The daughter is an American citizen. She is fourteen--high school age--and has grown up and lived her whole life here. She cannot be forcibly removed, and depending on the father's situation, telling him to take her with may not be in the child's best interests. But who in their right mind thinks it is in society's best interests to remove a child's last surviving parent and the breadwinner of the family unless he is a menace to society?
I thought the goal was to prevent more people from needing government assistance, not forcing girls like this child to need it by taking away the parent who was supporting them.
Unless this guy is a danger to society, what a horrible way to treat the surviving daughter of a servicemember who gave her life for the U.S. And what a horrible way to honor her sacrifice by ripping her family apart.