Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Gun ban said to include handguns, shotguns
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="QR1" data-source="post: 62262692" data-attributes="member: 319447"><p>The message was pretty clear in the next Congressional elections. Following the passage of the 1994 law, what had been a majority, got gutted. If another such law is passed it will cost more political careers from the left and then it will be repealed. . . again. It is like a puppy that drops a deuce on the floor, we will just keep rubbing democrat congressional careers in "it" til they get the idea that silly ineffectual laws that penalize citizens while doing nothing to stop crime are bad. (Now I don't advocate that for dogs, but apparently congress folk on the left need that training method to keep from making the same mistake). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, why wait for the SC? Just like last time, enough political capital will be burnt to pass a law that nobody who thinks wants and the following election we'll have enough of Congress it won't even matter who the president is . . . vetos can be overruled and it will cost the democrats enough seats they won't be able to stop it. Maybe this time democrats will learn. Then too, maybe this time enough democrats are thinking and will actively discourage the Feinsteins and Obamas from passing silly ineffectual laws that penalize citizens while doing nothing to prevent crime or violence. Either way, I am not worried. The gun ban will die, the 2A will live on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="QR1, post: 62262692, member: 319447"] The message was pretty clear in the next Congressional elections. Following the passage of the 1994 law, what had been a majority, got gutted. If another such law is passed it will cost more political careers from the left and then it will be repealed. . . again. It is like a puppy that drops a deuce on the floor, we will just keep rubbing democrat congressional careers in "it" til they get the idea that silly ineffectual laws that penalize citizens while doing nothing to stop crime are bad. (Now I don't advocate that for dogs, but apparently congress folk on the left need that training method to keep from making the same mistake). Sure, why wait for the SC? Just like last time, enough political capital will be burnt to pass a law that nobody who thinks wants and the following election we'll have enough of Congress it won't even matter who the president is . . . vetos can be overruled and it will cost the democrats enough seats they won't be able to stop it. Maybe this time democrats will learn. Then too, maybe this time enough democrats are thinking and will actively discourage the Feinsteins and Obamas from passing silly ineffectual laws that penalize citizens while doing nothing to prevent crime or violence. Either way, I am not worried. The gun ban will die, the 2A will live on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Gun ban said to include handguns, shotguns
Top
Bottom