
Homosexual sex is outside of God's will for His people, as is all sex outside of marriage, and He's only provided for marriage between a man and a woman.
Levirate marriage is within God’s will

The name of this type of marriage is derived from the Latin word "levir," which means "brother-in-law." This involved a woman who was widowed without having borne a son. She would be required to leave her home, marry her brother-in-law, live with him, and engage in sexual relations. The woman would have to endure what was essentially serial rapes with her former brother-in-law as perpetrator. Their first-born son was considered to be sired by the deceased husband. In Genesis 38:6-10, Tamar's husband Er was killed by God for unspecified sinful behavior. Er's brother, Onan, was then required by custom to marry Tamar. Not wanting to have a child who would not be consider his, he engaged in an elementary (and quite unreliable) method of birth control: coitis interruptus. God appears to have given a very high priority to the levirate marriage obligation. Being very displeased with Onan's behavior, God killed him as well. Ruth 4 reveals that a man would be required to enter into a levirate marriage not only with his late brother's widow, but with a widow to whom he was the closest living relative.



Gen 21:10 shows that concubines are A-OKAY with God.



Numbers 31:1-18 Deuteronomy 21:11-14 indicate tahth married men can rape female prisoners of war.





Kind of throws a monkey wrench into your exclusion argument.

I'm know that this can be rough to hear, but it's the truth. Living within God's will is much more rewarding than pleasure of hot gay sex.
Personally I think being honest is better than pretending to be something one is not.
 
Upvote 0

ChristianCenturion

Veteran / Tuebor
Feb 9, 2005
14,207
576
In front of a computer
✟40,488.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
outlaw said:
... Dale B. Martin Arsenokoités and Malakos: Meanings and Consequences 1996 Westminster John Knox Press

Writing a book does not make one God.

You make keep the unrecognized gay adovcate, I'll stick to scripture that has been tested and shown true as is.
 
Upvote 0

Kgreg

Well-Known Member
Nov 1, 2005
1,135
87
55
New York NY
✟1,773.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single


Still living according to the OT. Very well then.
 
Upvote 0

spinto

Regular Member
Jun 26, 2003
451
51
43
Texas
✟850.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian


It is not outside God's Will. Outside Christian law maybe.... If God has only provided for marriage between man and woman, than homosexuality would not exsits--my marriage would not exist. And, it does... I don't think God plays games--certainly not with me. I am not his pawn on his chess board. I am his friend and part of the whole that is Divinity. The love that I have to give is pure. And sharing that love with someone whom I TRUELY love is a pure way to rejoice in Divinity. It is real and it is good.

Some closet gay guy with his head stuck in a Bible, praying over himself, hoping for a change, forcing himself to marry a woman, is what I call a sin. It is a sin of a self-obsorbed, self-degrading, sad man. God is very hard to hear above the noise of biblical scripture and self-loathing. It is a sure way to mental and emotional illness... But hey this is only my opinion....

And finally, a loving marriage between two people of the same sex is no more "about sex" than a loving marriage between a man and woman. This whole "gay" equals "just sex" equation is a horribly disrespectful notion.
 
Upvote 0

outlaw

the frugal revolutionary
Aug 22, 2005
2,814
268
49
✟4,376.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
ChristianCenturion said:
Writing a book does not make one God.

You make keep the unrecognized gay adovcate, I'll stick to scripture that has been tested and shown true as is.
Pretending a word means something it does not does not change the meaning of the word.


Stick with what you like, I will stick with honesty and integrity
 
Upvote 0

Scally Cap

GO IRISH!!!
Jun 23, 2004
856
109
58
Baja Arizona
Visit site
✟24,055.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
ChristianCenturion said:
Writing a book does not make one God.

I'll remember that the next time someone cites a commentary or other reference discussing hotly contested translated words. That's about the level of response I expected. It was a good effort, outlaw.

BTW, Happy Birthday there, CC. It's my step-daughter's birthday today too.
 
Upvote 0

ChristianCenturion

Veteran / Tuebor
Feb 9, 2005
14,207
576
In front of a computer
✟40,488.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
outlaw said:
Pretending a word means something it does not does not change the meaning of the word.


Stick with what you like, I will stick with honesty and integrity

MAJOR flaw in those empty claims - EVIDENCE.
Centuries upon century of evidence against the "newly discovered" Gnosticism that is being attempted and somehow, everybody is suppose to turn a blind eye to it. Century upon century of a void backing up the Gnostic claim only coupled with itching ears wanting it to be true.

And yet, they still keep printing the Bibles:

1 Corinthians 6:9-10
9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
~~~

This too is something the gay advocates can't even get past on the BASIC tenets; that EVEN IF a freedom to do something were legitimate, love for the brother in a divisive issue dictates abstaining from such freedom. The advocacy for sexual immorality, while understandable for being driven by the flesh, continues to lose, over and over again.

1 Corinthians 8:13
Therefore, if what I eat causes my brother to fall into sin, I will never eat meat again, so that I will not cause him to fall.
 
Upvote 0

Kgreg

Well-Known Member
Nov 1, 2005
1,135
87
55
New York NY
✟1,773.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Since you quoted me, I will assume all of this is directed my way.


 
Upvote 0

sethad

I'm not [senDing sublimInal messagEs!]
Jun 15, 2005
45,416
154
38
Visit site
✟69,022.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single

note that it says homosexual offenders in that first verse. not homosexuals. so it could mean homosexual offenders as in those guys who used to keep little boys as sex slaves.

as I already said...

if it said heterosexual offenders would everyone think being heterosexual was a sin?
 
Upvote 0

ChristianCenturion

Veteran / Tuebor
Feb 9, 2005
14,207
576
In front of a computer
✟40,488.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
sethad said:
note that it says homosexual offenders in that first verse. not homosexuals. so it could mean homosexual offenders as in those guys who used to keep little boys as sex slaves.
You can speculate all that you wish; however, that is hardly meeting the evidence requirement for this topic and it certainly wouldn't be a qualification to attempt teaching Christian tenets.

Yes, it says offenders. I have not argued that the person who is struggling with temptations of homosexuality is guilty of a sin. While the temptation is wrong and they should rightly flee from it, the fact that they persevere against it is a testimony to God's grace and power. The sin is not given the birth.
as I already said...

if it said heterosexual offenders would everyone think being heterosexual was a sin?

More speculations... you may wish to address ALL the supporting OTHER SCRIPTURE that would prove conflicted with such a change.
 
Upvote 0

sethad

I'm not [senDing sublimInal messagEs!]
Jun 15, 2005
45,416
154
38
Visit site
✟69,022.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
As it is...the verse in Leviticus is out if you think eating shrimp is ok.

the other verses are written by Paul, not Jesus. Jesus never mentioned homosexuality. and there already is speculation about the word that Paul used and that it may have meant sex offenders and pedophiles NOT homosexuals because the word for homosexuals back then was paiderasste, not arsenokoitai. over time people translated the word arsenokoitai to mean homosexual, but that doesnt mean it is what that passage originally meant.

It's kind of like people saying that Allah is the word for God. when in fact, that is what it has become to mean, the real word for god (any generic god) in Arabic is Ilah with the plural being Alihah.

and its kind of like how gay used to mean happy and now it means homosexual.

see how words change?

Have to look back to the time period when it was written to find the actual meaning.
 
Upvote 0

ChristianCenturion

Veteran / Tuebor
Feb 9, 2005
14,207
576
In front of a computer
✟40,488.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
sethad said:
As it is...the verse in Leviticus is out if you think eating shrimp is ok.
Who says that the verse in Leviticus is out? You?
The Jew is still not to eat shrimp.
the other verses are written by Paul, not Jesus. Jesus never mentioned homosexuality.
Saint Paul is infinitely more qualified to say things regarding spiritual matters than any of the gay advocates. And the Christian teaching contains much more than a book with only red letters. Pointing to something else and saying "look over there" isn't helping the argument for homosexuality. Please try to recognize what topic is being discussed.
The word homosexual wasn't used until the 1800's, so your reasoning is flawed along with the fact that the premise of "only one word" exists, for a specific meaning, at any one time is ignorant. How many words do you think I can list (but won't) that mean homosexual.

Besides all the "what ifs", speculation, "it's all about the words", etc., it's a good thing God had wisdom enough to address the act in an easily understandable fashion then, huh?

Lev 18:22 " 'Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.
 
Upvote 0

sethad

I'm not [senDing sublimInal messagEs!]
Jun 15, 2005
45,416
154
38
Visit site
✟69,022.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
so I'm guessing you also follow the other 600 laws ChristianCenturion?

Leviticus says not to lie with men

it also says not to eat shrimp among other things. Total of old covenant laws is over 600. do you follow all of them? you cant pick and choose you know
 
Upvote 0

sethad

I'm not [senDing sublimInal messagEs!]
Jun 15, 2005
45,416
154
38
Visit site
✟69,022.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
the word would mean describing a homosexual act. you'd have to go back and find the word that was used during Paul's time. not what is used now or what it has begun to mean now. that was my point, obviously you didnt get it.

and since the word homosexual wasnt invented until the 1800s I guess we could all say that it would be impossible to have homosexuality be a sin then (using your logic)
 
Upvote 0

ChristianCenturion

Veteran / Tuebor
Feb 9, 2005
14,207
576
In front of a computer
✟40,488.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

Non sequitur has been addressed here. The fact that one can thoroughly answer a question only to have the same question asked and by the same people only goes to show what kind of mindset is advocating for homosexuality and what meaningless tactics they use.

In addition, what is ignorant in that argument is highlighted by the latter part of Leviticus 18. God shows that the sexual immorality law not only was to apply to the Jew, but the Gentile as in those among them and as shown by God Judging those that practiced it elsewhere - later to become the Promised Land.
 
Upvote 0

levi501

Senior Veteran
Apr 19, 2004
3,286
226
✟27,190.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
sethad said:
it also says not to eat shrimp among other things. Total of old covenant laws is over 600. do you follow all of them? you cant pick and choose you know
Uh yah he can...
Philippians 4:13
"I can do everything through him who gives me strength."

That includes picking and choosing which laws to obey.
 
Upvote 0