• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

guilty or innocent

do you think michael jackson guilty or innocent?

  • yes

  • no

  • dont know


Results are only viewable after voting.

Diane_Windsor

Senior Contributor
Jun 29, 2004
10,163
495
✟35,407.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
"Do you think michael jackson guilty or innocent? Yes, No, Don't know"

The poll options are not very well defined. Does "yes" mean "yes, I think that he is guilty", or "yes, I think that he is innocent"? Your poll will be skewed and therefore pointless.

Diane
:wave:
 
Upvote 0

MrsGnomeCrusher

Veteran
Mar 17, 2004
1,812
85
Manitoba, Canada
✟17,510.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Zeakio said:
Innocent. That's what the evidence said, so that's what he was. It doesn't matter if people think he is "a bit off", what matters is if he committed the crimes that were brought against him. He did not, is what I gather from the evidence I have heard.

No. It means he's not guilty. It doens't mean he's innocent.
 
Upvote 0
R

rubberchicken007

Guest
country woman said:
Guilty he got off because he has power and money. If he was average he would have been thrown in jail and the key tossed away. he would have beed put in a cell by himself cause otherwise he would not survive. That just my opinion.
true. if he went to prison, the only thing that might possibly keep him alive is his fame. but still, even with that, he wouldnt last long
 
Upvote 0

Psalms34

◄♫♪♫ תהלים ♫♪♫►
Nov 20, 2004
5,745
391
Southern Calif
✟30,482.00
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Constitution
Well, in any case, I'm pretty convinced that the jury was incapable of handling this case. Many of the interviews with jury members (not sound bites...) seemed absurd. When repeatedly asked about specifics concerning why they ruled the way they did, not a single one of them could even give account to even one single circumstance to why they thought he was not guilty. They would say "oh, there are lots of reasons" but when asked for a single reason that really made an impact they would avoid the question and say something like" oh, oh there are just to many reasons to get into" kinda stuff. I mean it was really weird.

lol but they sure did have a strong opinion about the boy's Mother. His Mother would stare at the jury and at one point pointed her finger at one of them and said something like "that's how it is in this world". Man, they were all over her in the interviews, like really the Mother was the one on trial here. IMHO, this trial was botched and should have been a mistrial. I think there was some bullying going on in deliberations.
 
Upvote 0