Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's a pretty narrow definition, isn't it?When I say life, I mean a living cell that functions, divides, takes on nutrients and continues to do so. When the life leaves, the cell decays.
Then it wouldn't be supernatural, would it?Your claim...you present the evidence.
So first you need amino acids, then you need these to arrange themselves in unbelievably complex, extremely long chains of DNA code to form extremely complex organisms, even at the tiniest level of life. Then you are still missing the cell wall, cytoplasm, mitochondria, nucleoli, Chromatin, endoplasmic reticulum, and the rest of the cell.
And you still don't have life........
Are you just trolling me here? Just google paranormal. There is obviously something beyond our senses and areas of perception and consciousness.
We will only see others like you making claims like you.Are you just trolling me here? Just google paranormal. There is obviously something beyond our senses and areas of perception and consciousness.
The more steps needed just compounds the odds against this complex, intricate, code of huge amounts of information ever coming together without some outside, intelligent, influence.
Oh, now were down to this. When I say life, I mean a living cell that functions, divides, takes on nutrients and continues to do so. When the life leaves, the cell decays.
Where is your evidence that this information needs an intelligent influence?
Not really. If the supernatural can interact with the natural with, maybe a pillar of fire, I think there would be some evidence of the interaction.Then it wouldn't be supernatural, would it?
Supernatural: (of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature.
That's like asking, "What color is invisible?"
Where is your evidence that the incomprehensible complexity and variety of creation is a result of blind, random, meaningless, mindless, directionless natural mechanisms?
Where's your evidence that the theory of evolution says such a thing?
When did a question become evidence?What is the ONLY driving force in Darwinism?
When did a question become evidence?
Ohhh...I forgot that you don't really understand what evidence is or how it works.
Let me help a little.
Try producing a scientific paper in which the conclusion states: "the incomprehensible complexity and variety of creation is a result of blind, random, meaningless, mindless, directionless natural mechanisms". Once you have done that, the scientific paper you produced would be evidence for your claim.
Otherwise, your assertion remains what is was many months ago when you first stated it, a pile of poorly sliced baloney.
Not going to show that the theory of evolution states that tripe you claim it does? Don't know?Nothing there about the ONLY driving force in Darwinism. Don't know?
Not going to show that the theory of evolution states that tripe you claim it does? Don't know?
See? I can use childish methods just like you do. Doesn't seem to get us anywhere though.
You could move the discussion forward by producing something resembling evidence to support your wild accusations regarding the claims of the theory of evolution or the curriculum taught in the U.S. public schools.
If your past actions are any predictor of your future actions, I am relatively sure you will continue with your schoolboy antics and we will continue to ignore you, in a similar fashion to the way we ignore other people that talk to themselves.
Perhaps I could, but that would take the conversation in a different direction, and get you off the hook to provide evidence for your wild claims. So...no. I like the pressure to remain on you.You could simply identify the ONLY driving force in Darwinism. No?
Perhaps I could, but that would take the conversation in a different direction, and get you off the hook to provide evidence for your wild claims. So...no. I like the pressure to remain on you.
You could simply provide a scientific paper that states in it's conclusion, "the incomprehensible complexity and variety of creation is a result of blind, random, meaningless, mindless, directionless natural mechanisms".
Since you can't, I have no choice but to conclude that your months on this forum have not helped your cause in any way, because ALL of your assertions remain unsupported by any evidence.
Perhaps you should find another line of work. You don't seem to be a very good debater.
We could examine the alleged ONLY driving force for Darwinism and determine if it meets the criteria for the incomprehensible complexity and variety of creation being blind, random, meaningless and mindless.....if only we could identify this mysterious, elusive, driving force.
Oh well, maybe one day.
Maybe one day you will pull your head out of the sand and learn the science.
Maybe one day you will pull your head out of the sand and learn the science.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?