- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,086
- 52,634
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
NoJust as my great grand pappy was here long before I was even thought of the stars were here long before the earth ever formed.
It's a huge problem for unguided, unintelligent natural processes
to form from simple life forms to extremely complex life forms.
That's a mouthful of assumptions and speculation.
Why is it that supporters of evolution believe that anyone that doesn't follow their belief is uneducated, taught with false information or of low intelligence.
Do you find it that hard to believe that intelligent, educated people can look at evolution and toss it to the side for something they believe to be the truth?
You claimed that there were no transitional fossils when a quick Google search turns up tons of them.
Why is that?
So.....quoting someone's complete and full statement, who is educated and respected in a related and relevant science, when they publicly state their personal view, in something in a way that is contrary to other peoples view in order to support your own is "quote mining"?
I thought that quote mining was when you took parts or portions of a quote, carefully chosen, in order to support your opinion, when in actual fact, if the whole statement was taken in the context it was originally intended, your point would not be supported at all and may if fact be refuted.
There goes any chance of quoting any intelligent educated, verified statements on any and every topic, in order to support any argument.
Also, you can rule out any text, document, thesis, essay, book, memoirs, speech, encyclopedia or journal because...they are all quotes of someone.
SO,,, I guess, it's just going to be "what do you say" cause you cannot use any other source or its "quote mining"
Those are variations within a species via natural selection
Really?
So this:
and this
Are both just the same species? Or do you maybe want to actually LOOK at that link before you dismiss it?
A fish turns into a fish. That's great. But actually I don't really buy the hype.
You should at the very least be able to tell at a glance the phenotypic differences between those two species exceeds those between humans and chimpanzees by a great deal.
You claimed that there were no transitional fossils when a quick Google search turns up tons of them.
Why is that?
Both Evolution could have happened, and God creating Adam could be true also...
This debate will never end: Adam evolved, or was he directly created by God?
According to Luke, the "beloved physician," Adam was created.This debate will never end: Adam evolved, or was he directly created by God?
No, evolution and the word of God are polar opposites.
God created everything. Everything. There is no "evolution" in God's creations.
1 John 1:3:
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
John 1:10:
He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
Colossians 1:16:
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
When it says God created man, that is it. Man was created by God. No evolution.
Evolutionists try to deceptively hide the fact that life came from a rock. It serve no purpose to science...except for "population control", setting up the world stage for the antichrist, turning people away from God.
According to Luke, the "beloved physician," Adam was created.
Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.
I disagree with you, but whatever... I believe in evolution and that God created Adam and set him apart, set him up, in a garden...
So did God offer salvation to the monkeys? Were they created in the image of God? At any point, did he say this is my only begotten son?!?!?!?!?
So you are saying that God only offers salvation to man if the ape that he created evolves into man? So you think in works salvation (satanic doctrine)/predestination is correct?!?!?!? Is salvation a free gift or not!
Which of the animals did he create in his image and breath life into him????
Faith is the your belief in the unseen. You either believe what God says (which you haven't seen) OR you believe evolution (which you haven't seen). Pick one, but don't mix the two...they are polar opposites.
You need to study your bible.
Those are variations within a species via natural selection, trying hard to look like evolution.
There should actually be a long line of gradually changing fossilized animals.
Even evolutionists, who grasp the magnitude of the problem here, have created the "punctuated equilibrium" theory as an attempt to expain away this problem.
Darwin even understood the demise of his theory....
"Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory. (The Origin of Species)"
The fossil record, which was expected to be the foundation on which to support the theory (as what else do we have to prove the animals that lived on the earth in the past?) is not straight forward evidence for evolution but the subject of scientific controversy.
A fish turns into a fish.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?