Interesting dialogue from an interview with the owner and founder of TBN and Kenneth Copeland:
This one should be interesting, for it does open up a topic that I find many might like.
Question: Why DID 1/3 of the Angels defect? Sure, Lucifer, and perhaps a few top echelon Angels "could" have aspired to "be like God" but what of the others? Presumably, they, being created beings, with full knowledge of, and presumably access TO, the sphere around God, could see that God outranked the Archangels leading the rebellion?
So, why would Copeland have such a point of view, much less actually state it?
LINK OUT TO ENTIRE INTERVIEW: > http://www.letusreason.org/Pent37.htm
Now THAT is a very interesting point of view, that God himself cannot control the Angels and his creations.Kenneth Copeland: "You know everybody you ask, you say, Whos the biggest failure? They say, Judas. Somebody else will say, No, I believe it was Adam. Well, how about the devil?"
Paul Crouch: (amazed.)
Kenneth Copeland: "Hes the most consistent failure . . . but hes not the biggest in terms of material failure and so forth. The biggest [failure] in the whole Bible is God. . . . Wait, wait. Dont you turn that set off. You listen to us. I told you. . . . Now, you sit still a minute. You know me well enough to know I wouldnt tell something I cant prove by the Bible.
"He lost His top ranking of most anointed angel, the first man He ever created, the first woman He ever created, the whole earth and all the fullness therein, a third of the angels at least. Thats a big loss, man! I mean you figure up all of that, thats a lot of real estate, gone down the drain.
"Now, the reason you dont think of God as a failure, He never said Hes a failure. (Paul Crouch and others laughing on the set.) And you are not a failure until you say you are one." ("Praise-a-Thon" program on TBN [April 1988.)
Implication= God couldn't control heavenly and earthly events, he failed but we don't think this way because he never admitted it!
This one should be interesting, for it does open up a topic that I find many might like.
Question: Why DID 1/3 of the Angels defect? Sure, Lucifer, and perhaps a few top echelon Angels "could" have aspired to "be like God" but what of the others? Presumably, they, being created beings, with full knowledge of, and presumably access TO, the sphere around God, could see that God outranked the Archangels leading the rebellion?
So, why would Copeland have such a point of view, much less actually state it?
LINK OUT TO ENTIRE INTERVIEW: > http://www.letusreason.org/Pent37.htm