God used Evolution to create man

[RichardParker]

Is that why it took years to expose Nebraska Man? the superiority to eye-witness accounts?

"Expose" from WHAT?
Nobody ever really bought that he was a real ancestor!
ONE GUY made a mis-identification of a tooth, pretty much the entire scientific community rejected the identification as unsupported!

And YES, thank's for making my point!
Because you know WHAT eventually turned it from "not supported to be of a human" to "DEFENETLY NOT a human"? Evidence!
NOT eye witness accounts!
Because the forensic evidence was SUPERIOR, and didn't require any eye-witnesses!
You've perfectly made my point. Thanks!

 

[RichardParker]

Superior observation.

(Or do they somehow escape scientists' 20/10 vision?)

WHO escapted scientists visions?
Shapeshifting dinosaurs?
I don't believe in such nonsense! Nobody does!
...
Well, maybe some religous nuts, but they also believe that snakes and donkeys can talk!
But let's be real here: Dinosaurs don't shapeshift... I can't believe that I even have to say that 0_o

 

[AV1611VET]

Not a good example.

Good ... then let's go with Haeckel's embryos.

How is it these scientists with their supervision missed them?

 

[Strathos]

"Expose" from WHAT?
Nobody ever really bought that he was a real ancestor!
ONE GUY made a mis-identification of a tooth, pretty much the entire scientific community rejected the identification as unsupported!

And YES, thank's for making my point!
Because you know WHAT eventually turned it from "not supported to be of a human" to "DEFENETLY NOT a human"? Evidence!
NOT eye witness accounts!
Because the forensic evidence was SUPERIOR, and didn't require any eye-witnesses!
You've perfectly made my point. Thanks!

Don't yell at AV. If he gets under your skin, then he wins.

 

[Loudmouth]

Is that why it took years to expose Nebraska Man? the superiority to eye-witness accounts?

Why do you feel the need to spread misinformation? Is that what God has commanded you to do?

 

[AV1611VET]

Nobody ever really bought that he was a real ancestor!

Right ... and nobody ever really bought that Thalidomide was a prenatal wonder drug, did they?

We "common people" are just "nobodies" compared to scientists and their supervision, aren't we?

 

[lasthero]

Good ... then let's go with Haeckel's embryos.

How is it these scientists with their supervision missed them?

They didn't.

 

[Loudmouth]

Good ... then let's go with Haeckel's embryos.

How is it these scientists with their supervision missed them?

Why don't you tell us what was wrong with Haeckel's embryos. This should be good.

 

[AV1611VET]

Shapeshifting dinosaurs?
I don't believe in such nonsense! Nobody does!

LOL -- solid aurum.

The curious case of the shapeshifting dinosaurs | Science Illustrated

 

[RichardParker]

Right ... and nobody ever really bought that Thalidomide was a prenatal wonder drug, did they?

No, they did. And it was a tragedy.
And we can actually show that this was an actually held believe, in contrary to your story that Nebraska-man was ever excepted by the scientific community!

We "common people" are just "nobodies" compared to scientists and their supervision, aren't we?

No, I completly disagree with you on that.
I don't think that scientists are infaluable.
I just think that people who aren't scientists usually get their information about "science" from very unreliable sources, and then end up believing nonsense (like: "Nebraska man fooled the scientific community").

 

[AV1611VET]

Why do you feel the need to spread misinformation?

I'm not the one claiming 20/10 vision.

 

[RichardParker]

Good ... then let's go with Haeckel's embryos.

How is it these scientists with their supervision missed them?

I don't know who gave you the idea that scientists have "super-vision"...
Maybe you shouldn't get your ideas about scientists from comic-books, or something like that...

But Haeckel's embryos...
Well, Haeckel made an awfull lot of real contribution to science in the area of embryology, so maybe you want to be more specific?

 

[Loudmouth]

I'm not the one claiming 20/10 vision.

Is God commanding you to spread misinformation?

 

[AV1611VET]

They didn't.

Uh-huh.

 

[RichardParker]

I'm not the one claiming 20/10 vision.

Nobody here does.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, they did. And it was a tragedy.
And we can actually show that this was an actually held believe, in contrary to your story that Nebraska-man was ever excepted by the scientific community!



No, I completly disagree with you on that.
I don't think that scientists are infaluable.
I just think that people who aren't scientists usually get their information about "science" from very unreliable sources, and then end up believing nonsense (like: "Nebraska man fooled the scientific community").

So much for 20/10 vision then, eh?

 

[lasthero]

Uh-huh.

Glad we agree.

 

[RichardParker]

LOL -- solid aurum.

The curious case of the shapeshifting dinosaurs | Science Illustrated

Oh! That's what you ment!
Sorry, I thought you were talking about something magical and crazy again (like super-vision-scientists).

Ok. So you are talking about the discovery that certain dinosaurs might have changed their morphology during maturation. Got it.

Ok, what about that?
You are wondering, why this is a new discovery?
Well, seems fairly obvious that something like that is hard to detect, don't you think?
I don't see the issue.

 

[RichardParker]

So much for 20/10 vision then, eh?

WHO CLAIMS THAT?!
You are the only one who ever brought this up!
What are you on about?

 

[Loudmouth]

So much for 20/10 vision then, eh?

So much for you telling the truth, eh?