Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
"Roman Catholic" is perfectly acceptable, although it is slang (Catholic is the correct term). Romish and Romanism are clearly meant to put down, and that is not only against CF rules, it is unChristian.You ought know your own Romish sources better, but as stated earlier, they are little read by their own:
You have not been able to demonstrate your standard of what [capital] "C"[atholic], nor "C"[hristian] is yet. Is the "CF rules" your standard in determining?"Roman Catholic" is perfectly acceptable, although it is slang (Catholic is the correct term). Romish and Romanism are clearly meant to put down, and that is not only against CF rules, it is unChristian.
Why? You were not responding in any meaningful way to the evidences, of both scripture and historical, and neither to the direct questions placed before you even before now.I'm placing you on ignore.
I would suspect you will change your mind later, but that is ok, I wouldn't mind.I will no longer see your goading posts, so don't expect any future answers from me.
No, that's your interpretation of the Bible. Big difference.
Yes, I was still awaiting scriptural evidence for the following statements made [even amidst all of the passages quoted]:BobRyan said: ↑
We have an annual celebration of the birth of Christ and an annual celebration of the death and resurrection of Christ. Passover is not on the resurrection of Christ - it is on the death of Christ. All of which He did "once".
But He was not raised to life "weekly" or "on a 7 day cycle" and he was not born "weekly" or on a 7 day cycle -- neither did they crucify Christ weekly - or on a 7 day cycle.
So then - that is the actual Bible on the subject of those events.
Irrefutable.
You are not presenting any fact - just a wish that the details in the statement above were not so clear to all.
You have free will - you can choose to do that. But the readers see the point "anyway" since not one of them will doubt the fact that Christ was not born "weekly" nor did he die "weekly" nor was he raised "weekly" nor was the Passover celebrated "weekly".
I am merely stating the obvious.
Where in scripture is passover the whole week [8 days or 7 days or 1 days, which will they choose]?...Passover may have been a single night when God delivered the Israelites from Pharoah, but its celebration is a week long. It was STILL the feast of unleavened bread (Passover) when Jesus rose. ...
Israel is Jesus, His children are His Discples, and the Holy 7th Day the Sabbath of the LORD thy God, was made for the man [Adam, and thus all in Him from Genesis, Exodus 20:8-11; Hebrews 4:1-13, etc], and Christ Jesus is the Second/Last Adam [and thus all in Him are to keep it with Him, as we love Him who first loved us, John 14:15; Exodus 20:6,8-11]:That "Law" only applied to Israel. And the LORD said, "Speak to the CHILDREN OF ISRAEL..." Not to the Nations. So when the Gentile churches formed, the Church had a right to choose its own day for worship, and they chose the sacred day upon which Christ rose.
They deny who Israel is:
Matthew 2:13-15; Hosea 11:1; 1 Corinthians 15:44-46
They deny who His true children are:
Isaiah 8:8-20; Hebrews 2:10-14
They deny what is in the New Covenant itself:
Isaiah 56:1,8; John 10:16; Isaiah 56:2-7
They deny that the true children of Israel are to keep the 7th Day the Sabbath of the LORD thy God Holy:
Exodus 31:13; Acts 13, 15, 18; Revelation 1:10
They do not obey the Everlasting Gospel:
Revelation 14:6-12; Isaiah 58; Job 29; Luke 4
They turn from the Holy Commandment delivered unto them:
Exodus 20:8-11; 2 Peter 2:21
They seek to change times and laws of the Most High God, and in so doing fill the land with violence:
Daniel 7:25; Ezekiel 8:16
They trample upon the rest of the Son of God:
Genesis 1-2; Exodus 20:8-11; Hebrews 4:1-13;
God the Father, looks even now upon the wounds/scars of His own beloved Son, Jesus Christ, which was there because of the transgression of the Holy Law of God, the Ten Commandments -- do they think by crucifying afresh the son of God, and trampling upon that Law, changing it, removing it, that they shall escape the vengeance/wrath of God?
You have to understand that for Catholics, Easter is something that really starts on Ash Wednesday and doesn't end until Pentecost Sunday. The heart of it is Holy week, which extends from Palm Sunday, through Tridium (Holy Thursday, Good Friday, & Holy Saturday) and Resurrection Sunday. It is much more of a season than a one day event.
Passover may have been a single night when God delivered the Israelites from Pharoah, but its celebration is a week long. It was STILL the feast of unleavened bread (Passover) when Jesus rose.
At any rate, whether you think it is "sensible" or not, the proper association of Easter is to the Passover, not to some pagan festival, as I've shown you by the term Pascha.
And why would you even make that comment, knowing that I'm a Christian? And that the only kind of Christian there is, is a new covenant Christian?
Open Heart said: ↑
Irrelevant. The POINT is that Christians tied the celebration (Holy Week, culminating in resurrection Sunday) with Passover.
No, that's your interpretation of the Bible. Big difference.
How mean of you to say that I think the Bible is irrelevant, and how untrue, and worse that you know it not to be the case and yet chose to say it anyway. I came close to reporting this flame.
The new covenant in Jeremiah is future. The new covenant in Hebrews is now. They are not the same covenant.When I quoted the New Covenant you kept claiming it was still future.
NO, I POINTED TO YOUR POST AS IRRELEVANT. Sometimes a Bible verse is irrelevant if it is off topic to what is being discussed, but in this case your post in question didn't quote any Bible verses.I pointed to the Bible details above - you responded that they are irrelevant and that over time the traditions of men tied the Passover to passion week.
What do the mods have to do with it? I haven't broken any rules. If you think I have broken any rules, please quote from the offending post. If I need to edit a post I will.You can report that sort of post hoping that the mods will not look into the actual details
What do the mods have to do with it? I haven't broken any rules. If you think I have broken any rules, please quote from the offending post. If I need to edit a post I will.
NO, I POINTED TO YOUR POST AS IRRELEVANT. Sometimes a Bible verse is irrelevant if it is off topic
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?