Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How would one consolidate the idea of worship of an omni-benevolent creator with his opening a fire pit first meant for Satan and his angels. So as to allow fallen humans to also suffer for eternity?
I agree that the "Hell" that many believe in doesn't exist. However, I would submit that the dead are not currently suffering.
This word conjures up a variety of scenarios and has been used as a club wielded by the clergy for hundreds of years to keep funds coming in and in return, the clergy would attempt to keep the faithful from the clutches of hell.
Now, let's get down to it. The English word "Hell" does not have its origin in the Hebrew or Greek. It originates in an old anglo-saxon word with two variations in spelling: Helle and Helan Its original definition is a hidden place.
Translators took this word and substituted it in place of four other words in the original text, and these are as follows:
Sheol = Hebrew- meaning the grave.
Hades = Greek - meaning a hidden place
Gehenna = Greek - the garbage pit where fires consumed refuse tossed into it.
Tartarus = Homer, who used this word as the underground prison for the giants. This word is only found once where it was substituted for Hell. The early revisers changed the phrase "Thrown down to tartarus" and switched it to hell.
Each and every time the reader comes across the word hell it is one of these other terms.
Now, if one takes all these words and meanings and lumps them together you get a scene of a hidden place, where the dead go, an underground pit where fires burn unceasingly. Frightful picture is it not? That was their aim. I hate to think of how many church goers lived their whole lives in fear of going to a place which does not exist.
Hell is not the lake of fire, which will be a one time event at the end of the millennium.
Those who go into that will be utterly consumed - a final death. Satan will also go into this lake. He is the son of perdition. Perdition means to turn to ash from within and without - to perish.
Now I know that there are people that wish there was a hell, for we all want evil doers, murderers, rapists, kidnappers etc. to burn in hell for eternity as just reward for their evil.....I am with you. But since it is not real, then what?
The rich man could see Lazarus with Christ across a gulf that could not be crossed.
Being held in that state was torture of a kind and there are a great many metaphors and figures of speech and idioms one can sort through.....feeling as one's mouth and tongue are on fire and so forth. A self realization that the rich man as well as countless others are there until the millennium. Those from before were freed by Christ when he rose, but all the rest must remain for now. For the student interested in more information about the millennial period, read the last 8 or 9 chapters of the book of Ezekiel.
Now after the lake of fire event, it will be sealed over and done away with along with all and any memory of those who went into it.
Heaven is where God is and since the full Godhead defacto will be here on earth, you cannot have an open burning lake and thoughts of screaming tortured souls in it and have peace and no more tears. It would not be Heaven.
There are two purposes for the notion of an eternal torturous hell.
1. From Satans point of view: he wants to tarnish God's image and cause people to think He is vindictive and harsh and will show no mercy. He will crush anyone who slips. "Be ye perfect" or you'll get your just desserts.
2. From the churches point of view: hell is great for scaring parishoners into submission. Its also a suitable punishment for those heathen that just kept smoking cigarettes when we warned them that God hates tobbacco.
The Book of Jude says they are punished in "eternal fire."
You seem to be arguing with the Book of Jude, and so arguing with the Bible.
They serve as an example if you believe what the Bible says.
Good post. This website may help you in your study, rethinkinghell.comYou've opened up an interesting question. I will have to do a lot more research on this to come to a conclusion. I don't know how many times I've gone to the Lord in prayer and asked Him "why is it necessary that people would suffer for eternity. Why don't You simply put them to sleep?" We all know there are people who live a very good life, are very kind and loving, sometimes they even live a moral life that puts some Christians (like me) to shame. So, they reject God's plan for salvation and miss eternity in the presence of God. Why then can't they simply just go to sleep and never wake? Have they really deserved to suffer for eternity? It's always bothered me. It's not that I reject the idea of hell outright but it certainly doesn't seem to fit God's loving grace. Maybe I won't know the answer until I enter eternity but I'm sure going to do some more research on it. Many atheists and agnostics use the excuse of "no Hell" to live the way they want to. Many religions such as Jehovah's Witness began because the founder could not except the idea of an eternal Hell. So instead of living their life according to the Gospel, they reject the parts of the Gospel they don't like and rewrite The Word of God. Whether you believe in Hell or not, rewriting God's Word is a really, really a stupid thing to do!!!
Like the OP, I spent time with my KJV, the OED (the most authoritative English dictionary known to man), a Strong's, a Young's, and a slew of www resources. With these tools, I ran the origins of sheol, hades, gehenna, hell, and tartarus to ground. The most telling thing I found about Hell is that in one of the old languages and mythologies of pagan north Europe, the goddess or ogress of the underworld was called "Hel," and her realm went by the same name. In the wide scope of the breadth of Indo-European languages, I see this as a direct parallel of the Greek Hades: goddess and realm.
Again, I pose a question: "Hel" is pagan, but "Hell" is Christian?
I'm not getting your point here.
The point is that some Christians use the parable of the rich man and Lazarus for doctrine on Hell....but it is not.OK, what is not getting across? I try to be as plain as I can.
The point is that some Christians use the parable of the rich man and Lazarus for doctrine on Hell....but it is not.
I agree with the lesson the parable teaches...The post in question does not mention that parable. Having stepped on Butch5's implied question, maybe you could explain which side of the parable you fall on...
I agree with the lesson the parable teaches...
But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.’
That is happening today even now.In the same way, if people have a carnal need to believe in something, their carnality will fight anything trying to persuade them otherwise. In the case of Hell, they are not willing to give up believing that their personal enemies are going to Hell, even though their Lord and Savior told them to move on to forgiveness. They never realize that they, too, are someone's personal enemy, and that compared to Jesus the Christ, we are all wicked.
I suspect that the base problem with those not persuaded in Jesus' time, and those not persuaded today, is that they read the Word of God through theological filters, and if not in the original languages, in Bibles translated through theological filters.
OK, what is not getting across? I try to be as plain as I can.
I'm not sure what you're asking in your question. Are you asking if hell is real or f it comes from pagan religions?
OK, I think we're on the same page now. To answer you, what I have been doing is trying to determine if Hell, word and concept, is in the Bible, or if Hell, word and concept, came from some other source. My study of pagan European mythology, brief as it was, was enough to tell me where the word came from. A study of the KJV showed that the concept did not come from there, but we all know that every (or nearly every) pagan religion had something like Hell. Further, knowing of the syncretism in Christianity as it came into contact with pagan culture after pagan culture, I think it's a safe bet that it came from an external source. It's just like the pagan holiday of Samhain becoming "Christian" by it being given a new name like "All Hallows Eve," or "All Saints' Eve" or just "Halloween." My pagan daughter gleefully tells me that "Christianity has pagan DNA." She is correct, but I am trying to rid my understanding of Christianity of any "pagan DNA."
Agreed, Christmas too is of pagan origin. [Nonsense!] However, you can tell your pagan daughter that Christianity has no pagan DNA. It's what is taught today as Christianity that has the pagan DNA.[Nonsense!] It was through a study of early Christianity that I came to realize that what is taught today is very different than what was taught in the beginning.[Nonsense!] They are so different that they almost different religions, in my opinion.[Nonsense!]
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?