Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You are able to look back over years of criminal activity of the most destructive administration in American history, reserving your outrage for petty charges against the Clintons which even the right wing abandoned years ago. The focus of your determination is stunning.actually none of that stuff has been discredited. it has been only been answered with things like 'i don't know' or 'i don't remember'. the clintons greased enough palms to ensure others wouldn't testify that's all. your naivity is amusing...
You are able to look back over years of criminal activity of the most destructive administration in American history, reserving your outrage for petty charges against the Clintons which even the right wing abandoned years ago. The focus of your determination is stunning.
they aren't petty charges. they are all serious crimes that would land someone in federal prison for quite awhile.
when you find something to charge Bush with feel free to levy it. so far it seems you can't and the evidence is against you.
Which is why I've written my congresscritters and suggested a full investigation into Cheney's energy task force, the give aways to Halliburton, and the misuse of the intelligence community leading up to the invasion of Iraq.
Hillary is by no means innocent, or even remorseful, IMO, of alot of the things she's been accused of. But she did not play with American lives on the scale that Bush has done in the past seven years.
I think that if any of this stuff had any credibility, her opponents in the primary would be making good use of it, especially Edwards and Obama.
actually it has credibility but it is old. and the dem hopefuls don't want to focus on hillary because they can all continue to bash bush. when bush bashing gets old some of this might come up but i doubt it. they have hillary voting for the war to start using.
Funny, I hear the two front runners talk more about Hillary than I do about Bush. Especially during the debates.
paraphrased.We're not going to let people paw through our past,
WE"RE THE PRESIDENT.
paraphrased.
We must wonder how many women Bill harrassed, molested, raped, that Hillary was able to silence?
Clintons past events in the White house is enough to
know I don't want her running things.
when you find something to charge Bush with feel free to levy it. so far it seems you can't and the evidence is against you.
1 - violating his oath of office
2 - lying to Congress
3 - mobilizing the military using falsified justification
4 - violating the Geneva convention regarding torture
5 - using federal resources for purely political activities
6 - falsifying federal intelligence records
7 - revealing the name of a covert CIA operative
8 - misdirecting federal funds for personal profit
9 - interfering with federal voting records
10 - politicizing the Department of Justice
the evidence is against me? I'm just getting started. Let's see what you got on Kathleen Willey
We're trying to avoid a repeat of that administration by keeping the Clintons out of the Whitehouse.You are able to look back over years of criminal activity of the most destructive administration in American history, reserving your outrage for petty charges against the Clintons which even the right wing abandoned years ago. The focus of your determination is stunning.
We've seen eight years example of your choice in governing. Thanks, but I'd take the Clintons back any day.We're trying to avoid a repeat of that administration by keeping the Clintons out of the Whitehouse.
Versus all those women losing fathers, husbands, and sons in a war of choice.I'm sure the women who will most assuredly be accosted in the White House will disagree with you.
Which is why 95% of my post was about Clinton and Obama (in case you missed it).In case you guys missed, Dubya isn't running
Name me one woman who was "accosted" in the Clinton White House?I'm sure the women who will most assuredly be accosted in the White House will disagree with you.
In case you guys missed, Dubya isn't running
Yeah that most be it, all those Iraq deaths both here and abroad with the millions of refugees are just unrational emotional reactions.Seems to me like there is another thread here that claimed liberals didn't base their decisions on emotion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?