- Feb 21, 2012
- 39,990
- 12,573
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
He's a lawyer. His job was to evaluate whether or not to prosecute President Biden, and legal terms are necessary to do that.It doesn't...those are legal terms....not his actual reasoning.
Again, something Hur never said. You said that.He's severely impaired.
Mind gone.
Hur did not say that.Indeed....you got Kamala lying in the video of the OP and Hur saying it's plausible that Biden had no idea what he was doing one moment to the next.
No, you didn't.Already did.
Not when I show his actual words do not say what you claim he said.Repeating what he says just makes my paraphrasing of the report all the more reasonable.
Let's examine his exact words, shall we:Significantly limited are the words he used to describe the President's ability to recall things in 2017 and 2023.
I made my point. As usual, you ignored it.It's been fun @A2SG ....feel free to stop by whenever you're no longer stuck on repeat and have a point to make.
I made my point. As usual, you ignored it.
No. I stated that you mischaracterized him when you paraphrased him. And I used his exact words to show exactly how you mischaracterized him.You complained I didn't use Hur's exact words....a ridiculous complaint.
Yup. If you're gonna paraphrase someone, don't mischaracterize them.I pointed out I paraphrased him.
Look up "paraphrase".
Anything else?
He's a lawyer.
Again, something Hur never said. You said that.
Not when I show his actual words do not say what you claim he said.
Let's examine his exact words, shall we:
"In addition. Mr. Biden's memory was significantly limited
No. I stated that you mischaracterized him when you paraphrased him.
And I used his exact words to
Yup. If you're gonna paraphrase someone, don't mischaracterize them.
It's only paraphrasing if you make an effort to accurately represent what's being said. You did not do that. You drew conclusions that Hur never reached, and indeed never came even remotely close to making, and then attributed them to him. Inaccurately. Wrongfully.Correct.
Again...paraphrasing.
He never said a word about dementia, or, in fact, anything close to a medical diagnosis.If he's telling his biographer he found docs one moment then forgetting them the next...that explains why he appears to have dementia.
Still not something he said, nor a conclusion he reached in any way whatsoever.Mind gone.
I understand fully well. What you're doing here isn't paraphrasing. It's being deliberately dishonest.It's not my fault you don't understand the word "paraphrasing".
Yup. The rest of what I posted.Significantly limited in 2017. Significantly limited in 2023.
Anything else?
Nope.Let's try this....@A2SG...
Is your complaint that I was paraphrasing and didn't use Hur's exact words?
Yup.Or is your complaint that my characterization of Hur's reasons for not prosecuting are wrong
Nope.and that Hur is actually maintaining that the president is actually of sound and capable mind to be held accountable for his crimes?
Nope.
Yup.
It's only paraphrasing if you make an effort to accurately represent what's being said.
In other words, you made stuff up.
The rest of what you posted has been addressed. You're stuck on repeat like Biden.Yup. The rest of what I posted.
They are helping prove my point. Whether or not you choose to get it is another story, of course. As usual.Well that's a start...stop using his exact words then, they aren't helping you.
Yeah, and getting it wrong. Deliberately, and dishonestly.I'm paraphrasing so I don't need to use his exact words lol.
Insufficient evidence and reasonable doubt.Perfect...tell me how you would characterize it....use your own words.
I understand paraphrasing. I can also recognize when someone does it to deliberately and dishonestly misrepresent what someone said.Every time you quote him you just demonstrate you don't understand paraphrasing...and you agreed above I don't have to use his words.
No, you didn't. You deliberately and dishonestly misrepresented what he said.I did.
Had you done so, it would have been clear he didn't say what you wanted to pretend he said. That's why you didn't quote him.I paraphrased...I don't have to use Hur's exact words.
So listen for a change, and I won't have to repeat myself.The rest of what you posted has been addressed. You're stuck on repeat like Biden.
They are helping prove my point.
Yeah, and getting it wrong.
I understand paraphrasing.
Had you done so *snip*
I have. You're just working overtime to miss it.You have yet to make a point.
I have. Repeatedly.Say how.
Color me shocked.I disagree.
It just shows exactly how dishonest you're being when you "paraphrase" him.If you did...you wouldn't waste your time quoting Hur.