Yeah? Which is two different accounts of how it happened.
And I've already explained to you how two accounts can be different but not contradictory.
If one had said definitively that it happen in one order, while the other said that it happened in another order, then it would have been a contradiction.
But instead what you have is one account stating the details of what happened, and another stating the details of when it happened.
If the bible is the word of god, and he is going to mention twice in the bible how he created the Universe then the least you would expect is for them to be the same.
They are essentially the same.
Because its not the same situation, it would be the same if say one person said your last words were "The Phillies are going to be pretty strong next year in spite of Charlie Manuel", "'Tin Man' was a good miniseries", and "We don't let the children watch 'Torchwood'" and another person said your last words "was i like cheese" then it might be the same situation.
But it is the same situation. I had a long conversation and said several different things. That I said one thing at one point in the conversation and said another thing at another point does not make it a contradiction.
In the same way, that Jesus said one thing at one point in His dying statement and another thing at another point does not make it a contradiction.
Now your putting your own assumptions into the text.
No, I'm not. I'm telling you what the Bible says and why it says so. I did not assume anything. My answer is based on scholarship of the texts, both mine and Bible scholars going back many years.
And once again you think the bible(the word of god) would be a little more accurate on the events of the death of the son of god.
You've yet to show that it is inaccurate in any way.
But its not, i have have just given you examples where it is not consistent
No, you gave me examples of an assumption you made because you did not study the text out
and a link to a website where there are loads more.
Why should I care whether or not there are "loads more" if all of the ones you've given me so far are wrong?
That there are "loads more" does nothing to make the ones you've given me any less wrong.
But denial is a funny thing you can almost convince yourself of anything. (trust me, i have been there)
You're there now.
If you really believe that your able to intelligently discuss doctrine, even though you, yourself, have admitted that you haven't read the Bible in several years and are working from "vague memories", you're in denial.
