EternalDragon
Counselor
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Really, now?
So you can point us to the dude? Can we see him using telescopes?
In short, where is your evidence for this claim?
Matthew 1:1
The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.
Be honest. Do you really think that's evidence?
Matthew 1:1
The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.
I am pointing you to the dude, like dogmahunter asked.
I wonder, is what I posted, in #750, just thought to not be of no significant consequence, for any to consider and have some response? Is it brought up so much so as to ignore? I don't know that it was, but the points I speak of are of great consequence to me and I would like knowing that the reasoning was seen, whether or not it is just dismissed.
I asked you to point me to where your god is hiding in the universe, since that seems to be what you believe.
I didn't ask you to quote a bronze-age book.
I was making a joke.You should hate evolution as it has gotten things backwards in their
incorrect assumptions. Man was created first.
Are you interpreting your book by adding to it or do you actually have scripture to back this up?I am saying God is a living, thinking life form in our universe. That
does not make him supernatural nor magical. Maybe to you but not
to me.
That is the Son...not the Father. Try again.Matthew 1:1
The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.
Is this just a long winded "There is something instead of nothing....therefore God exists"?Does anybody ever bring up necessary existence, or talk about it, in these discussions? Not yet seeing it I can understand that some people would just avoid that. But no one has answers for anything being here, without that considered. There must be existence that is necessary existence, or nothing would exist, ever. We might not understand what such could be, but it is not the alternative, which is nothing and never anything other than nothing, total nonexistence, without existence of space, time, or anything. The alternative is yet staggering if it was never considered. Necessary existence, existence that exists because that existence must exist, cannot have any kind of limit to existence. Limits would be arbitrary but not involving what is essential existence. So everything that is true of this essential existence is unlimited in any way, infinite where that can be applied. This existence would just appropriately be called Creator, because this being would be the explanation of all else that was brought into existence. What else would be God but this? And what else could there be otherwise, but such necessary existence? There is nothing otherwise for anything to exist. In light of that what are we to make of such intelligence that we have that we can have the perspective that we perceive and consider enough of so many things that can be known as truth and know so much about our world and cosmos to consider we know explanations that are the truth about all of it?
That is the Son...not the Father. Try again.
I vote then that we throw out the idea of "cloning", since it is confusing you guys.
Science is getting in the way and preventing you from understanding.
What say you?
No argument there.More like mixing religion and science together can result in incomprehensible nonsense if one is not careful
No argument there.
Getting scientists to use proper terminology -- now there's a chore!
That's right.You are not the one who gets to decide what is and isn't proper terminology.
That's right.
So I let the terminology the Bible uses be the final say.
For example, I prefer "miracle" over the mind-blocking "magic".
The manifestation of God as the Son does not automatically make God a part of the universe. It only makes that manifestation of God a part of the universe.Your understanding is lacking. Try again.
The manifestation of God as the Son does not automatically make God a part of the universe. It only makes that manifestation of God a part of the universe.
Watch out that your interpretation doesn't add to the text of your book.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?