I have no desire to continue with anyone who keeps saying when I have valid points that I am putting them down or calling them an idiot. As Der Alter has said,
"
Actually your post is "poisoning the well." You falsely accuse Fred of a logical fallacy for the purpose of trying to discredit everything else he says."
Der Alter has made good points on the scriptural support for the deity of Jesus and for belief out of the Bible for the trinity. I appreciate it, we should take them seriously.
I should respond to points from it'sme.
>1 In [the] beginning the Word was, and the
Word was with God, and the Word was a god. 2 This one was in [the] beginning
with God. 3 All things came into existence
through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence.
Our translation 'a' God, ( because the bible says there are many God's).
>Orthodox Christianity is wrong on their stand that Jesus is Jehovah. The bible says there are many Gods and many Lords. So there is no problem, with calling Jesus God, but he is not Jehovah God. Satan is called the God of this system of things. Does that make Satan Jehovah also? So this term God can mean different things to different people. Jesus is one with Jehovah just like Jesus followers are one with him. It just means unity.
You say these things that Christ is another god and the Bible says there are many gods right before the next part of my message you respond to which quotes from Isaiah:
"Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any. I am Yahweh, and there is none else, there is no God beside me"`
There are other gods mentioned in the Bible, but they are so from human recognition, God as we see does not acknowledge any other being as truly God. Satan is not approved to be a god, only acknowledged as such with human recognition. If Jesus made claim to being a god in addition to the one called "Father", he would have been ungodly as a deceiver and should not be believed. There is only one according to God, any others are not approved by him.
>But even if you don't accept that these verses he was 'with' God and it was 'through' him. This is odd language becasue how can you be with someone and still be that person? You have to go to the rest of the bible to get a clearer understanding. The bible even says they are one. But the bible also says we are are one with, with Jesus. It just means in unity, we are one.
You should at least believe what Jesus said. This is after he was resurrected and on his way to Jehovah.
In Colossians 1 v 16, right from in the Greek, "because by him were created all things" meaning Christ is Creator, and so he is God, who is the one Creator. Using "being reasonable" to differ from seeing this is not truly justified, he can be with the other person who is God, he would not be that person, but in the union with that other as one being, is God.
>Jesus had a prehuman existence. He was called Micheal in the bible.
Your view.
>Jesus was the word meaning he explained God to us, and Jehovah is the only true God Jesus is his Son.
This is an interpretation.
>(Psalm 83:18) That people may know that you, whose
name is Jehovah, You
alone are the Most High over all the earth.
>This scripture does not include Jesus or the Holy spirit in this.
By your interpretation.
>"Philippians 2v5-6:
Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus.
Who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery
to be equal with God. But made himself of no reputation,
taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the
likeness of men."
>This scripture means that Jesus didn't consider himself equal to God. He never was. The bible say he is the image of God that means exactly alike, But not the same person. Jesus was created but Jehovah wasn't.
It is your reinterpretation that scripture does not mean that. It actually does. As it says directly from the Greek, "Who in form of God subsisting" which clearly indicates that the Lord Jesus subsisted of the form of God. So it was not robbery to be equal with God. This is why Jews wanted to stone him, it was only for blasphemy, because he made himself equal with God by saying he and the Father were one, so no, it never meant the same thing as we being one, and again when he said "before Abraham was I am", identifying himself as Yahweh, who alone uses "I am" rightfully.
>This sacred secret is about Jesus, and who he is Jesus is God's Son.
The people you say wrongly believe in the trinity still understand that Jesus is the begotten Son of God. That is not a secret to them.
>This idea of the trinity is from pagan religions.
Der Alter made those excellent references that show that is not true. it'sme, you have not yet shown any three who are named from pagan beliefs that were considered to be one god.
>That is exactly why you take the bible as the final word.
There no trinity in the bible. That is a doctrine that is made up by man.
Jesus many time says he is God's Son. Jehovah , when Jesus was being baptized, said this is my Son who I have approved, and then at John 20:17
I do not know if this message was also for me, but as can be seen there are many supporting passages. It is not true that just because there is not a word found in the Bible, or anywhere, it does not exist. Many things it turns out are true according to the Bible without a word for anyone of them being found in the Bible. We agree, if it is your position in truth, to take the Bible as the final word.