Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Great Flood Evidence?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr GS Hurd" data-source="post: 68947652" data-attributes="member: 347152"><p>Do you want to know why the "schlock" dynamic is diarrhea?</p><p></p><p>John Michael (Mike) Fisher has his little idea exposed as stupid in the first 48 seconds. It is at that point that he falsely asserted that the continental plates are expanding away from the Indian Ocean. That is just not true.</p><p></p><p>At 1:11, he makes the same stupid error that John Baumgardner's "Catastrophic Plate Dynamics" makes. They both forget that there is a simple equation, F=MA; Force equals Mass times Acceleration. And, they missed another basic fact, the Coefficient of Friction. The continents would have melted, and the oceans boiled just from the heat of friction. It there was a magical removal of friction then the smashing of continents together would have made the Himalayas look small.</p><p></p><p>At 1:18 this nitwit started to natter on about geomagnetic studies. The first problem he has is that I have actually done thermoremnant magnetism studies. Mostly I used processional proton magnetometers for remote sensing. But I also did field work on soil and rock samples used in archaeo thermoremnant magnetic dating studies. This is a problem for you because I actually know the literature.</p><p></p><p>Which brings us to the debunking of this "theme" I wrote long ago, <a href="http://stonesnbones.blogspot.com/2011/11/dismissing-catastrophic-plate-tectonics.html" target="_blank">"<span style="font-size: 15px"><strong>Dismissing "catastrophic plate tectonics"</strong></span></a></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Oh, and then there is just the simple geomagnetic features I reviewed in the same blog post. </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr GS Hurd, post: 68947652, member: 347152"] Do you want to know why the "schlock" dynamic is diarrhea? John Michael (Mike) Fisher has his little idea exposed as stupid in the first 48 seconds. It is at that point that he falsely asserted that the continental plates are expanding away from the Indian Ocean. That is just not true. At 1:11, he makes the same stupid error that John Baumgardner's "Catastrophic Plate Dynamics" makes. They both forget that there is a simple equation, F=MA; Force equals Mass times Acceleration. And, they missed another basic fact, the Coefficient of Friction. The continents would have melted, and the oceans boiled just from the heat of friction. It there was a magical removal of friction then the smashing of continents together would have made the Himalayas look small. At 1:18 this nitwit started to natter on about geomagnetic studies. The first problem he has is that I have actually done thermoremnant magnetism studies. Mostly I used processional proton magnetometers for remote sensing. But I also did field work on soil and rock samples used in archaeo thermoremnant magnetic dating studies. This is a problem for you because I actually know the literature. Which brings us to the debunking of this "theme" I wrote long ago, [URL='http://stonesnbones.blogspot.com/2011/11/dismissing-catastrophic-plate-tectonics.html']"[SIZE=4][B]Dismissing "catastrophic plate tectonics"[/B][/SIZE][/URL] [SIZE=4]Oh, and then there is just the simple geomagnetic features I reviewed in the same blog post. [/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Great Flood Evidence?
Top
Bottom