Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have no problem with that....she often ran around her home completely nude. Shameful stuff really.
You ever notice that a mention of Hillary, who I am not impressed with, always goes back to the viseral hate for her husband?Name me one woman who was "accosted" in the Clinton White House?
You ever notice that a mention of Hillary, who I am not impressed with, always goes back to the viseral hate for her husband?
its strange, really. Republicans hate Clinton for being succesful. They accuse Democrats of being crazy for hating Bush for being incompetent and a failure
No.
Clinton's just another excuse to pillory the Democrats who want a reform of the electoral college.
(Clinton never won the popular vote and for some reason, Democrats during his presidency didn't want to reform the electoral college..)
(Clinton never won the popular vote and for some reason, Democrats during his presidency didn't want to reform the electoral college..)
Kathleen Willey
According to Linda Tripps grand jury testimony, Tripp felt Willey pursued a romance with Clinton from the start of her White House affiliation. Willey had speculated with Tripp as to how she might be able to set up an assignation between herself and the president. She routinely attended events at which Clinton would be present, wearing a black dress she believed he liked. According to Tripps testimony, she wondered if she and Clinton could arrange to meet in a home to which she had access, on the Chesapeake Bay. According to Tripp, Willey had arranged the meeting in part to see if her flirtation with Clinton might advance. After Clinton and Willey met privately, Willey rushed back to Tripps office to describe the meeting. According to Tripp, Willey smiled from ear to ear the entire time as she described the event.
And according to Willey's testimony, she was sexually assaulted.If you are that shocked about an exaggerated incident from 1993, I suggest you pick up the paper tomorrow. You'll read about some more current incidents in the White House that should really spark your outrage.
And according to Willey's testimony, she was sexually assaulted.
Willey told Tripp that she and Clinton had "smooched," but made no mention of a sexual assault.
The Final Report of the US Office of the Independent Counsel report noted that "Willey gave false information to the FBI about her sexual relationship with a former boyfriend, and acknowledged having lied about it when the agents confronted her with contradictory evidence. Following Willeys acknowledgment of the lie, the Independent Counsel agreed not to prosecute her for false statements in this regard."
Willey has a history of controversial claims including telling the FBI she was pregnant and she had a miscarriage when she did not.
He didn't? Did you just arrive from a parallel universe? So tell me who won the popular vote?
1992:
http://www.presidentelect.org/e1992.html
Clinton - 43%
GHW Bush - 37.4%
Perot - 18.9%
Who won the popular vote? Perot?
Or maybe Perot won in 1996?
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe1996/summ.htm
Clinton - 49.2%
Dole - 40.7%
Perot - 8.4%
Um, more people wanted him to be President than wanted any other candidate to be President. Both times. He won the popular vote. Twice. You apparently are unaware of the difference between winning the popular vote (which he clearly did making your post dead wrong) and winning a majority vote when there are three major candidates. That's a bit sad really, that I understand your system better than you and I'm a foreigner. You were taught this stuff in school. Guess it didn't stick.By win, I meant receive a clear majority.
Thanks for those numbers though. You've shown that the first time he ran, most people didn't want him to be president, and the second time he ran, most people didn't want him to be president.
(Clinton never won the popular vote and for some reason, Democrats during his presidency didn't want to reform the electoral college..)
Your point is what? You're referencing endgames response to me not his initial post that I was addressing. He said Clinton did not win the popular vote. He did indeed win the popular vote. You agree with that don't you?That's true, but it's also true that most people voted for somebody else meaning that most people didn't want him to be President
And Engame clarified that what he meant by not winning the popular vote was that he never won a majority. Perhaps you missed thatYour point is what? You're referencing endgames response to me not his initial post that I was addressing. He said Clinton did not win the popular vote. He did indeed win the popular vote. You agree with that don't you?
Clinton won a majority of the electoral votes in both elections, in each case more than Bush.And Engame clarified that what he meant by not winning the popular vote was that he never won a majority. Perhaps you missed that
I didn't miss anything. Endgame can not change the definition of what it means to win the popular vote. Endgame was wrong and when I pointed that out he attempted to redefine what winning the popular vote means. And since you're backing him up, you're wrong too.And Engame clarified that what he meant by not winning the popular vote was that he never won a majority. Perhaps you missed that
He merely clarified what he meant. So what we know is that Clinton never won a majority of the popular vote, but he did win a majority of the electoral vote which means that most Americans who voted wanted someone other than Clinton to be president.I didn't miss anything. Endgame can not change the definition of what it means to win the popular vote. Endgame was wrong and when I pointed that out he attempted to redefine what winning the popular vote means. And since you're backing him up, you're wrong too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?