Deus said:
Ananel said:
However, I will not simply bow before the first spirit who comes to me directly and proclaims itself to be God.
Interesting, you will not bow before a god that appears to you, but you will bow before a religion built on a book?
Your point being? Each will have things sufficient for them. For me, the weight of centuries, the adherence of untold billions, the careful and painstaking metaphysics of more scholars than I care to count have all added up to a metaphysic I can accept. That they all rely upon the revelation of a series of texts dating from around 2000 BC-100 AD really doesn't bother me that much.
(By the way, the distinction of texts v. book is intentional. Though read in conjunction, these are also very separate works. Their meaning is interplayed amongst each other. However, they remain singular works written for singular AND combined purposes. Referring to the vast collection of texts as one 'book' is more than a little flippant and demonstrates a poor grasp of hermeneutics.)
I also draw metaphysical considerations from a variety of other sources, especially where the Scriptures are silent. Many of the systems I draw from are considerably older than my lifespan. I find some value in Thomas Hobbes' writings in the 17th century, in Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu's teachings in the years around 600-300 BC, Sun Tzu's Art of War from the same period, Machiavelli's Prince among a variety of other thinkers. I expect that Soren Kierkegard may end up being one of the most recent writers, along with Jung, to truly attract my attention. All of these have been of value in fleshing out the metaphysic where Scripture remains silent and in giving added weight to readings of a series of texts millenia old.
Tack onto this my own spiritual studies of a more directly metaphysical sense (largely drawn from Jungian systems) and frankly, you're going to have to excuse me if I just don't take your flippant little slight too seriously.
I go back always to the scriptures, but that doesn't make me simply another automoton you can push around saying, "Oh look. He takes a book over spirits. How cute."
Where do you get your eternal fount of wisdom, oh smarmy one? I must ask since you feel so keyed up to deride or question those who study the matters of metaphysics and systematics with care and dilegence.