- Dec 25, 2003
- 42,070
- 16,820
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
If he perused this forum and saw what the lay Creationists post here, they'd be cleaning his head off the ceiling.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I doubt that if Archibald Alexander were alive today that he would approve of the many scientific misrepresentations found in the creationist literature.
Maybe they were talking about cosmic [non-biological] evolution?
It took me 5-10 minutes to read this short article. You are pathetic for saying that you don't have the time, when you claim to be a geologist who believes in a global flood.
If I read it, it would take longer than an hour or even a few hours. I use brain when I read serious articles.
In fact, it would make me angry if I take the content of the article seriously.
Yeah, best option when you don't like someone's opinion: don't read it.
So, why do you read these threads? It is abundantly clear from polls here that pro-evolution atheists outnumber creationists by about 5-1, may be more.
I have not read this issue of Geology Today. Provided this is a thread about geology and creationism. I even browsed the article. But I decided not to read it. It was a very simple and quick decision.
Just out of curiosity, where are you from originally? What is your first language?
If I read it, it would take longer than an hour or even a few hours. I use brain when I read serious articles.
In fact, it would make me angry if I take the content of the article seriously.
In my special case, you should not have that curiosity.
So what? Christian geologists reject their ideas today, do they not? and what does being a geologist have to do with rejecting creationism?
AV, are you familiar with François-René de Chateaubriand and his "Genius of Christianity" (1802)? If not you should be, he's your kind of creationist.
No, sir, I'm not.AV, are you familiar with François-René de Chateaubriand and his "Genius of Christianity" (1802)?
Thank you! I'll check it out!If not you should be, he's your kind of creationist.
Interesting mention of the causes of the French Revolution.Yeah, 1802 sounds about right for those kinds of ideas.
It's the best way to measure the year.
Have you ever seen this book?
In it, the authors detail what really sparked the French Revolution.
They wanted to divide time up as follows:
With "minor adjustments" made along the way.
- 1 day = 10 hours
- 10 days = 1 week
- 10 weeks = 1 month
- 10 months = 1 year
(Actually, it's been awhile since I've read that book. I'll dig it out and check my accuracy.)
Most creationists are as ignorant of the Bible as they are of science, which is to say, "Very!"A creationist reading something other than the Bible? Not gonna happen... At least not the ones that frequent this forum.
Ya ... that's why they're correcting you guys all the time on such subjects as slavery, witch hunting, the Inquisition, and the Crusades, isn't it? not to mention such issues as what was meant by "this generation" in Jesus' speech on the end times.Most creationists are as ignorant of the Bible as they are of science, which is to say, "Very!"
Most creationists are as ignorant of the Bible as they are of science, which is to say, "Very!"
Well, you said, and I can supply the quote if required, that if God told you the Bible was not his word, you would tell God to "Take a hike!" (dad said that in the same circumstances he would "kick his (meaning God's) keister".) The Bible, or more accurately your personal interpretation of it, is dearer to you than God.Ya ... that's why they're correcting you guys all the time on such subjects as slavery, witch hunting, the Inquisition, and the Crusades, isn't it? not to mention such issues as what was meant by "this generation" in Jesus' speech on the end times.
That's right ... if god told me the Bible was not his Word, I would tell him to take a hike.Well, you said, and I can supply the quote if required, that if God told you the Bible was not his word, you would tell God to "Take a hike!"
Posts Per Day: 1.65I have not seen anyone correcting "us guys" on such subjects as "witch hunting, the Inquisition, and the Crusades".
You might believe him, but I won't.[/quote]OK. Just so we have it straight: You would believe your interpretation of the Bible before you would believe God.That's right ... if god told me the Bible was not his Word, I would tell him to take a hike.
You see, I believe very strongly in this verse:
Mark 13:21 And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?