• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Has Joe Read Roe?

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
184,158
67,248
Woods
✟6,048,389.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The president’s bad debate night can’t excuse the misleading statements he made about U.S. abortion law.

President Joe Biden’s disastrous June 27 debate performance was alarming on many fronts. But there was one element that was particularly troubling for pro-life Americans: his garbled articulation of Roe v. Wade.

Biden reveres Roe. Never mind that he disagreed with its reasoning as a freshman senator when it came out 51 years ago. Today, it’s his fifth gospel, the lynchpin of his abortion-focused presidency and now-faltering reelection campaign.

You might recall the exchange Biden had two years ago on the South Lawn of the White House with EWTN White House Correspondent Owen Jensen. Just before the president flew away aboard Marine One, Jensen managed to ask him if he thought there should be any restrictions on abortion.

“Yes, there should be,” Biden responded. 

When Jensen asked what those restrictions should be, Biden yelled back, “It’s Roe v. Wade. Read it, man. You’ll get educated,” before hurrying off to the helicopter.

The question is: Has Joe read Roe?

Continued below.
 

Offline4Better.

Christian
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,384
7,707
✟668,648.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The president’s bad debate night can’t excuse the misleading statements he made about U.S. abortion law.

President Joe Biden’s disastrous June 27 debate performance was alarming on many fronts. But there was one element that was particularly troubling for pro-life Americans: his garbled articulation of Roe v. Wade.

Biden reveres Roe. Never mind that he disagreed with its reasoning as a freshman senator when it came out 51 years ago. Today, it’s his fifth gospel, the lynchpin of his abortion-focused presidency and now-faltering reelection campaign.

You might recall the exchange Biden had two years ago on the South Lawn of the White House with EWTN White House Correspondent Owen Jensen. Just before the president flew away aboard Marine One, Jensen managed to ask him if he thought there should be any restrictions on abortion.

“Yes, there should be,” Biden responded. 

When Jensen asked what those restrictions should be, Biden yelled back, “It’s Roe v. Wade. Read it, man. You’ll get educated,” before hurrying off to the helicopter.

The question is: Has Joe read Roe?

Continued below.
Has Joe read Roe on the Joe Roe-gain show or no, bro. ;)

Alright, that was a dumb tongue-twister. But yes, Joe might need to brush up on laws.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Michie
Upvote 0

Bobber

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2004
7,021
3,452
✟245,173.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Has Joe read Roe on the Joe Roe-gain show or no, bro. ;)

Alright, that was a dumb tongue-twister. But yes, Joe might need to brush up on laws.
Please don't make Joe have to do tongue-twisters and having them come out right!

OR....maybe they should make it a coherency test on stage for every candidate for both Biden and Trump. OK boys you're going to take turns saying this as fast as you can! OK Joe you're first.....GO!!!!!

She sells seashells by the seashore!

And now this,

How much wood would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

And lastly this!

Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers.

At least it's better than having them say, I'm a good guy....no you're not I am! Nope it's the other way around!
 
Upvote 0

Offline4Better.

Christian
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,384
7,707
✟668,648.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Please don't make Joe have to do tongue-twisters and having them come out right!

OR....maybe they should make it a coherency test on stage for every candidate for both Biden and Trump. OK boys you're going to take turns saying this as fast as you can! OK Joe you're first.....GO!!!!!

She sells seashells by the seashore!

And now this,

How much wood would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

And lastly this!

Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers.

At least it's better than having them say, I'm a good guy....no you're not I am! Nope it's the other way around!
Haha, good one.
 
Upvote 0

Offline4Better.

Christian
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,384
7,707
✟668,648.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Would be funny though wouldn't it be. Viewership would increase 100 fold where people would tune in to see if they could do it. Not even sure I could. :)
Yeah. Viewership would increase by a lot. Anyways, it is getting late here, and tomorrow, I have to work on a devotional covering Job 38:1; 8-11, Mark 4:35-41, Matthew 7:24-27, Lamentations 3:19-24, and Psalm 121:7-8.
 
Upvote 0