• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

God seeks to kill Moses

StormyOne

Senior Veteran
Aug 21, 2005
5,424
47
65
Alabama
✟5,866.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
God tells Moses that those who wanted him dead in Egypt are gone and he can return.... so after much hand-wringing Moses starts the journey back to Egypt with family in tow.... now this:

Exodus 4:24-26
Along the way they stopped for the night. The LORD met Moses and tried to kill him. (25) Then Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son's foreskin, and touched Moses' feet with it. She said, "You are a bridegroom of blood to me!" (26) So the LORD let him alone. It was because of the circumcision that she said at that time, "You are a bridegroom of blood!"



explanations?
 

mva1985

Senior Veteran
Jun 18, 2007
3,448
223
58
Ohio
Visit site
✟27,128.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Spiritual Gifts Volume 3 Page 195:

"The Lord directed Moses to say unto Pharaoh, "Thus saith the Lord, Israel is my son, even my first-born. And I say unto thee, Let my son go, that he may serve me. And if thou refuse to let him go, behold, I will slay thy son, even thy first-born." The Lord called Israel his first-born, because he had singled them out from all people to be the depositaries of his law, the obedience of which would preserve them pure amidst idolatrous nations. He conferred upon them special privileges, such as were generally conferred upon the first-born son.
As Moses journeyed to Egypt, the angel of the Lord met him and assumed a threatening posture, as though he would slay him. He was fearful of his life. He had yielded to the refusal of his wife to have their son circumcised, and, in compliance with her wishes, had neglected to obey God. His wife, fearful that her husband might be slain, overcame her feelings of undue affection for her son, and performed the act herself. After this, the angel let Moses go. In his mission to Pharaoh, he was to be placed in a perilous position, where his life would be exposed to the will of the king, if God did not by his power, through the presence of his angels, preserve him. While Moses was living in neglect of one of God's positive commands, his life would not be secure, for God's angels could not protect him while in disobedience. Therefore, the angel met him in the way and threatened his life. He did not explain to Moses why he assumed that threatening aspect. Moses knew that there was a cause. He was going to Egypt according to God's express command, therefore the journey was right. He at once remembered that he had not obeyed God in performing the ordinance of circumcision upon his youngest son, and had yielded to his wife's entreaties to postpone the ceremony. After he had obeyed the command of God he was free to go before Pharaoh, and there was nothing in the way to hinder the ministration of angels in connection with his work.
 
Upvote 0

RC_NewProtestants

Senior Veteran
May 2, 2006
2,766
63
Washington State
Visit site
✟25,750.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
As the EGW quote explains when you can't make sense of something in the Bible simply rewrite the story. It is a very common thing done to the Old Testament writers. When you rewrite the story and fill in all the blanks you not only make the story different you make it appear more reasonable and then it becomes easier to say that this is literal history. Of course they don't mean the story is literal history as written but the story as composed with all the holes filled in is to be taken as literal.

It is one of the big problems people have created in the Bible, they take the evidence which shows just how primitive these people were in their understanding of God and pretends that it never existed. These story however reflect the kind of God that people thought God was. The story of the Old Testament to the New Testament and today is one in our growth in understanding God. The Old Testament books portray that understanding of God, not because it was correct but because that is the place from where God had to start with the people. So we have this story which introduces the idea of circumcision into the Hebrew world. Stories that introduce a concept into the society. Do those stories have to be true, no because they were filtered through the minds of people with hardly any conception of God. As the nations around them a god was their local god and so that god behaved at times irrationally or war like or mercifully.

It is interesting our Sabbath School class covered some of the troubles with the Old Testament yesterday. One of the problems is that people see the brutal nature of God in the Old Testament and they reject God because how can this be called a God of love. I used to think that much of the brutality was because the people at that time were brutal and it was the only way to deal with them. I still think in some cases that is true but in such things as we talked about yesterday, namely the first born killed by the angel of death in Egypt, even such brutality does not make sense (that is first born of man and animals according to the story). You would think that God could have done it in some better way. For instance killing just the pharaoh and then causing a more sympathetic person to be installed as pharaoh.

So my knew thinking is that the angel of death story is not really a part of what happened it is an addition to the story to make their God seem even more powerful and to install the idea that all the first born of Israel should be redeemed, that is money or goods paid to the temple for each first born.
(Exo 22:29 NIV) "Do not hold back offerings from your granaries or your vats. "You must give me the firstborn of your sons.(Exo 22:30 NIV) Do the same with your cattle and your sheep. Let them stay with their mothers for seven days, but give them to me on the eighth day.

We either have to come to terms with the cruelty of the God of the Old Testament or we will continue to see Christianity decline. And just saying the Bible says it I believe it has really not satisfied thinking people. Yet with so much clearly attributed to God as either His actions or His words we must learn to deal with the material in a cogent way. Primitive man with primitive ideas about God seems to be the most likely choice to me.
 
Upvote 0