Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I agree. Trump's campaign has been mostly self-financed. By contrast, Hillary Clinton's campaign is financed by George Soros and other Wallstreet billionaires and Saudi Arabia and others. America will be on the auction block if she gets elected.The swamp of politics will not be drained until we (people) eliminate private campaign financing completely.
See the Citibank wikileaks post above.I agree. Trump's campaign has been mostly self-financed. By contrast, Hillary Clinton's campaign is financed by George Soros and other Wallstreet billionaires and Saudi Arabia and others. America will be on the auction block if she gets elected.
At one point, the Hillary Clinton campaign strategists even boasted openly about how they have way more money than Trump and how they were sure that Hillary Clinton would win the election because she has more money to blow on ads.See the Citibank wikileaks post above.
At one point, the Hillary Clinton campaign strategists even boasted openly about how they have way more money than Trump and how they were sure that Hillary Clinton would win the election because she has more money to blow on ads.
Sounds like she thinks they're shallow and is going to count on that to help get herself elected...And for the millennials out there...this is what the HRC campaign thinks of you:
Anthony Weiner?give it up...this is just pathetic...
The statute does not include "intent." That's the point.
Yes. How do documents which already have an originating source lose labels? Someone must remove them. No source necessary. Let's employ a bit of brain power.
Hillary's possession, access to or control over any document she was entitled to have in relation to her position would have been authorized.
On an approved and secure network. Not on an unsecured network at home.What's the proper place of custody for an email?
While I'm sure there are Gov't standards relating to attaching labels to digital files, are these always preserved in every email interaction?
Not on an unapproved private unsecured server not certified to contain, transmit and receive classified information.
Was she authorized to view the classified material? Check
Was she authorized to do both of the above outside of an approved compartment and on an unapproved, unsecured network? No.
The set up of a private server is the intent. Even though intent is not necessary to invoke the statute.
You might have noticed that copying and pasting parts of a larger document is a popular option here. That wouldn't preserve any such labels. But under the law you cited, that would be fine, as long as it wasn't transmitted in any of the dubious ways that law lays out, labels or no labels.
On an approved and secure network. Not on an unsecured network at home.
If someone discusses one of these verbally with a colleague, how should that document markup be retained?Yes they must be retained in every transmission. If they are not, it is called classified spillage which is a security violation requiring investigation and systems sanitation.
Safeguarding classified information is not comparable to interweb activity. Perhaps that was the problem.
We're talking about information exchanged between people who are entitled to have it - which clearly does not violate the statute you provided, however it was transmitted.Actually a lot of what people cut and paste on the internet to another location is copyright violation.
However we are not dealing with the unsecured unclassified network are we? We are talking about closely held national highly classified information.
Information which should NEVER been on a private server.
Then she didn't have unauthorized "access to" it, as per the statute. You ignore the rest of the requirements. What a surprise...
If the people who received it were entitled to do so, the statute is clearly not broken,
Sorry, that made my laugh out loud. Make your mind up, please...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?