• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Hashin it out

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

GratiaCorpusChristi

Guest
Mel, everyone else seems to agree that we arent redefining the nicene creed, we are taking the present definition and closing heretical loopholes.

I suggest we do this by the simplest means possible. The simplest means is to use the present definition and work from that in order not to be bogged down
Or introducing heretical loopholes, by saying that [belief in/...] baptism for the forgiveness of sins isn't required for salvation.
 
Upvote 0

stumpjumper

Left the river, made it to the sea
Site Supporter
May 10, 2005
21,189
846
✟93,636.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Do you suggest that christians shouldnt use as good judgement as the world uses?

I don't understand the question.

Should we use reason and rationality to understand the Bible and even boldly claim what is right and true? Sure.

Should we have public discussions about what constitutes Christian orthodoxy? Sure.

Should we judge the salvation of others? No.

We can, and should IMO, affirm the uniqueness of Christianity and what God has done for us through Christ but that does not mean that we need or even should use those statements in the manner is which you are proposing.

We do not need to turn the Good News into Bad News.

We should not use the Gospel as a forensic tool to determine who just ain't gonna make it all the way.

It's not for us to decide nor should it be...

We should be without common sence?

My mommy always said I had the bestest common sense of all :D
 
Upvote 0

Time2BCounted

Holding Christian Standard High At ForU.ms
Aug 5, 2007
4,085
350
✟5,834.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Or introducing heretical loopholes, by saying that [belief in/...] baptism for the forgiveness of sins isn't required for salvation.


Brother
Thus far, catholics, lutherans and most others agree that baptism in itself doesnt save us. Do you agree?
 
Upvote 0

Melethiel

Miserere mei, Domine
Site Supporter
Jun 8, 2005
27,287
940
35
Ohio
✟99,593.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Mel, everyone else seems to agree that we arent redefining the nicene creed, we are taking the present definition and closing heretical loopholes.

I suggest we do this by the simplest means possible. The simplest means is to use the present definition and work from that in order not to be bogged down
Then you should have no problem with

1. Making your "clarifications" clearly distinct from the Creed.
2. Not placing beliefs about Scripture that may not be held by everyone above belief in God.
 
Upvote 0

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,337
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,229.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You can beware of someone, wipe the dust off your sandals and move on, and even claim that what they believe is heresy as far as I'm concerned but there is a clear and distinct commandment within the Bible about not judging another's salvation.

If someone like T2BC wants to argue that we need to stick to what the Bible says about Jesus then you should also stick to what the Bible says about judging others.

Jesus said: "Judge not lest ye be judged."

St Paul clearly stated that it is the Lord who judges.

I am not the Lord. I will not judge another person's eternal salvation...
Have you studied the "judge not" verses? If you pay special attention, you'll notice the theme in them is that when you are doing the same things you judge others of, YOU BRING JUDGMENT ONTO YOURSELF.

It isn't saying "use no discernment" "do not test the spirits", "do not use any evaluation as to what doctrine one comes with"... does it?
Otherwise, Jesus indeed leave us as helpless orphans down here without any way to use any discernment as to false teachers, what's evil, what's right or anything else.

I think you should do a study on judging. Jesus also said not to judge "by mere appearance, but use righteous judgment". (John 7:24)

He never said don't judge anything -- you make judgments & assessements every single day, and so do I.
In fact, PAUL taught us to judge those INSIDE THE CHURCH, not outside the church.
1 Cor. 5 12 For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside?
13 But those who are outside God judges.

We judge, we're to do it correctly and not be hypocrites in doing the same sins we point out in others.
Not to condemn others - but for awareness and truth.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.