Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nice,
Look at the size of these guys working on the megalith... And to think this is the same people who had cone shaped heads, built huge structures and created art with these giant people in them. Then we find giant skulls in this day and age shaped like the people in these works of ancient art....
No,,, must be hoax.... must not change history, must follow leader, don't question leader, teacher or news man.....
Nice,
So, your saying that the Egyptian artist purposefully painted the beings ultra large as a spoof, a trick. These paintings and other works of art were done as a record of history. Not some archaic trick photography.
Nice pic though. If it was me, I would do it in a manner that showed me pushing it over.....just my way of looking at things I guess.
Painting important figures as larger than life was an important artistic technique popular in ancient as well as medieval times.
Alternatively, Jesus was the tallest baby ever.
View attachment 166634
View attachment 166635
Yes, of course this is artistic license...
To compare two dimensional Egyptian hieroglyphics with the age of Renaissance where they were exploring the use of proper proportion is a great argument....again, sarcasm, Sheldon.
I see JacksBratt is an art historian now, where did you study? Youtube?
"back to reality"? really?Back to reality though, the bigger the size of the figure depicted the more important their place in the Egyptian hierarchy, it's a well known artistic convention.
Best you just slough it off as "baloney" and go live your life of bliss.
Yes, because the workers creating the megalith were of such grand status...... ok..... what ev's
For example, in Egyptian times, people of higher status would sometimes be drawn or sculpted larger than those of lower status.
Accept the observational evidence and your problems will resolve themselves.
Asian mates with Asian and produces ONLY Asian. African mates with African and produces ONLY African. Only when Asian and African mate is variation seen within the species or Kind. The Asian does not evolve into the Afro-Asian nor does the African evolve into the Afro-Asian.
Husky mates with Husky and produces ONLY Husky. Mastiff mates with Mastiff and produces ONLY Mastiff. Only when Husky and Mastiff mate is variation seen within the species or Kind. The Husky does not evolve into the Chinook nor does the Mastiff evolve into the Chinook.
Brown bears mate with Brown bears and produce ONLY Brown bears, Bottle-nosed dolphin mate with Bottle-nosed dolphin and produce ONLY Bottle-nosed dolphin, This is true for every animal in existence.
The problem lies in interpretation. If evolutionists had never seen a dog and knew nothing about them and found fossils of the Mastiff and Husky and then later in the layer found fossils of the Chinook, they would insist that either the Husky or the Mastiff evolved into the Chinook. We know from direct observation this is not what occurred, even if the Chinook appears later in the record. Worse yet, they would insist the Husky, Mastiff and Chinook were all separate species - simply because their appearances were different. Just as they have done in the fossil record.
These:
are no different than these:
Merely different infraspecific taxa in the species or Kind to which they belong - not separate species. They have simply ignored the observational evidence when it came time to classify the fossil record and have incorrectly classified 90% of the creatures that existed as separate species.
Theistic evolution starts from the same incorrect assumptions in their desire to feel they are practicing science - when evolution has no basis in science to begin with - but is based upon the requirement that we ignore all observational evidence of how life propagates and variation occurs within the species.
If Genesis is only allegory, then the message of death coming into the world through Adam's sin is only allegory. If death is normal (or in the case of evolution, required) then Jesus dying on the cross for our sins is not necessary (or not even welcome). I cannot see any way to make evolution compatible with special creation without throwing out the central message of the whole Bible, that man sinned and cannot be reconciled to God through his own efforts, but God made a way through Jesus.
What?Dad site tho.
I'd like to see that.If your source is Steven Greer, it is bogus. He's a known shyster and a liar. I have documentary evidence that he falsely reported his meetings with people and what they actually said. I tried to post it here but for some reason I couldn't. Be happy to send it to you via private email, however.
This intelligent race of people decided to depict their people the same height as these grand works of construction because..... the worker is important? people would understand that the weren't really this tall?
Yes, because the workers creating the megalith were of such grand status...... ok..... what ev's
Here ya go....
https://muhammadabdo.wordpress.com/...ent-egypt-the-giant-humans-forbidden-history/
Bingo.....If it's just a matter of understanding how the original audience would have understood Genesis, then there should be no other problems, no other contradictions. This is, after all, part of hermeneutics: interpreting Scripture with Scripture.
If Genesis is only allegory, then the message of death coming into the world through Adam's sin is only allegory. If death is normal (or in the case of evolution, required) then Jesus dying on the cross for our sins is not necessary (or not even welcome). I cannot see any way to make evolution compatible with special creation without throwing out the central message of the whole Bible, that man sinned and cannot be reconciled to God through his own efforts, but God made a way through Jesus.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?