• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Help, looking for church History from Protestant perspective

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
23,814
14,270
60
Sydney, Straya
✟1,454,604.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
From a Protestant perspective, the is a big blank spot betwen the Apostles and the Reformation. You would do better to look at Church history from a historical perspective. You will learn a lot more :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: seashale76
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,865
✟344,561.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
From a Protestant perspective, the is a big blank spot betwen the Apostles and the Reformation.

Really? Have you read any church history books written by Protestants?

Kenneth Latourette (a Baptist), in his A History of Christianity, devotes over 600 pages to the period from the Apostles to 1500.
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Radagast said:
There are lots and lots of good books out there. If you want something simple, here is a timeline from Christianity Today.
It's interesting that nearly all the "events" on that timeline are "so and so wrote such and such a document"
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
23,814
14,270
60
Sydney, Straya
✟1,454,604.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Really? Have you read any church history books written by Protestants?

Kenneth Latourette (a Baptist), in his A History of Christianity, devotes over 600 pages to the period from the Apostles to 1500.
I was being facetious since many Protestant Christians only seem to be familiar with "Trail of Blood" for Church 'history'

A good resource from a Protestant historian is Philip Schaff. His work is available online at CCEL
Philip Schaff - Christian Classics Ethereal Library - Christian Classics Ethereal Library

Actually, there's a whole lot more here
http://m.ccel.org/index/subject/history
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Kenneth Latourette (a Baptist), in his A History of Christianity, devotes over 600 pages to the period from the Apostles to 1500.

That ^ would be a good choice, BigChristfilm.

There's also the noted Protestant scholar, Roland Bainton, and his book Christianity. It follows a chronological format and most of it is devoted to the period between the era of the Apostles and the beginning of the Reformation.
 
Upvote 0

pshun2404

Newbie
Jan 26, 2012
6,027
620
✟86,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Why not just read the ante-Nicene fathers, then Eusibius History of the Church then the post-Nicene fathers, then Aquinas, Luther, Calvin, Arminius, the Synod of Dort, and so on...I mean why just read someone's summations and opinions...read the development for yourself...I know it will take time, but it will be much more enriching. Do it slowly over time (along with your Bible study of course, that should be primary, but even that...simply read what it says and if you have questions on a viewpoint study the whole counsel of God on each matter)

I have read most of this over about a decade and still have not covered it all so I know it is painstaking...but I have found that most modern historians engage everything from a preconceived conclusion or else reject too much without considering all that any of these people actually said...

Paul
 
Upvote 0

pshun2404

Newbie
Jan 26, 2012
6,027
620
✟86,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Why not just read the ante-Nicene fathers, then Eusibius History of the Church then the post-Nicene fathers, then Aquinas, Luther, Calvin, Arminius, the Synod of Dort, and so on...I mean why just read someone's summations and opinions...read the development for yourself...I know it will take time, but it will be much more enriching. Do it slowly over time (along with your Bible study of course, that should be primary, but even that...simply read what it says and if you have questions on a viewpoint study the whole counsel of God on each matter)

After more than a decade I am still learning...loving every minute of it too!

Paul
 
Upvote 0

GreekOrthodox

Psalti Chrysostom
Oct 25, 2010
4,120
4,198
Yorktown VA
✟191,432.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
If you are interested in a view of Roman / Byzantine history with some Christianity thrown in, there are two podcasts I recommend, The History of Rome (Mike Duncan) and The History of Byzantium (Robin Pierson) on iTunes. It is helpful to see what was going on in the rest of the empire as Christianity was growing.
 
Upvote 0

Shane R

Priest
Site Supporter
Jan 18, 2012
2,504
1,372
Southeast Ohio
✟742,132.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Widowed
I have seen many such timelines in my days. I even made one once when I was an adherent. However, though those timelines may tell an interesting story they do not tell an accurate story. In truth, Protestant thought cannot be traced to the time of the apostles. It is a reaction to the abuses of a particular time and place and picks up with the Lollards, then the Hussites, Lutherans, etc.

In the ancient church one sees reactions to the heresies of the day, whether Gnosticism, Manichaeanism, or the Christological heresies. Different time, different issues.
 
Upvote 0

Alive_Again

Resident Alien
Sep 16, 2010
4,167
231
✟20,491.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
In the ancient church one sees reactions to the heresies of the day, whether Gnosticism, Manichaeanism, or the Christological heresies. Different time, different issues.
Similar methods of dealing with them. The closer they were to Jesus' time, the more peaceable they were. After that, you could tell criminals were at the helm.

I've been studying church history pretty heavily for the last 8 months.
It's interesting and challenging to see what the early church encountered in the formulation of doctrines and beliefs. In a way it's good that there were 2 main churches. It allowed for some variance without killing each other.

It's refreshing to see where councils condemned heresy and dis-fellowshipped various people without actually killing them.
That came later, but it was a common theme. Usually it was guided by the church directly or indirectly imparted "guidance" that heresy should not be tolerated.

When the church finally became "legitimatized" by Rome and pagan churches became illegal, a lot of unbelievers "joined the church" for political expediency. Can you imagine what that did to the flow of services?

Tales of Roman soldiers riding through rivers to be baptized en masse exist. After Rome fell, the church was the only thing in place that resembled the empire.

Frankish leaders like Clovis, Pepin, and Charlemagne began to conquer in the name of the church. People would be killed if they practiced any form of paganism. Like all peoples of all times, man had a desire to worship and the ones who didn't understand Christianity turned to their gods for protection. Many of these people were killed! I believe it's a spirit that was at work. You don't kill people for not converting.

Anway, the Lombards were threatening Italy and the Pope turned to the Franks. In what has turned out to be typical of Popish behavior for centuries after, the Pope intervened in temporal matters, manipulating kings for "spiritual ends". He "approved" of Pepin (of the Franks) to take over the throne from the legitimate ruler and blessed the takeover. Pepin then came down and drove out the Lombards.

After the creation of the Holy Roman Empire (another power play), a tug of war ensued between Pope and Emperor for control. When things didn't go like the Popes wanted, they put an "interdict" on you that basically stopped all services to that city or even the whole country! They expected the people to rise up and put them out of power (if they didn't conform).

They would "excommunicate" individuals or rulers and then invite other rulers to invade them. Do you see any of the apostles doing anything like this? But the Pentecost experience seemed to elude much of the church.

A pattern had formed though for dealing with those who do not submit to the authority of "the church". It could cost you your life.

Anyway a study of the Popes was absolutely stunning. It was so bad that I basically just confined myself to Catholic sources; various bishops, church historians, Catholic Encyclopedia, etc. Although they certainly understate, downplay, and whitewash some of it, the truth is there.

The papacy, just like bishoprics were bought and sold at various times.
At one time it was controlled by a political faction (led by a woman) that appointed popes and replaced them (sometimes by murdering them). Shortly after that was the "reign of the harlots"; then the schism. Without a break it goes right into the crusades, of which horrible attrocities occurred. Then the murder of the Cathars, Albigenses, Waldensians, the inquisition, etc.

Then the battle for the Word of God! The hunt for those who would provide the scriptures (the truth!) to the common people. The reformation and the murder of those who want the freedom to worship as they choose. It seems so obvious now, but people gave their lives for the privilege. And the popes were responsible for a lot of it. They in no way resemble the popes of this century.

There's no need to just look at it from a protestant perspective, but look at it as what Paul prophesied. The reformation (if you could only see how degrading church leadership had become) was the beginning... The Medici pope at the time wasn't even a cleric when he became pope. They moved him through the ranks in several days.

Powerful Roman families would wrangle for the papal seat. When you read it, you see how carnal the whole thing had become.

After months of reading and hearing about these "false apostles", I'd find out about another group and how a pope would take their leader and burn them at the stake. If 60 Minutes could get ahold of these guys now. Instead of trying to link with them back to the early church, they'd be distancing themselves from the wickdness in His name.

One thing really stuck with me, if it were wrong for Israel to have a king, what makes the church think it needs a monarch? That's what they were... temporal rulers who wore crowns.

Jesus is the Head of the church, and a vicar (means "in place of") is the same definition for Anti-(Christ). When Jesus has free reign over His Body, the gates of Hell will not prevail.

It's like a "spell" that has been put on Catholics, who willingly comply according to conscience. When you read how certain dogmas came about (i.e., infallability), and who was behind them, you see the carnal church at work. Did you know that the infallabiity thing was the last act of that council? The country was being invaded and they were attempting to assert their power (in the last hour). Many were not in favor of the choice they took. A couple of cardinals left in protest that even a suggestion like that would be made.

I'm sure this is hard to hear for a Catholic and even harder to believe, but look into it. See how many groups were murdered, tortured, etc. There's no excuse at all. See how they manipulated kings and emperors; even changing sides when one would get too powerful. Incredible.

BTW, I love Catholics have great compassion for them, but the history of the church speaks for itself in that department. Thank God for the reformation, which is still going on. Great hope for Catholics too.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

dmpeace

Junior Member
May 26, 2007
2,117
358
✟25,374.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Hey guys, I'm wondering if someone knows of a good resource that can show a time line from close to Christ's resurrection to today. From a Protestant perspective. Anything like that out there?

Just read from the book of Acts on through church history. The pagan Roman Catholic church really didn't take shape until around the year 1200.
 
Upvote 0

Exodus20

Newbie
Mar 30, 2013
76
19
Visit site
✟22,742.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Hey guys, I'm wondering if someone knows of a good resource that can show a time line from close to Christ's resurrection to today. From a Protestant perspective. Anything like that out there?

:wave: Hello. The Thread title is different from the Thread question ... but since I R a :cool: guy who can actually read what you posted --- rather than give you an answer that you did NOT ask for ... :p

... , and I am a Protestant { Yes! I Protest the il popa at Roma claiming to be the Head Honcho over all Christianity ! }... Thus - I will help you , and not even charge a fee !

For a Christian History Timeline go to the website of "Rose Publications" and look around. Good stuff ! { btw - Get the laminated one. They last longer and will be more portable. } ( I can't post links until I have more posts to my credit. argh! ) . They have many good charts from wall size to fold up fit -in-your-notebook/brief case.

For Christian History Books from a Protestant ( aka; biblical and real historical perspective ) you have several to read from and learn.

"Christianity Through The Centuries " by Earle Cairns.

"Christendom" by Roland Bainton { Also ,get his "Here I Stand!" }

"Christianity Through The Ages" by K.S. Latourette

Eerdman's Handbook to the History of Christianity ? ( Edited by Tom Dowley --- Lost mine in a move...:sigh: ) --- Several photos & drawings & maps & timelines in the book. You can find one used for a good price. { amazon dot com has several for very low prices...So sad that people don't care about History...}

"Halley's Bible Handbook" has a small , condensed History section which is rather good. For the price , it is a great all around reference/study tool.

Another one is titled "Sketches from Church History "( iirc ) by Houghton. I have seen it , but never read it. My 30ish daughter has it and she likes it.

Unless you have a rich relative --- yaa might want to shop around at Used Book shops / Friends of the Library sales / Garage/Yard sales / Salvation Army - Goodwill Stores / e-bay / amazon dot com ... there are bargains out there . A couple of years ago in a 2nd hand store ... I found a Thompson Chain-Reference Bible , leather , near new condition for $2.00 - Christmas in July !!!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0