god created man

[Upisoft]

I suggests you stop accusing me of lying unless you have evidence that I am.

I removed your lies and you said "thanks". It is evidence.

 

[Doveaman]

So, you don't understand how science works, do you? Even if we find a single aspect that was not predicted by the theory it will not be correct. It still could be used for limited cases though. Like Newton mechanics is still used for speeds much less than speed of light.

All this is irrelevant to my point.

The only hypothesis here is “dark-matter”. Dark-matter as a hypothesis is one thing, but when you say it is intended to explain “observed gravitational effects” then that becomes a problem because you are promoting “observed gravitational effects” as a "fact" even though you do not have enough “mass” to account for any “observed gravitational effects”.

The rotation speed of galaxies have been verified.

Rotation speed of galaxies is not a verification of gravity or dark-matter in any form or fashion. This is only an assumption as I indicated above.

You are still quote-mining, despite you already know what follows. But that's fine. You believe what you believe. Do as you please.

What I quoted does not in any way change what follows, nor does what follows take away in any way from what I quoted.

I removed your lies and you said "thanks". It is evidence.

I said thanks to this:

I kept only the true statements for you. The rest is:

Doveaman 2 - 0 Straw Man

In your point system Doveaman has 2 points and Straw Man has 0 points. Therefore Doveaman has 2 points and Straw Man has 0 points.

So, again, thanks.

 

[Hespera]

All this is irrelevant to my point.

The only hypothesis here is “dark-matter”. Dark-matter as a hypothesis is one thing, but when you say it is intended to explain “observed gravitational effects” then that becomes a problem because you are promoting “observed gravitational effects” as a "fact" even though you do not have enough “mass” to account for any “observed gravitational effects”.
Rotation speed of galaxies is not a verification of gravity or dark-matter in any form or fashion. This is only an assumption as I indicated above.
What I quoted does not in any way change what follows, nor does what follows take away in any way from what I quoted.
I said thanks to this:
In your point system Doveaman has 2 points and Straw Man has 0 points. Therefore Doveaman has 2 points and Straw Man has 0 points.

So, again, thanks.

Originally Posted by Upisoft

So, you don't understand how science works, do you? Even if we find a single aspect that was not predicted by the theory it will not be correct. It still could be used for limited cases though. Like Newton mechanics is still used for speeds much less than speed of light.
​

All this is irrelevant to my point.

Your profound ignorance of things scientific seems awfully relevant to the rest of us, when you propose to know more than them scientists do.

 

[Upisoft]

All this is irrelevant to my point.

I see. You point is that you are "right". And that is not going to change, because everything is irrelevant to your point.

OK. You won. Go out and celebrate.

 

[Doveaman]

Your profound ignorance of things scientific seems awfully relevant to the rest of us, when you propose to know more than them scientists do.

I didn't know he was a scientist. My humble apologies.

 

[Doveaman]

I see. You point is that you are "right". And that is not going to change, because everything is irrelevant to your point.

OK. You won. Go out and celebrate.

It was not my intent to be right or to win. My humble apologies.

 

[Hespera]

I didn't know he was a scientist. My humble apologies.

insincerity dont flatter anyone