Lately I have been studying the subjects of healing and sickness in the Bible. I wanted to share some thoughts and see if any of you have any insight to offer.
One thing that is very evident is that Jesus healed multitudes while he was on the earth in physical form. He healed all types of people--those who had fevers, the blind, those possessed with devils, etc. Also in the book of Acts, many were healed in the name of Jesus when the apostles laid hands on them, etc.
The matter I have been considering is what place healing has in the church today. I firmly believe that Jesus still has power to heal today, though he is not physically present with us. I have no problem whatsoever with someone praying for healing when they are sick, or asking others to pray for them. Yet I am very skeptical of charismatic healing services. I will not question that some people may have been healed in such meetings. However, neither would I question that unsaved people have fallen under conviction and been saved in a bar or a wild party. God can work anywhere, but that does not necessarily mean He approves of other things that are taking place where the miracle occurs.
So I have been pondering on the way the Bible teaches to be right in handling matters of sickness/healing. Thus far, I have not found that every Christian in Acts had the God-given power to heal which Peter and Paul possessed. Also, in James 5, we are told that the sick should call for the elders of the church to pray for them and anoint them with oil that they might be healed. We are not told, however, to just ask any Spirit filled Christian to anoint us with oil, but rather the elders of the church. Does this mean that only the elders of a church (those in authority) are ordained by God to exercise the gift of healing?
I believe that any and every Christian should lift sick brothers and sisters up in their prayers. Yet I am wondering if, when it comes to anointing, laying on of hands, etc. it should only be the leaders of the church who do this.
So what do you all think?
One thing that is very evident is that Jesus healed multitudes while he was on the earth in physical form. He healed all types of people--those who had fevers, the blind, those possessed with devils, etc. Also in the book of Acts, many were healed in the name of Jesus when the apostles laid hands on them, etc.
The matter I have been considering is what place healing has in the church today. I firmly believe that Jesus still has power to heal today, though he is not physically present with us. I have no problem whatsoever with someone praying for healing when they are sick, or asking others to pray for them. Yet I am very skeptical of charismatic healing services. I will not question that some people may have been healed in such meetings. However, neither would I question that unsaved people have fallen under conviction and been saved in a bar or a wild party. God can work anywhere, but that does not necessarily mean He approves of other things that are taking place where the miracle occurs.
So I have been pondering on the way the Bible teaches to be right in handling matters of sickness/healing. Thus far, I have not found that every Christian in Acts had the God-given power to heal which Peter and Paul possessed. Also, in James 5, we are told that the sick should call for the elders of the church to pray for them and anoint them with oil that they might be healed. We are not told, however, to just ask any Spirit filled Christian to anoint us with oil, but rather the elders of the church. Does this mean that only the elders of a church (those in authority) are ordained by God to exercise the gift of healing?
I believe that any and every Christian should lift sick brothers and sisters up in their prayers. Yet I am wondering if, when it comes to anointing, laying on of hands, etc. it should only be the leaders of the church who do this.
So what do you all think?