• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

"homophobia" term

KarateCowboy

Classical liberal
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2004
13,390
2,109
✟140,932.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
GhostDad said:
He can only claim this after the fact. We don't have any other better words to encapsulate the actions and attitudes of anti-equality activists, and "homophobia" works just fine, so it's the one we've decided to use.

Throw us a bone here. We don't believe homosexuality = heterosexuality, but that doesn't mean we think homosexuals are inhuman. So to us it's not a matter of equality but righteousness, if you get what I'm saying. So I'll help you, which will in turn help me: we'd rather be called pro-family, anti-homosexual, or straight-only than homophobic.

I prefer straight-only.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟73,445.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
KarateCowboy said:
Well, i've never met a homosexual I didn't like. However, I don't like certain things they do: homosexual acts.

I know what you mean. I have a friend who puts milk in his coffee instead of cream. How can I get him to stop doing that?

KarateCowboy said:
So to us it's not a matter of equality but righteousness, if you get what I'm saying. So I'll help you, which will in turn help me: we'd rather be called pro-family, anti-homosexual, or straight-only than homophobic.

I prefer straight-only.

So you're anti-homosexual, but you don't dislike homosexuals? That doesn't add up. Its certainly discriminatory, as you claim you prefer straight people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steen
Upvote 0

MoonlessNight

Fides et Ratio
Sep 16, 2003
10,217
3,523
✟63,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
So you're anti-homosexual, but you don't dislike homosexuals? That doesn't add up. Its certainly discriminatory, as you claim you prefer straight people.
I'm anti-alcoholism but I don't have a problem with alcoholics. There is a difference between hating a person and finding fault in their behavior or conditions.

Virtue and vice, man. Virtue and vice.
 
Upvote 0

MoonlessNight

Fides et Ratio
Sep 16, 2003
10,217
3,523
✟63,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
JGG said:
When sexual orientation became vice, virtue, and habit.
A habit is a predisposition towards certain actions. A sexual orientation would seem to fit that.

A virtue is a habit that helps you act in a moral matter. A vice is a habit that helps you act in a sinful matter. If you think sexual acts have moral connotations its not unreasonable to think that sexual orientation could be considered a virtue or vice.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟73,445.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
MoonlessNight said:
A habit is a predisposition towards certain actions. A sexual orientation would seem to fit that.

So heterosexuality is just as bad?

A virtue is a habit that helps you act in a moral matter.

Okay, so let's say I believe that being white helps me act in a moral matter.

A vice is a habit that helps you act in a sinful matter.

And lets say that I think not being white helps others act in a sinful matter.

Have you ever been to a white supremacist website? Whites are supposed to be superior because blacks, asians, Jews are immoral. Asians are supposedly scheming, blacks are violent, Jews are greedy. I obviuosly don't agree with any of this, but you're currently making the same argument the white supremacists make.

If you think sexual acts have moral connotations its not unreasonable to think that sexual orientation could be considered a virtue or vice.

Ditto with skin color.
 
Upvote 0

MoonlessNight

Fides et Ratio
Sep 16, 2003
10,217
3,523
✟63,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Have you ever been to a white supremacist website? Whites are supposed to be superior because blacks, asians, Jews are immoral. Asians are supposedly scheming, blacks are violent, Jews are greedy. I obviuosly don't agree with any of this, but you're currently making the same argument the white supremacists make.

But there's no good evidence for those things. There is however, good evidence that being homosexual makes you predisposed to homosexual action, i.e. homosexual sex for instance. Are you denying that? If you aren't than your comparison of me to a racist falls flat.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟73,445.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
MoonlessNight said:
But there's no good evidence for those things. There is however, good evidence that being homosexual makes you predisposed to homosexual action, i.e. homosexual sex for instance. Are you denying that? If you aren't than your comparison of me to a racist falls flat.

But sex is not immoral.
 
Upvote 0

MoonlessNight

Fides et Ratio
Sep 16, 2003
10,217
3,523
✟63,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
JGG said:
But sex is not immoral.
Not all sex certainly, but I believe that some can be. That is where we disagree. If you want to call me a prude or a puritan or Victorian in my attitudes towards sex or repressed or whatever go ahead because at least then you are hitting the right issues. But trying to make me into a biggot or calling me the same as a white supremicist is completely intellectually dishonest.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟73,445.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Robinsegg said:
JGG,
Your claims make sense only if one believes an homosexual orientation is genetic or present at birth. Not everyone believes that, nor have they found any scientific evidence of such.

Actually, there's more evidence that its due to genetics than there is evidence that its a choice. I'll have to find the thread where I posted my citations.
 
Upvote 0

Robinsegg

SuperMod L's
Site Supporter
Mar 1, 2006
14,765
607
Near the Mississippi
✟108,126.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I never stated it's a choice, though I do believe there are things that can cause it after birth. I can't imagine why someone would "choose" this lifestyle that's so difficult in our culture.

But, neither do I think it's predetermined at or before birth.

Rachel
 
Upvote 0