- Jul 30, 2005
- 7,825
- 403
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Why is it that I am seeing so much emphasis here on the importance of "having a good time"?
And it seems that people consider "beer" and "having a good time" to be synonymous.
Nobody drinks beer simply for, say, the taste?
I do not go "out" to have iced tea. I go to a restaurant that serves iced tea because, well, I want the refreshment and nourishment and I want to enjoy the taste of it. That almost sounds like Diet Coke--"Just for the taste of it".
Let me guess, the hospitality industry, the alcoholic beverage industry, etc. make money by selling a "good time". If people did not want to "have a good time" then many businesses would not exist--people would not suddenly go to those places for, say, a nourishing meal.
Okay, I think I understand the economics of "having a good time". And to some extent I think I understand the sociology of "having a good time".
What I do not understand is this attitude that says that those of us who do not "have a good time" are somehow flawed or living inferior lives.
I guess I owe a lot of what I have enjoyed to people's desire to "have a good time". Apparently if people did not "have a good time" with, say, American football, then American football would not exist for those of us who experience it almost purely out of personal interest.
I do not have to go "out" and I do not have to be "with friends" to have any use for things like ball games. I can go to the ballpark by myself and get satisfaction from concentrating on the drama unfolding on the field. No need to "have a good time".
Yet, apparently those of us who do not need or want to "have a good time" need to "get a life". And, furthermore, apparently those of us who do not need or want to "have a good time" must be mentally ill, have a personality disorder, are of poor moral character, etc.
I can understand the social phenomenon of "having a good time". But I can't understand why anybody feels threatened by those who see little need to "have a good time". I do not understand why those who value "having a good time" feel the need to criticize, ridicule, pathologize and indict those of us who do not share that value.
If I only enjoy quietly watching the ripples in the lake--if I never "have a good time" fishing or water skiing in the lake--who really cares?
And it seems that people consider "beer" and "having a good time" to be synonymous.
Nobody drinks beer simply for, say, the taste?

I do not go "out" to have iced tea. I go to a restaurant that serves iced tea because, well, I want the refreshment and nourishment and I want to enjoy the taste of it. That almost sounds like Diet Coke--"Just for the taste of it".
Let me guess, the hospitality industry, the alcoholic beverage industry, etc. make money by selling a "good time". If people did not want to "have a good time" then many businesses would not exist--people would not suddenly go to those places for, say, a nourishing meal.
Okay, I think I understand the economics of "having a good time". And to some extent I think I understand the sociology of "having a good time".
What I do not understand is this attitude that says that those of us who do not "have a good time" are somehow flawed or living inferior lives.
I guess I owe a lot of what I have enjoyed to people's desire to "have a good time". Apparently if people did not "have a good time" with, say, American football, then American football would not exist for those of us who experience it almost purely out of personal interest.
I do not have to go "out" and I do not have to be "with friends" to have any use for things like ball games. I can go to the ballpark by myself and get satisfaction from concentrating on the drama unfolding on the field. No need to "have a good time".
Yet, apparently those of us who do not need or want to "have a good time" need to "get a life". And, furthermore, apparently those of us who do not need or want to "have a good time" must be mentally ill, have a personality disorder, are of poor moral character, etc.
I can understand the social phenomenon of "having a good time". But I can't understand why anybody feels threatened by those who see little need to "have a good time". I do not understand why those who value "having a good time" feel the need to criticize, ridicule, pathologize and indict those of us who do not share that value.
If I only enjoy quietly watching the ripples in the lake--if I never "have a good time" fishing or water skiing in the lake--who really cares?