- Mar 12, 2007
- 4,347
- 537
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Pentecostal
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- AU-Labor
As we record and discuss Christian history, essentially people and what God did through them, how can we justly mention the faulted characters? I mean not just sinners saved by grace, but deeply faulted characters.
Martin Luther, revived some things, not quite what I mean by revival. I refer to the gifts of the Spirit and things like God's fire, oil, living water and the power in Christ's blood... But Luther broke free from authoritarianism and revived the adult salvation experience and studying scripture for yourself. But his words also led to slaughters.
Personally, I dislike St John Chrysostom's Against the Jews.
Pope John Paul the second did some lovely things, but was unpopular because of the pedophile priest issues, although secretly, he may have changed the administration with other priests, since the last cover up, was about, forty years ago?
There is William Branham's ministry.
AA Allen, who made headway in healing the sick, but would drink alcohol, and died by suicide.
And Frank Houston, who saw many salvations and much spiritual gifting, beyond for himself, but services taken over by the congregations' vocal gifts. But he had a fault in that he was attracted to young boys.
And Benny Hinn, who seems to liberally give away the Holy Spirit, but also seems to love money.
Is there some etiquette for recording this history? Should we not write about them, or deny they were or are Christians?
Looking at John Arnott and Randy Clark, John mentions Frank Houston and his faith, and Randy writes about AA Allen loving the healing breakthroughs. And it seems even some Christians hate Frank and his company, Brian, Bobbie, Hillsong... but in Christian circles cannot, actually come out with the word "hate" in simple straight forward expression. Fearing the genuine Christians and their love. Not love some hate some.
I would like to write an account of the history of church in Sydney and also some of what we heard of and gained by visitors from afar.
Martin Luther, revived some things, not quite what I mean by revival. I refer to the gifts of the Spirit and things like God's fire, oil, living water and the power in Christ's blood... But Luther broke free from authoritarianism and revived the adult salvation experience and studying scripture for yourself. But his words also led to slaughters.
Personally, I dislike St John Chrysostom's Against the Jews.
Pope John Paul the second did some lovely things, but was unpopular because of the pedophile priest issues, although secretly, he may have changed the administration with other priests, since the last cover up, was about, forty years ago?
There is William Branham's ministry.
AA Allen, who made headway in healing the sick, but would drink alcohol, and died by suicide.
And Frank Houston, who saw many salvations and much spiritual gifting, beyond for himself, but services taken over by the congregations' vocal gifts. But he had a fault in that he was attracted to young boys.
And Benny Hinn, who seems to liberally give away the Holy Spirit, but also seems to love money.
Is there some etiquette for recording this history? Should we not write about them, or deny they were or are Christians?
Looking at John Arnott and Randy Clark, John mentions Frank Houston and his faith, and Randy writes about AA Allen loving the healing breakthroughs. And it seems even some Christians hate Frank and his company, Brian, Bobbie, Hillsong... but in Christian circles cannot, actually come out with the word "hate" in simple straight forward expression. Fearing the genuine Christians and their love. Not love some hate some.
I would like to write an account of the history of church in Sydney and also some of what we heard of and gained by visitors from afar.